A reposting of Sensible Site's responses to 31 of the 42 questions posed in the documentary by Massimo Mazzucco, American Moon plus links to other debunking
Dec 2, 2023·edited Dec 2, 2023Liked by Petra Liverani
Thanks for this info It will take time to get thru it. I'm in the learning phase as I told you before. One question, on this
"there is no atmosphere on the moon so you would not get billowing clouds of dust like you'd get on Earth."
What does the LEM do to soft land on the moon? If there is no atmosphere, what would it thrust push against? It wouldn't be able to push against the surface until coming very close to it, seems too late to me, and parachutes would not work of course with no atmosphere. Maybe on Mars parachutes would have some value and if landers were encased in a bubble that would bounce until stationary.
Later, and take your time, sorry it's a lot of work, can you debunk this vid, some of the points may or may not be true so those points are not bunkable nor debunkable so you can skip them.
The "astronauts" can't even quickly agree on whether or not they can see stars from the moon. NASA in Hebrew means 'to deceive'. I don't see how anybody could watch this and still believe they went to the moon. And they claim to have "lost" the telemetry data they used to get there. The comedy of errors and gafs are too numerous to mention.
I don’t understand Petra writing in her September 2023 blog: “ it was the audio recordings of the astronauts to Mission control that first convinced me of the reality of the moon landings”. Audio recordings can’t be faked? Oh yes they can!
James McCanney says that several cosmonauts and animals sent through the Van Allen belt came back "cooked", according to Soviet sources that cited it as the reason why they terminated their space program.
Petra, you’re the first person I’ve seen to say 9/11 was fake but moon landings were real. It takes all kinds! I think it’s much easier to doubt the moon landings as there’s much less evidence of “independent” verification to be discarded. That is, no “amateur videos” of any moon landing, no civilian “eyewitness accounts” of any astronaut stepping on the moon.
Thanks for this info It will take time to get thru it. I'm in the learning phase as I told you before. One question, on this
"there is no atmosphere on the moon so you would not get billowing clouds of dust like you'd get on Earth."
What does the LEM do to soft land on the moon? If there is no atmosphere, what would it thrust push against? It wouldn't be able to push against the surface until coming very close to it, seems too late to me, and parachutes would not work of course with no atmosphere. Maybe on Mars parachutes would have some value and if landers were encased in a bubble that would bounce until stationary.
Later, and take your time, sorry it's a lot of work, can you debunk this vid, some of the points may or may not be true so those points are not bunkable nor debunkable so you can skip them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=xciCJfbTvE4
Anyway, I know you know a lot about this so that would be helpful-only if you are interested for a future post, don't do it just for me!
The "astronauts" can't even quickly agree on whether or not they can see stars from the moon. NASA in Hebrew means 'to deceive'. I don't see how anybody could watch this and still believe they went to the moon. And they claim to have "lost" the telemetry data they used to get there. The comedy of errors and gafs are too numerous to mention.
NASA Fails Again & Again
https://rumble.com/v29e0ri-nasa-fails-again-and-again-space-is-fake-glitch-on-the-iss-.html
I don’t understand Petra writing in her September 2023 blog: “ it was the audio recordings of the astronauts to Mission control that first convinced me of the reality of the moon landings”. Audio recordings can’t be faked? Oh yes they can!
James McCanney says that several cosmonauts and animals sent through the Van Allen belt came back "cooked", according to Soviet sources that cited it as the reason why they terminated their space program.
Petra, you’re the first person I’ve seen to say 9/11 was fake but moon landings were real. It takes all kinds! I think it’s much easier to doubt the moon landings as there’s much less evidence of “independent” verification to be discarded. That is, no “amateur videos” of any moon landing, no civilian “eyewitness accounts” of any astronaut stepping on the moon.
And then there is Clif High's Deep Woo Woo stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z78fcGbtZ94