9/11 and the magic of propaganda
“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist, my emphasis
“The official narrative is preposterous. On its face it is a ludicrous explanation. We don’t accept it.” – Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies, NYU
“If journalists continue to endorse the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Centre, they should begin their articles by saying: ‘I believe in miracles - lots of them.’” – Emeritus Professor of philosophy of religion and theology, Claremont School of Theology and prolific researcher and author, David Ray Griffin
"The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works." – 9/11 researcher, Gerard Holmgren, A Theory
The 9/11 story, as suggested by Gerard Holmgren, was deliberately made ridiculous. It’s not as if the perps don’t know their story is ridiculous. They wrote it, they know and we can see they over-egged the omelette at every turn. Completely against reality, they had not just one or two but four passenger airliners lumbering around the best defended skies in the world unhindered by a breath of interception with one of them - the audacity really knows no bounds - supposedly sailing into Defence HQ in an expert manoeuvre by a pilot who, we were told, cried when asked to attempt steep turns and stalls. And they didn’t just have the airliners crash into the twin towers, they made them, according to impossible physics, bring them down along with another steel frame skyscraper, WTC-7, later in the afternoon whose impeccable implosion they showcased to us from seven vantage points (as I say, the audacity knows no bounds).
Steel frame skyscrapers don’t come down by fire. We know that from the complete absence of its happening outside its alleged occurrence on 9/11 and we have Fire Protection Engineer, Scott Grainger, among other relevant professionals, testifying to the fact. It’s not a thing, never happened, never will. Steel frame buildings especially don’t come down by fire when every hallmark of implosion (horizontal roofline for a number of seconds, etc) you can nominate is evidenced in their collapse.
The only thing that will make anyone believe that WTC-7 came down by fire is propaganda, nothing else. They didn’t even bother disguising its collapse with a lick of flame … you don’t need to ask why they didn’t do that, simply refer to the headlining quotes. They tell all.
I have tested the response of those indoctrinated by the fire propaganda to make their case for fire over implosion but not a single fire-subscriber has responded. They cannot because there is simply no confusion between a destruction of a building by fire and a destruction by controlled implosion, they have zero in common, no confusability whatsoever. But does the inability to respond to the challenge to present their case change their mind? No, of course, not. Indoctrination by propaganda rules and the perps know that so very well.
From centuries (see The Great Fire of London – Cui Bono and ‘Remember Remember the 5th of November…’), millennia even, of experience those in power know that they can have total confidence in the limitless elasticity of the Emperor’s New Clothes effect. It doesn’t matter how nonsensical – the more nonsensical the better, in fact – the majority of people will accept what they’re told. They may not believe it enthusiastically but they will accept it … and that is all that is required.
Before we go further
At this point we know that the massive discrepancy between reality and narrative tells us that 9/11 is a psyop so it behooves us to ponder what the perps wanted and didn’t want, what they needed and what wouldn’t work for them in this spectacular oeuvre, many years in the planning.
What they wanted:
Yet another terror story to frighten us to better keep us under control
Complete destruction of all seven buildings at the World Trade Centre which was achieved by the demolition of three on the day and the rest later
Introduction of a number of laws
No doubt a number of other things, including lucrative moneymaking opportunities for some people, of which I know little
What they had no particular desire for:
Real passenger airliners flying around and penetrating buildings
Real deaths and injury
What they needed:
A great deal of complicity and voluminous amounts of ongoing propaganda in a number of forms: media stories galore, actors in government, corporations and agencies and other actors
Demolition companies to demolish the seven World Trade Centre buildings - Controlled Demolition, Inc, the demolition company hired to remove the rubble from the WTC and holder of a few world records in bringing down very large buildings could not fail to have played a major role (the “dancing Israelis” we are told about, stopped in a white van containing explosives dust is pure propaganda to mislead us into believing “outsiders” did it).
What wouldn’t work for them (but what they had no particular desire for in any case):
Real passenger airliners flying around and penetrating buildings
Real deaths and injury
The case against real passenger airliners
A priori, we wouldn’t expect them in a psyop because psyops are about making people believe things that aren’t true using smoke’n’mirrors propaganda, not simulating reality as closely as possible and they didn’t want planes they only wanted us to believe in them. Relevant professionals also tell us it wasn’t possible for passenger airliners to do what was claimed. I know someone who was at the WTC on the day and said he saw a plane heading to the South tower although from his vantage point he didn’t see it penetrate. Perhaps he did see an aeronautical object but whatever he saw, it wasn’t one of the nominated passenger airliners and that’s what counts. What he saw was not a passenger airliner containing passengers and the object we are shown on video melting into the South tower doesn’t in the least resemble the passenger airliner it supposedly was.
200-tonne airliners don’t melt into 500,000 tonne steel frame skyscrapers then seemingly poke out the other side, causing them to crash to the ground in 12 seconds flat. Not a thing. For more click here.
The case against real deaths and injury
A priori again, we wouldn’t expect them in a psyop where they didn’t want to kill and injure people unless for some reason it was a necessity but there was no necessity. The whole of the World Trade Centre was a complete mess after the twin towers came down so we can only infer that the whole area was evacuated to avoid death and injury, not just in the twin towers but in the other WTC buildings and the general area which was badly affected. The perps would never have asked Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) to go ahead and bring the buildings down without ensuring evacuation, completely against their professional ethos. The idea is a complete absurdity. CDI is justifiably very proud of their safety record and just as steel frame buildings don’t come down by fire on only one day in history, demolition companies don’t decide to throw their professional standards in the trash and let people die in buildings they demolish. All the evidence we see for death and injury easily fits the category of “pseudo evidence”, it is not convincing. The jumpers, the memorials, the survivor stories, the injured, the loved ones - all fake, fake photos, fake stories, people participating in drills, actors. For more click here.
9/11 was a monster psyop where all that happened for real was the destruction of a number of very large buildings but how many thousands and thousands of words have been written saying all manner of things, how much news, television programs and films made - all propaganda. It defies credibility I must say.