Great post Petra! Well no one "works" at the CFR, you may be an "asset" for the CFR or a member. But to me, how can he not be writhing on the ground or running away, sure monks have nerves of steel but their involuntary nervous system isn't made of steel. The monks behind the car don't seem the same in the close up and the petrol jar just happens to fall so you can see what the flames did, and he douses himself and then quietly puts the jar standing upright like an underarm deodorant commercial? I don't have a bunker on mars to sell anymore, I have an entire complex of bunkers to sell now.
I found this post thanks to Proton Magic and just subscribed! The thought of self-immolations being faked, never crossed my mind until now! Illusions and distractions, what the world consists off I tell you: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-whats-real-in-the-land
Well the image was used by the band Rage Against the Machine You know how fake Tom Morello turned out to be embracing the woke narrative and totalitarianism of the Covid psyop. Where was the rage? Tom raged against fans who wanted freedom from the poison jabs.
regarding the two photos of the burning monk it’s difficult to tell if there’s movement or a different camera angle.
One thing that says fake to me is the obvious different distances between the burning monk and the gas can/strange object. In the second photo the object is much closer to the monk.
Also it makes no sense to me that the gas can would implode, surely if the heat was to cause vapor in the can to ignite it would explode not implode. If otoh it’s meant to have buckled from the heat there’s features missing that wouldn’t buckle.
Any deficiencies in the video were easily fixed with Photoshop.
The biggest giveaway is that a phone that was supposedly taking the video from the ground looks like it was a couple of feet above it, judging by the angle of the shot.
I think the simple way to tell that all these self-immolations, especially the recent one, are fake is what you touched upon about the subject/victim would be writhing around - in other words, simple medical science tells us the truth.
Reaction to fire/heat is an innate, autonomic self-defence response. Try putting your hand near a flame or very hot object and this is obvious. It cannot be controlled consciously except perhaps by one of two ways:
1/ years and years and years of meditative guru monk shit - but even then you would have to spend many of those years specifically focusing on overcoming and consciously controlling your autonomic system - in which case the obvious question is why? for what possible purpose?! I very much doubt that Monk thought, when he was, I dunno, twelve, that 'I'm going to spend the next thirty years overcoming my innate protective response mechanism so I can carry out a pointless, politically ineffective self-immolation process when the nasty yanks arrive'
or 2/ Very serious MK-Ultra-style programming. Even then however, it's one thing to, say, hypnotise a person so they don't 'feel' the pain, but preventing the autonomic response is another thing entirely. You would have to create some kind of autonomic dissociation, or use some kind of pharmaceutical or electromagnetic thing to disrupt the innate response. That's definitely an interesting MK sub-project and I'd be very surprised indeed if they hadn't done experiments on it - especially with regards to creating super-soldiers and all that.
I don't believe there's any evidence of Bushnell being 1/, and obviously I don't know about 2/. but we shouldn't discount the possibility that Bushnell was either wittingly or unwittingly involved in an MK sub-project.
Having said all that, why would one go to all that trouble? Occam's razor again suggests they take the most efficient and easiest way to produce the desired effect, and that's just deepfake it. Or they get Bushnell to believe he's set himself on fire, add the flames using CGI, take him away after 40 seconds or so and disappear him. So it's a combination of CGI fakery and MK shit. That's an elegant method, for sure. All they need to do is ensure there are no witnesses in the vicinity who aren't in on it.
I think doing real life tests for their ongoing MK programs is, however, a very important part of their project, and if I were the kind of personality involved in that project then I'd definitely want to try it out.
Im not saying that I disagree with the critique of this self immolation. And I'll absolutely agree that anything can, and often is, faked these days. But to specifically answer the question as to the setting alight issue: when he pours the excellerant over his head, vertually no e of it hits his legs, where he attempts to set the fire. Much of it does fall on the floor by his feet however, which would explain the decision to invite it there. As for everything else you point out, I have only questions.
A physical phenomenon is only “a thing” if you desire to believe it is. Noumena rule; phenomena drool. (Only YOU know if this is serious or this is snark.)
Fascinating. Thank you Petra, you have given name to a 'thing' that I have been wondering about for some time - Revelation of Method. In recent years I have been struck by strange coincidences in popular culture and the 'let the right one in' rule of parasites. Hmmm....
Great post Petra! Well no one "works" at the CFR, you may be an "asset" for the CFR or a member. But to me, how can he not be writhing on the ground or running away, sure monks have nerves of steel but their involuntary nervous system isn't made of steel. The monks behind the car don't seem the same in the close up and the petrol jar just happens to fall so you can see what the flames did, and he douses himself and then quietly puts the jar standing upright like an underarm deodorant commercial? I don't have a bunker on mars to sell anymore, I have an entire complex of bunkers to sell now.
I found this post thanks to Proton Magic and just subscribed! The thought of self-immolations being faked, never crossed my mind until now! Illusions and distractions, what the world consists off I tell you: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-whats-real-in-the-land
Well the image was used by the band Rage Against the Machine You know how fake Tom Morello turned out to be embracing the woke narrative and totalitarianism of the Covid psyop. Where was the rage? Tom raged against fans who wanted freedom from the poison jabs.
regarding the two photos of the burning monk it’s difficult to tell if there’s movement or a different camera angle.
One thing that says fake to me is the obvious different distances between the burning monk and the gas can/strange object. In the second photo the object is much closer to the monk.
Also it makes no sense to me that the gas can would implode, surely if the heat was to cause vapor in the can to ignite it would explode not implode. If otoh it’s meant to have buckled from the heat there’s features missing that wouldn’t buckle.
Any deficiencies in the video were easily fixed with Photoshop.
The biggest giveaway is that a phone that was supposedly taking the video from the ground looks like it was a couple of feet above it, judging by the angle of the shot.
I think the simple way to tell that all these self-immolations, especially the recent one, are fake is what you touched upon about the subject/victim would be writhing around - in other words, simple medical science tells us the truth.
Reaction to fire/heat is an innate, autonomic self-defence response. Try putting your hand near a flame or very hot object and this is obvious. It cannot be controlled consciously except perhaps by one of two ways:
1/ years and years and years of meditative guru monk shit - but even then you would have to spend many of those years specifically focusing on overcoming and consciously controlling your autonomic system - in which case the obvious question is why? for what possible purpose?! I very much doubt that Monk thought, when he was, I dunno, twelve, that 'I'm going to spend the next thirty years overcoming my innate protective response mechanism so I can carry out a pointless, politically ineffective self-immolation process when the nasty yanks arrive'
or 2/ Very serious MK-Ultra-style programming. Even then however, it's one thing to, say, hypnotise a person so they don't 'feel' the pain, but preventing the autonomic response is another thing entirely. You would have to create some kind of autonomic dissociation, or use some kind of pharmaceutical or electromagnetic thing to disrupt the innate response. That's definitely an interesting MK sub-project and I'd be very surprised indeed if they hadn't done experiments on it - especially with regards to creating super-soldiers and all that.
I don't believe there's any evidence of Bushnell being 1/, and obviously I don't know about 2/. but we shouldn't discount the possibility that Bushnell was either wittingly or unwittingly involved in an MK sub-project.
Having said all that, why would one go to all that trouble? Occam's razor again suggests they take the most efficient and easiest way to produce the desired effect, and that's just deepfake it. Or they get Bushnell to believe he's set himself on fire, add the flames using CGI, take him away after 40 seconds or so and disappear him. So it's a combination of CGI fakery and MK shit. That's an elegant method, for sure. All they need to do is ensure there are no witnesses in the vicinity who aren't in on it.
I think doing real life tests for their ongoing MK programs is, however, a very important part of their project, and if I were the kind of personality involved in that project then I'd definitely want to try it out.
Im not saying that I disagree with the critique of this self immolation. And I'll absolutely agree that anything can, and often is, faked these days. But to specifically answer the question as to the setting alight issue: when he pours the excellerant over his head, vertually no e of it hits his legs, where he attempts to set the fire. Much of it does fall on the floor by his feet however, which would explain the decision to invite it there. As for everything else you point out, I have only questions.
A physical phenomenon is only “a thing” if you desire to believe it is. Noumena rule; phenomena drool. (Only YOU know if this is serious or this is snark.)
Great stack...pointy questions!
Fascinating. Thank you Petra, you have given name to a 'thing' that I have been wondering about for some time - Revelation of Method. In recent years I have been struck by strange coincidences in popular culture and the 'let the right one in' rule of parasites. Hmmm....
very nice work!