Psyops: they do what they want for real and fake the rest

How to analyse psyops efficiently

“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist, my emphasis

“If journalists continue to endorse the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Centre, they should begin their articles by saying: ‘I believe in miracles - lots of them.’” – Emeritus Professor of philosophy of religion and theology, Claremont School of Theology and prolific researcher and author, David Ray Griffin

“The official narrative is preposterous. On its face it is a ludicrous explanation. We don’t accept it.” – Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies, NYU

​"The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works." – 9/11 researcher, Gerard Holmgren, A Theory

As indicated by the quotations above, psychological operations (or psyops) - which are perpetrated on us by those in power with monotonous regularity - are quite different from other crimes in that no effort is made to cover the fact that it is indeed, they, those in power, who are responsible for the crime. They tell us loud and clear in making their narrative completely at odds with obvious reality. Seemingly counterintuitively, it works better that way. We can only infer that this is a reflection of power’s seeming miraculous ability to addle our brains. Perhaps it works that way because we are social hierarchical creatures in need of leaders so instinctively we feel we cannot go against what our leaders say and leave ourselves rudderless. Whatever the reason, centuries, if not millennia of psyops (see The Great Fire of London – Cui Bono and ‘Remember Remember the 5th of November…’) tell us that the Emperor’s New Clothes effect has a limitless elasticity which those in power understand perfectly and know they can rely on without fail while the punters either have no idea or don’t quite understand how very much this timelessly effective tool of control figures prominently in their constant propagandising of us.

When we see a clear instance of complete contradiction of reality by a narrative delivered to us 24/7 we know right away a psyop is being delivered with the intention of controlling us. So what is the most efficient approach to determine what’s really happening?

As alluded to, the narrative will not match reality in very obvious fashion and we can expect gratuitous over-egging of the omelette at every turn. They didn’t need four passenger airliners to be hijacked for their terror story, surely just two into the twin towers would have been sufficient, impossible regardless in the best defended airspace in the world, but four including one sailing into Defence HQ piloted in an impossible manoeuvre by a little guy who, we’re told, cried when asked to attempt steep turns and stalls? They really had a laugh over that one.

So first thing on our psyop checklist: a narrative of itself lacking credibility with gratuitous embellishment.

The next thing we need to add to our psyop analysis lens is to determine what is wanted in the psyop and what isn’t. Psyops are about making us believe things that aren’t true by using smoke’n’mirrors propaganda, not by doing things for real unless they’re wanted. As evidenced by the terrorist Top Gun at the Pentagon, they don’t even try to simulate reality - simulating reality or doing things for real (unless wanted) are not what a psyop’s about. OK, they showed us an approximation of a plane colliding with the South tower but the “plane object” didn’t closely resemble a real airliner and the alleged “collision” is so against crash physics we cannot call it a serious attempt at simulation. Why would they do things for real - or even make an effort with their simulation - when they so clearly can tell us any old rubbish and we’ll accept it, when the trusty Emperor’s New Clothes works every time and, in fact, seems to enhance the propaganda’s power.

So let’s ask what they wanted for real on 9/11.

• The major object was complete destruction of all seven buildings at the World Trade Centre (WTC) achieved by the demolition of WTCs 1, 2 and 7 on the day and WTCs 3-6 later.

Only the twin towers destructions were part of their terror story, the on-the-day showcased implosion of WTC-7 was a propaganda decoy for those they anticipated wouldn’t believe their nonsense story while the eventual destructions of WTCs 3-6 were done soon after with great discretion.

What they had no particular desire for:

• Real passenger airliners flying around and penetrating buildings

• Real deaths and injury

What they needed:

• A great deal of complicity and voluminous amounts of ongoing propaganda in a number of forms: media stories galore, actors in government, corporations and agencies and other actors

• Demolition professionals to demolish the seven WTC buildings - it seems improbable in the extreme that Controlled Demolition, Inc, the demolition company hired to remove the rubble from the WTC which holds a few world records for demolition of very large buildings and a safety record of which they are justifiably proud did not play a major role in this massive operation (the “dancing Israelis” we are told about, stopped in a white van containing explosives dust is just one instance of their ludicrous propaganda (that I fell for completely) to mislead us into believing “outsiders” were hired to commit the dastardly deed).

When we blow away the magic propaganda dust what does the evidence actually say?

The passenger airliners

I know someone who was in the vicinity of the WTC on 9/11 who said he saw the second plane heading to the South tower. Numerous other witnesses say they saw a plane. We can assume some alleged witnesses were hired to say they saw different types of aeronautical objects to confuse matters but it’s probably safe to say that either an aeronautical object did indeed fly around the WTC or else - as has been suggested by some but seems much less likely - holograms were used. It makes no difference what - if anything - flew around the WTC on 9/11, it definitely wasn’t one of the alleged passenger airliners and that’s all that matters. We must constantly apply Occam’s Razor when assessing psyops because the propaganda will include masses of irrelevant information whether true or false designed to mislead and bamboozle us. The important thing is that there is no evidence of passenger airliners flying around the WTC on 9/11 which means that none of the alleged passengers died in the alleged planes and we have no particular reason to believe that any of them died at all, if indeed they were real people. Barbara Olson certainly was a real person. She didn’t die in Flight 77, we don’t know what happened to her and there are other alleged passengers who were obviously real people, we don’t know what happened to them. The fact that we don’t know what happened to them, however, in no way contradicts the confluence of evidence from multiple sources clearly showing that none of the alleged passenger airliner crashes occurred - and, according to psyop MO, we wouldn’t have expected their real occurrence as there was no reason for them in reality, they only wanted us to believe them.

3,000 dead and 6,000 injured

The most important alleged crime wasn’t lying about hijackers in planes and how tall buildings came down, of course, it was the alleged murder and injury caused … but the most important alleged crime, ironically, is the element of the story that has received the least scrutiny. If the perps had faked an attack by terrorists that involved only damage to physical structures we’d all have moved on long ago. Who would care? It’s the terrible tragedy of human loss and injury that keeps everyone going - those who believe the story and those who don’t.

Right off the bat though we can strike off 265 deaths in passenger airliner crashes. So, so far we have: complete fabrication of hijacked passenger airliners which automatically means lies about the method of building destruction and lies about 265 of the 3,000 alleged deaths.

In fact, without clear evidence we can really strike off, at least in the main, the rest of the deaths in the buildings because they simply make no sense when we look at what we can have expected to happen. Demolition professionals needed to bring the buildings down and we’d really have to wonder how they’d agree to completely abandon their professional ethics and standards and simply leave people in the buildings. While health professionals can be propagandised into believing that unsafe and ineffective substances are safe and effective vaccines, there’s no propaganda to persuade demolition professionals to not to bother evacuating people before they demolish buildings.

They didn’t need real death and injury for their terror story just as they didn’t need real passenger airliners (or even very good approximations of them) nor plausible alternative explanations for obvious controlled demolitions. They don’t need reality, reality very often wouldn’t work for them and they much prefer duping us with smoke’n’mirrors anyway.

And the evidence? The evidence clearly shows fakery: the jumpers, the memorials, the injured, the loved ones, the survivors - fake or actors.

When they’re not killing people they tell us they are … and when they tell us they’re saving people they’re killing or harming them with toxic injections (see Critical thinking: The moon landings, 9/11 and covid - Part 3. The irony.