Both believers and disbelievers of the 9/11 story must accept miracles and absurdities

Paradoxical? Not when you consider the 9/11 propaganda strategy and how mind control works

“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist, my emphasis

“If journalists continue to endorse the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Centre, they should begin their articles by saying: ‘I believe in miracles - lots of them.’” – Emeritus Professor of philosophy of religion and theology, Claremont School of Theology and prolific researcher and author, David Ray Griffin

“The official narrative is preposterous. On its face it is a ludicrous explanation. We don’t accept it.” – Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies, NYU

​"The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works." – 9/11 researcher, Gerard Holmgren, A Theory

---

As indicated by 9/11 analysts in the headlining quotations, the mainstream 9/11 story is ridiculous but what about the story woven alongside the mainstream narrative told to the anticipated disbelievers? Of course, the perps knew that a small but not insignificant minority were not going to believe their nonsense story (although I must confess I believed it myself for 13 years) so, a priori, there is good reason to suspect that there will be a secondary propaganda campaign directed to those people, the so-called “controlled opposition” propaganda, in order to keep truth in a stalemate position.

What could suit the perps better than have everyone get it wrong, the believers and the disbelievers alike?

In his book, Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, David Ray Griffin put forward 15 miracles we need to believe in order to accept the 9/11 mainstream narrative summarised below in Edward Curtin’s review of the book. In fact I see now that what is discussed in 10, 11 and 12, are part of the secondary propaganda campaign which I indicate in comments.

1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries.

2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires.

3. WTC 7 was not even hit by a plane, so it was the first steel-framed high-rise to be brought down solely by ordinary building fires.

4. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall, WTC 7 in absolute free fall – for over two seconds.

5. Although the collapses of the WTC buildings were not aided by explosives, the collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies.

6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fail simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern.

7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair.

8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated in midair.

9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet.

10. The fires in the debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months. [This is secondary propaganda to misdirect the disbelievers to believe that some special method of controlled demolition was used such as thermite/nanothermite, when there is no reason to believe other than conventional explosives were used. This footage has been used to persuade people of molten metal when it is simply people using searchlights.]

11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉). [Also secondary propaganda related to that in point 10.]

12. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation. [Also secondary propaganda related to that in points 10 and 11. A few beams showing Swiss-cheese-appearing steel can easily be presented as “evidence”.]

13. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through.

14. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did.

15. Besides going through an unbelievable personal transformation, ringleader Mohamed Atta also underwent an impossible physical transformation.

All the disbelievers are agreed: we need to believe in miracles and absurdities to accept the mainstream story. But what about the miracles and absurdities the disbelievers who subscribe to the bare “inside job” hypothesis need to believe in relation to the claim that 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured on the fateful day.

A priori, as all the evidence from multiple sources indicates fakery of the four passenger airliner crashes we know right off the bat that 265 people did not die in plane crashes. But this blatant fact is simply glossed over by the disbelievers, at least the disbelievers sensible enough to recognise the complete lack of evidence of airliner crashes. Nobody died in a plane crash, 265 people did not die in plane crashes and we have no evidence to suggest they died another way. This is a significant fact that cannot be overlooked.

The question arises: if they faked 265 plane passenger deaths, whatever they did for those fakeries could they not also do for the remaining 2,735 alleged deaths? Why not? All they had to do was what, in fact, demolition professionals ALWAYS do when demolishing buildings, namely, FULLY (as opposed to partly) evacuate the twin towers before they came down and fake the memorials, loved ones, etc in exactly the same way they did for the alleged plane passengers. As we know the crashes were staged all the flames appearing from the twin towers could simply be smoke’n’mirrors type flames emanating from unoccupied floors - they mean nothing.

Absurdity No. 1 - Deaths in some WTC buildings but not others

While deaths and injuries were reported in the World Trade Centre area generally, deaths and injuries in actual buildings were reported only in WTCs 1, 2 and 3 but not in 4, 5, 6 or 7 or in other neighbouring buildings which received major damage (see Damage Assessment image below).

When we look at the WTC layout and damage assessment that makes no sense.

WTC-3, the 22-storey Marriott Hotel, nestled between the twin towers, was the only building other than the twin towers where deaths were reported to have occurred. Partially collapsed was 9-storey WTC-4 directly east of WTC-2, the first twin tower to collapse. Obviously, the damage to WTC-4 must have primarily come from WTC-2, the first tower to come down, not WTC-1 so it cannot be argued that WTC-4 was evacuated between the destructions of the twin towers, it must have been evacuated prior to WTC-2’s collapse. So are we to believe that demolition professionals agreed to evacuate other buildings but not 1, 2 and 3 prior to bringing the twin towers down.

Just as Shylock couldn’t take only a pound of flesh without blood, there could only be deaths in 1, 2 and 3 with none in 4, 5, 6 and 7 if the latter four had been evacuated prior while 1, 2 and 3 were only partially evacuated. Who would be willing to participate in orchestrating that scenario and why would such a scenario be chosen?

World Trade Centre after twin tower collapses

Absurdity No. 2 - the miracle survivor stories

We are told a number of survivor stories that completely contradict reality, for example, that of Pasquale Buzzelli, who allegedly survived the 12-second collapse of 110-storey WTC-1 and was back at work three months later showing nary a scratch.

Other 9/11 miracle survivor stories lacking credibility:

At a Ground Zero Hotel, Room for Miracles

Stanley Praimnath

If any reader can point to a 9/11 survivor story that strikes them as particularly credible please let me know in the comments.

If we are not going to accept the miracle of the unprecedented destruction of high rise steel frame buildings by fire in order to be consistent in our scientific and critical thinking equally we cannot accept the unprecedented miracle of human survival of the collapse of such a building or other impossible-to-credit stories of survival. When we think critically we must be consistent, this is a number one rule. We don’t apply our critical thinking here but not there.

Absurdity No. 3 - No trauma victims taken to Manhattan hospitals

We see ABC’s Cynthia McFadden at NYC’s Bellevue Hospital Emergency Intake on the morning of 9/11 speaking of the lack of trauma victims and we see empty gurneys and wheelchairs and medical staff just standing around. A commenter on this video says:

"I was in NYC on 911 and tried to help at a triage unit … there were no injured there at all. It was about 8 blocks away from where the Towers were ... I asked an EMS worker where the injured were and his response was there were no injured victims ... I also watched vehicles coming out of the area and did not see any crushed or flattened vehicles at all ... I was there from 12:00 PM until 9:30 PM ... all the vehicles that were coming out of the WTC area were in good condition ... it looked like a parade of firetrucks and ambulances ... there were flatbeds that had vehicles on them in good condition - those flatbeds should have been carrying the crushed vehicles ... what we saw on the media was very different from what I saw in person that day ... I have many unanswered questions ... it was a strange day indeed ... I did see people covered in dust but no one had injuries that I could see ... all the emergency prep work was done early and stayed unused ... they had wheelchairs and stretchers and folding beds  that looked like they were on display in front of hospitals and at the triage units ... I saw no dirty linen bins at all ... so tell me again about all the hundreds of injured people!!!!  I wound up cooking burgers and hot dogs at the triage unit for the firefighters and ems workers ... one of my questions is why was there a BBQ set up at a triage unit in the first place??  Maybe they knew in advance that they would not be using that area for any injured people ..."

In the evening we see Cynthia at the trauma centre set up at Chelsea Piers speaking of asking the centre staff why the number of expected trauma victims hasn't been seen.

I can't help chortling over this video of a man who is being released from hospital and supposed to be “the last burns victim from the WTC leaving hospital”. No prizes for guessing what he's really suffering from.

Absurdity No. 4 - Israeli involvement in the destruction of the buildings

I’m certainly not claiming there was no Israeli involvement in the destruction of the buildings and Israel was obviously involved in the 9/11 charade to a reasonable degree as were so many other nations including my own - it wasn’t a coincidence that Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, was paying a “surprise” visit to Washington on the fateful day. Israel’s involvement as indicated, however, is an absurdity.

We are told various versions of a story (a typical feature of psyops) about a woman who, on spying five men of Middle Eastern appearance seemingly celebrating immediately after the destruction of the towers, decided to film them and submit her footage to the authorities. These five were then supposedly caught in a roadblock in their white van which was found to contain explosives dust. Then supposedly the FBI rounded up these suspicious Israelis who turned out to be Mossad agents. Apart from yes, they were no doubt Mossad agents playing patsy the story is ludicrous! No one was rounded up, no one was bothered about who brought the buildings down … they knew who it was and it certainly wasn’t dancing Israelis. We are also shown evidence of Israeli “art students” doing projects in the twin towers prior to 9/11 while we are given to understand that the supposed art students are really Mossad agents laying explosives. Again, yes, Mossad agents and they may have been involved in fakery such as the footage of alleged jumpers and the people allegedly standing stranded at the windows at the top of the towers waving pieces of clothing but there is no reason to believe they were responsible setting the building up for demolition.

We can see that one purpose of the Israeli story is to direct disbelievers of the 9/11 narrative to believe that “outsiders” were hired rather than US citizens to do the dastardly deed of bringing the buildings down with all those poor people in them. I know this from first-hand experience because it’s what I reasoned when I learnt of the dancing Israelis caught with explosives dust in their white van, “Oh I see, they got outsiders, they couldn’t have got US citizens to kill their own fellow citizens in that barbaric way” … but in hindsight I recognise how gullible I was and how silly the story.

There are more absurdities in the death and injury narrative which you can easily find yourself. Check out the media stories yourself, there’s quite a few gems.

So who did bring the buildings down?

Founded by the Loizeaux family in 1947 and owned by them since, Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) holds a few world records for demolition of very large buildings and a safety record of which they are justifiably proud. CDI was hired to remove the rubble from the WTC. It would seem improbable in the extreme for CDI not to have played a major role in the destructions of the WTC buildings, don’t you think? Certainly, they are much more likely than a bunch of dancing Israelis, no?

The 9/11 propaganda strategy - false dilemma fallacy aka fake binary

Let’s revisit one of the headlining quotes.

​"The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works." – 9/11 researcher, Gerard Holmgren, A Theory

While Gerard Holmgren was an extremely insightful analyst of the 9/11 psyop he didn’t have it quite right. It only seemed as though we had one of two stark options. Either:

• a low-on-credibility barbaric attack by boxcutter-armed terrorists or

• cold-blooded and callous murder of its citizens by the US government …

… but the reality was neither of these two scenarios: 9/11 was, effectively, a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise pushed out as a real event where the only reality was destruction of buildings, planes were faked and death and injury were staged (which isn’t to say no one died or was hurt).

The most efficient one hour you can spend to get the best understanding of what kind of event 9/11 really was - not a terrorist attack nor an inside job per se - is the film, 9/11 Fraud and Terror Agenda, made by Russian couple, Olga and Slava Klimova, who call themselves Earthly Fireflies.

While we are - effectively - told that the evil power elite were responsible for the callous, cold-blooded killing of 3,000 people and injury to 6,000 on 9/11 but were, in fact, innocent of that alleged crime as they were obviously staged, they are indeed responsible for the callous, cold-blooded murder and injury to thousands upon thousands of people through implementation of measures, notably the toxic covid jabs (although not limited to the jabs), while we are being told they’re saving us. The alleged covid pandemic is an unconscionably cruel and barbaric psyop that truly beggars belief.

You can persuade bureaucrats and health professionals to implement measures that kill and injure people using propaganda based on over a century of fraudulent science but you cannot propagandise demolition professionals to partially evacuate buildings before destroying them. Besides, they didn’t want to kill and injure people on 9/11 they only wanted us to believe people died and were injured - obviously now they really do want to kill and injure people because the amount of harm caused far exceeds what can reasonably called “collateral damage”.