Interesting post. I do think your option #3 is possible, but there are also some obvious objections - the biggest being the scale of the coverup. I think something on the size of Sandy Hook would be possible, albeit challenging, to pull off without any leaks. Something the size and scale of 9/11 - that’s a hell of a lot different. You’re talking about thousands of people involved and hundreds of firemen. The white collar workers where entire companies or organizations were wiped out - each and every one agreed to participate in the hoax? Thousands of people agreed to abandon their families and live under a new identity? Not one person said “no” and went public? I realize the CIA is capable of some crazy shit but this would be beyond the pale.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to kill everyone in the buildings and airplanes instead? Dead men tell no tales sort of thing?
In the end, the official narrative is obviously total BS. So whether everyone died or it was a full scale exercise it’s still the government(s) behind it. And it was used as a pretext for the Patriot Act and forever war. If the people died or disappeared I don’t think there is a big difference. Either they died unwillingly or willingly bailed on their families for some cash. Either way the government is at war with its citizens.
Look The United States is a bottomless cesspool of lies. Until these lies are acknowledged and all involved are outed and prosecuted then America will NEVER EVER be the kind of country we originally signed up for. I however believe it will never happen. We will fall and all those who continue to lie will be served their just desserts in hell not in this world.
Dalrymple's 'a society of emasculated liars is easy to control' is, of course, any tyrant's wet dream. it can only happen with more or less sophisticated indoctrination tools and technology, i.e. (mass) media, postmodernist art and television/computer/iPhone screens. yet here we are, so many of us still able to understand and point out the flaws in the narrative. kudos for your work!
A LOT of people have woken up to the truth that the Towers were mostly turned to dust before hitting the ground on September 11, 2001.
They have also realised that they should count past three and that the 9/11 orphans, WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6 as well as the anomaly with the Bankers Trust building, blows the distraction narratives of jet fuel, explosives, thermite or nukes out of the water...
So, now what?
What to do with this information that has rocked your world?
Would anyone agree of their free will to participate in a terror exercise if they are aware that they will have to live under a fake identity afterwards? Would they have been threatened into agreeing?
Yes there could be three options for what happened on 9/11. In my opinion it was for a goal of surveillance and control of the population via legislation like the patriot act and second to emotionally charge the people so they accept a war in the Middle East. But who’s to say there wasn’t another reason to collapse the twin towers, more important to the perpetrators than war and control? And if there are three possible explanations of 9/11 maybe there is a fourth? Or 5th? What is a given is 9/11 changed the world. I believe it was related to RFK murder and more. Someday if the truth ever surfaces.....
Three buildings collapse at free fall speed, obvious as day explosives were placed in the buildings, controlled demolition, and still the apologists for the empire gossip about who said what when never asking who placed the explosives in the towers. Shying away from the hard questions doesn’t reflect well on one’s character, but that’s okay if that’s okay with you. Best.
I look at this way, the digital analysis: 1) the official story is true, or 2) the official story is false. At that level of analysis there are no other choices.
As it is 22 years old now, and years of discovery of facts and evidence, the only logical possibility is that the official story is false. All facts and evidence contradict the official story, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. The Official Conspiracy Theory is invalid.
Analysis from this point on must recognize that fact. Other theories may certainly be advanced, but they must comport with the facts .
Great explanation of the dilemma Petra!
Interesting post. I do think your option #3 is possible, but there are also some obvious objections - the biggest being the scale of the coverup. I think something on the size of Sandy Hook would be possible, albeit challenging, to pull off without any leaks. Something the size and scale of 9/11 - that’s a hell of a lot different. You’re talking about thousands of people involved and hundreds of firemen. The white collar workers where entire companies or organizations were wiped out - each and every one agreed to participate in the hoax? Thousands of people agreed to abandon their families and live under a new identity? Not one person said “no” and went public? I realize the CIA is capable of some crazy shit but this would be beyond the pale.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to kill everyone in the buildings and airplanes instead? Dead men tell no tales sort of thing?
In the end, the official narrative is obviously total BS. So whether everyone died or it was a full scale exercise it’s still the government(s) behind it. And it was used as a pretext for the Patriot Act and forever war. If the people died or disappeared I don’t think there is a big difference. Either they died unwillingly or willingly bailed on their families for some cash. Either way the government is at war with its citizens.
Look The United States is a bottomless cesspool of lies. Until these lies are acknowledged and all involved are outed and prosecuted then America will NEVER EVER be the kind of country we originally signed up for. I however believe it will never happen. We will fall and all those who continue to lie will be served their just desserts in hell not in this world.
Dalrymple's 'a society of emasculated liars is easy to control' is, of course, any tyrant's wet dream. it can only happen with more or less sophisticated indoctrination tools and technology, i.e. (mass) media, postmodernist art and television/computer/iPhone screens. yet here we are, so many of us still able to understand and point out the flaws in the narrative. kudos for your work!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
9/11 The Plane / No Plane debate settled.
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
A LOT of people have woken up to the truth that the Towers were mostly turned to dust before hitting the ground on September 11, 2001.
They have also realised that they should count past three and that the 9/11 orphans, WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6 as well as the anomaly with the Bankers Trust building, blows the distraction narratives of jet fuel, explosives, thermite or nukes out of the water...
So, now what?
What to do with this information that has rocked your world?
Read: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ive-woken-up-to-dustification-on
400+ video's organised under various playlists covering all the talking points regarding 9/11
Link: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7
It's set up as a learning hub for someone like you...
Highly recommended watching;
1. 2012 Presentation: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911---Dr.-Judy-Wood-Evidence-of-Breakthrough-Energy-on-911-B---full-2h-seminar:4
2. 9/11 Observable Evidence series: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6
3. 9/11 Alchemy Series: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Alchemy-Series:d
4. 9/11 & Muddling up the search for truth: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Gatekeepers:a
You're welcome...
Would anyone agree of their free will to participate in a terror exercise if they are aware that they will have to live under a fake identity afterwards? Would they have been threatened into agreeing?
Yes there could be three options for what happened on 9/11. In my opinion it was for a goal of surveillance and control of the population via legislation like the patriot act and second to emotionally charge the people so they accept a war in the Middle East. But who’s to say there wasn’t another reason to collapse the twin towers, more important to the perpetrators than war and control? And if there are three possible explanations of 9/11 maybe there is a fourth? Or 5th? What is a given is 9/11 changed the world. I believe it was related to RFK murder and more. Someday if the truth ever surfaces.....
Three buildings collapse at free fall speed, obvious as day explosives were placed in the buildings, controlled demolition, and still the apologists for the empire gossip about who said what when never asking who placed the explosives in the towers. Shying away from the hard questions doesn’t reflect well on one’s character, but that’s okay if that’s okay with you. Best.
Good stuff - I'm subscribing... :)
I look at this way, the digital analysis: 1) the official story is true, or 2) the official story is false. At that level of analysis there are no other choices.
As it is 22 years old now, and years of discovery of facts and evidence, the only logical possibility is that the official story is false. All facts and evidence contradict the official story, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. The Official Conspiracy Theory is invalid.
Analysis from this point on must recognize that fact. Other theories may certainly be advanced, but they must comport with the facts .