My belief is that a pretty solid evacuation of the areas affected occurred and that knowing in advance what was going to happen they turned it into a televised exercise to a certain degree. This doesn't take away from the destruction to people's homes and obviously to lose one's home or suffer a lot of damage in this way is awful - if this fakery raises money to help people get their lives back on track it is certainly not the worst implementation of fakery but fakery is my thing and I'm pointing it out anyway - it's not as if it's going to change anything. Also, I find it difficult to believe that no one has died but who knows how good the evacuation was.
What strikes me as anomalous is a dearth of clear footage of people actually being rescued.
In this interview the reporter asks the "angel", Matthew:
"What prompted you to go and check in on that family."
Matthew: "It was a gut feeling. I had intended on leaving and going home and enjoying the rest of my day ..."
Reporter to Chrissie:
"What went through your head when you heard a stranger screaming at your home in the middle of the night?"
If it was the middle of the night how could Matthew have been thinking about enjoying the rest of his day?
Also, in the middle of the night there were signs of rain and flooding and there had been warnings so the scenario of a "stranger screaming at one's home" doesn't really fit.
The route of escape also sounds strange: over the chain link fence to their pickup truck and then from the pickup truck to their neighbour's yard.
The reporter then asks about Chrissie's daughter slipping and says "I think her name's Dove". Chrissie replies with what sounds like "Maiyan, my daughter ... nearly went down the river with my car. Her brother Dove (pronounced Dohve) ... "
Seriously, she has a son called Dove pronounced Dohve.
Am dubious about the story below:
Interview with people involved in the rescue of a 22 year-old woman from a tree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9MpE1BVnWE. Snippet of actual rescue - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txqPXKeg79c. The tiny amount of footage showing the actual rescue looks real, however, I wonder at the snippet being so short and - what seems to me - truly miraculous ability of the woman to be carried in a flash-flooding river 20 miles and then being able to cling to a tree for a period of over 4 hours.
Just to think: AI can even make up a flood, can make posts, comments and people being interviewed online saying they saw the flood. AI can do all of the above to make a worse flood on top of a real flood.
👉I'm not arguing this flood in part or in all was made up.
The possibility of fakery crossed my mind, but I have no way to tell. I am concerned, however, with how the various AI services are able to report on current news. This would seem to indicate that we have the possibility of AI collecting "information" from AI, itself or other services, in real time. This is something about which warnings were given, and I suspect caution has been thrown to the wind.
It's not out of the realm of possibility. Unfortunately, however, AI can pretty much "lose its mind" if fed a steady diet of AI-generated, error-filled, garbage.
People also tend to go downhill when they eat a garbage-filled diet of adulterated industrial "food", and they do mostly eat such. And it does make them sick. Nutrient deficient, laced and fortified with poisons, cheap and convenient industrial food.
The deceptions run so deep. "Liberals" especially are moaning that federal budget cuts are going to deny "healthcare benefits" to millions, not understanding that poor health is a cash cow for the "healthcare" industry, and that restricting access to "healthcare" has potential health benefits for some people. For those that are already sick and depending on the system to keep going, bad news. For those that are not seriously ill from it, potentially good news if they stop vaxxing and eating garbage industrial food. But that's a mighty big "if".
Thanks, Metta. I didn't have any doubts about the flood although that's slightly implied in my article and the other information in your comments is most enlightening and I thank you for that.
Nevertheless I'm still a little dubious about the dead and missing despite the clear visuals of the flooding. There's been bad flooding in northern NSW in recent years - but not flash flooding - and there is significant footage of people being rescued. Perhaps with a flash flood the rescue situation is different and that explains the dearth of footage of actual rescue and people clinging to trees and sitting on their rooves.
Below are videos about rescue but with no footage of the actual rescue taking place. I must say the first one shows a man who seems to ramble a bit and doesn't make very good sense - and you'd wonder why no footage of the rescue situation at all considering it took some time to happen and a number of people were involved.
What I will say is though that if people aren't dead and missing then the situation was handled incredibly well and if they did manage to avoid death and people going missing it's a real shame that this very good management of a disastrous situation isn't recognised.
I shall do more research. On the one hand I find it hard to believe that people haven't died and on the other I wonder about certain anomalies in the reporting and seeming lack of actual rescue footage - although that might be a case of me just missing it.
Thank you. That's what I am hearing from other witnesses now as well. I think it is wise to question whether fakery is involved, but to decide the matter using evidence as it becomes available. I don't, however, mean to imply that this is always a simple process.
I live 1 hour away. Camp Mystic is well known. Many of the Texas summer camps are in this area. This is a very, very unusual flood. Here in San Antonio, we are having a very unusually rainy summer. Usually we have a drought. This is a real and organic but horrible flash flood.
Thank you for that information. Even though a flash flood is it necessarily true there was no warning I wonder. The thing is that there are strange things in the reporting that do make one question, eg, why would they report 27 children missing from a summer camp with no mention of the camp counselors?
The problem in this flood prone region is that everyone loves to hangout at, or live beside, one of the many rivers here. Tubing slowly down the river on a hot summer day is one of Texans' favorite past times. It's also a great way to celebrate the 4th of July.
And, since the flash floods come only now and then, its easy for people to ignore the risks. This means there are recreational areas and camp sites and even homes situated along the banks these flood prone rivers.
That's a big part of the reason why the tragedy was so great this time 'round.
If you've never lived in flash flood territory, it is hard to imagine why there was no warning. This is because the waters rise unimaginably fast, in this case *30 feet* in just one hour.
Plus, in the hardest hit recreational area, where the camp grounds were located, this raging rising water occurred at night, when almost everyone was sleeping. People were literally washed out of their beds.
The following 2 videos provide a great reality check about what the rising waters of a flash flood actually look like. HIGHLY recommended:
There were over 800 girls at the camp, with all the counselors you would expect for a group of this size. At this time, there is one camp counselor who is still missing.
One local report I saw from a girl who survived indicated the flood came so hard and so fast they were literally washed out of the dorms where they were sleeping once the doors were opened.
Yes, unusually wet and cool this year. But Texas typically swings from several drought years to some extreme weather events that eventually refill our lakes ~ often very rapidly.
Communities in this part of the state have massive engineering projects, including a dam in San Antonio, to manage the sudden and unexpected runoff from the flash floods.
In the fact, the dam in San Antonio is usually dry ~ until it's not, and then during a flash flood, it can come close to filling up, until the water eventually drains off again in the following days/weeks.
I actually bought flood insurance here in San Antonio, which felt crazy at the time. We lived in Houston at the time, and our house had 2 feet of water during Harvey.
Yeah. The hurricanes can wreak havoc on the Texas coast.
Back when I was child, hurricane Carla was a massive storm that hit Texas, and all the way up in San Antonio the glass sliding door in our family was hammered *hard* by horizontal rain for what seemed like hours.
I also remember, as an adult, when Olmos dam in SA filled up with 21+ feet of water after one of the really bad flash floods.
Not enough people have flood insurance in this part of the state, IMHO.
My BFF lives in the Dallas area. When I called her yesterday to ask about this she said the floods in that area happen every year. She was blasé. But.....we in Ohio have had an unusually rainy, wet spring also. And why endanger people by putting camps, especially children's camps in an area that floods frequently?
I live in the Dallas area also, but have taken many trips during many summers to "float the Guadalupe" and I feel blasé about the floods, too, because we're not really hearing much about it here. Which is weird, since it's a few hours away. I'm a sixth generation Texan with quite a bit of family in the hill country, and I've never heard the term "flash flood alley" until right now, so I think that's a bit overstated.
There are a lot of camps along the river because it's a river! It comes from an ice cold spring so the water is always very chilly, which is really nice in the hot Texas summers. And the water usually flows at a very slow, lazy-river pace (sometimes you have to get up and walk your tube across parts where it's too dry to float) so people flock there. It's really fun! Just trying to give some context to your comments. It's not necessarily unreasonable for the girls camp to be where it was, but from what I'm hearing, every other camp in that immediate area chose to evacuate the day before this happened due to warnings issued from NWS, but mystic decided to stay. And they were again warned of imminent threat at least a couple hours before it happened, so not sure why they still stayed. So many questions.
I tend to give better than 50% probability that any "news" story is "dog wagging." In the sense that it is devised to cast those sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us. It was when a friend had something happen down the street from Him that I raised those probabilities higher.
He had a neighbor who hired a caretaker for the 1/2 acre lot His home was on. The caretaker lived in a trailer on the property.
One day the caretaker grabbed the wife of the neighbor and held Her hostage in the trailer. Lots of police showed up and My friend got some footage of what was going on.
Finally, after hours, the caretaker let the wife go and then, using the propane, blew Himself and the trailer up.
Well... My friend was sure this incident would put His little suburb on the map. He eagerly waited for the evening news. But... It did not show up on the national news, and... It did not show up on the LOCAL news!
So. A real event went unreported - and it was no small event! But They tell Us things happen, with significant numbers and gematria, and the probability that all of them have these features is pretty low.
Thus I give good probability that what We see on the cave wall (Our screens) is 100% manufactured to manipulate Us.
(I see 33 comments here now... Guess Mine will be #34. LOL!)
That's very interesting, AS - I think I've seen you report this incident before - not that it's not worth repeating at any relevant moment. Maybe they find it less effort ultimately to fabricate events. They need to do "live" exercises anyway so rather than do the "live" exercises AND send out journalists to do real stories they just stick with the "live" exercises. Who knows why they don't report the real events - it's easy to understand why they fabricate them but you'd think they'd want to do a story on an event such as your friend experienced as it was certainly a newsworthy event.
It is FAR cheaper and more controllable to manufacture the "news." No relatives who might file suits, no real witnesses to argue facts, etc. The movie, Wag the Dog, was a big clue.
Or it could be that God hates America and rightfully so. And we're one week away from the fake Trump assassination X2. October 7, 2023 fake. Intentionally bombing Iran's nuclear plants fake. Feb. 29 2020 fake virus unleashed on the world and on and on with these THINGS.
I can't see any of the other comments so forgive me if this is redundant. I haven't really heard anything about this and I live in Texas. I'm not saying it's not on the news, but in real life I haven't heard anything about all these missing girls, and that's the kind of thing people talk about. I'm not saying it's false, but I am saying the other videos you shared in your comment aren't really proof of anything, either. The key takeaway here it's really fucked up we should even question these types of news stories, yet here we are. That's what happens when we're fed lies on repeat.
I'm not saying the Uvalde school was fake, either, but I am saying this feels eerily similar. IDK about everywhere else, but in Texas, somebody always knows somebody involved in something like this, and I don't know anybody who knew anybody from either of those events. No one was talking about what their cousin said, none of the cops I know had any buddies telling them what was happening... It's just really weird for these massive (on the news, anyway) tragedies to exist in a vacuum.
Thanks for that first hand perspective from someone living in Texas.
I've reviewed the first video I put a link to and it doesn't seem rambling and nonsensical as I thought on my first casual viewing. Nevertheless I still find it implausible that a young woman (and we have her rather dubious age of 22) got taken 20 miles down a flash-flooding river and was able to cling to a tree - for a total period of over 4 hours. The video referred to is shown in another news story shown in this snippet here. The footage seems so minimal considering the opportunity to film the rescue. But miracles do genuinely happen - it's not that I don't believe in miracles, I do. Just not psyop miracles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txqPXKeg79c
I haven't looked at Uvalde but I've certainly see a lot of people call it out as fake. I started watching this video and it sure looks fake at first sight. https://www.bitchute.com/video/KHvvH8QLc94u/
very good to bring this up. sending and receiving information, both bogus and real, seems to have become a battle ground. warnings have indeed been given by those who understood eaarly on the possible abuse of Ai and we're now in the middle of it. what goes around, comes around (HT Jordan Maxwell).
thank you for posting! the many magick numbers in this chain are difficult to ignore and, literally, quite incredible, as in - Noem: 223 people rescued (22x3=66); Authorities: at least 27 people dead (2+7=9); National Weather Service: flooding causes an average of 125 deaths per year (125 = 12x5=60)
is there a message beneath this messaging, one wonders.
Total rookie question with the numbers: seems many ways to break them down and I get so confused on the numberology of the whole thing and the powers that be that use the numbers...which numbers are most suspect?
They seem to like doubled numbers, like 11, 22, 33, 44 etc. (they're important in esoterica). Notice also these numbers can be disguised, e.g. 33 can be 3x3 (9) or 3+3 (6).
Then there's anything to do with 6. Plus derivates or multiples etc. (e.g. 18 is 3x6).
Essentially, for numerology (also known as 'reducing' numbers usually to get a single digit, although sometimes a double), you basically just separate each digit in a number. Random example: 59386 - 5-9-3-8-6. You can then just play around with them. This is especially important when you consider 'metadata' - i.e. dates and times etc.
Then there's the most basic substitution code, namely a=1, b=2, c=3 etc.
In numerology sometimes one would reduce a number to 2 digits. Then we say it's the second number acting through the first. Each of the first 9 digits has a particular meaning, and also involves a progression. Once you get to 9 you would then go on to 10, which is 1+0=1, so you start again.
Some people, like Miles Mathis, seem to think that 'aces and eights' are important - i.e. 1 or 11, and the number 8. Personally I think that's silly. Although 18 is The Moon in the Tarot, which refers to hidden, dark stuff, which may be revealed by the light of the moon etc. Also refers to the unconscious.
Most of the time, IMO, the numbers don't actually mean anything, it's just the bad guys fucking with people.
Another occult option is you can relate the first 78 numbers to a specific tarot card, as there are 78 in a tarot deck - 22 major arcana, then 56 minor. In this system the Fool, which is usually card zero in the arcana, would be designated 22 (again, you can cycle through them, going back to the beginning after).
Maybe I should do an article about it.
There is also the caveat that we are dealing with the decimal system here, and as such statistically speaking it's eminently possible to get some meaning out of any randomly selected numbers. So it should all be taken with a pinch of salt really.
It seems like people find meaning in literally any number. They'll justify it somehow. I'm not doubting numerology but I'm doubting most interpretations of it. EVERYTHING can't have meaning or else nothing has meaning.
Thank you, my add or adhd leaves me befuddled when all the numbers are thrown out. This helps :-) I'll leave it to the experts to dissect this all but I really appreciate your input...I'm sure you see patterns once you know what to look for :)
Unless you were physically there? hard, in this digitized "reality" of electronic sight (video) and sound (audio), to ascertain if what supposedly happened...happened. We know that worldwide mass media is hopelessly biased and compromised. So, wise (Sophia) not to hold fast to any particular perspective or concept. Regardless potential obscuration, there exists a Ground of Being and path to spiritual Life that transcends human materiality based on objective personal development, freedom and love.
Most likely solar radiation management, aka geoengineering, aka weather warfare. It is the crown jewel of the military industrial complex. Floods in one area, extreme drought in others. A country, state or city can be under attack by their own gubmint and the folks don't even know it.
They blame climate change and it helps push their green agendas. There are multiple agendas that can be debated. What cannot be debated is the tic tak toe streaking going on over our heads leaving white trails that are explained away as contrails.
The droughts lead to tinder like conditions that are the root cause of the catastrophic wildfires we are seeing. The firefighters will say they've never seen fires like this. They are either uninformed or lying about not knowing the root cause.
All of this leads to crop failures. No food equals no people. Isn't that the bottom line? In the meantime, they profit from disaster capitalism, i.e. $$$ made on other people's misery or loss of life. For more info, geoengineerinwatch.org with Dane Wigington
My belief is that a pretty solid evacuation of the areas affected occurred and that knowing in advance what was going to happen they turned it into a televised exercise to a certain degree. This doesn't take away from the destruction to people's homes and obviously to lose one's home or suffer a lot of damage in this way is awful - if this fakery raises money to help people get their lives back on track it is certainly not the worst implementation of fakery but fakery is my thing and I'm pointing it out anyway - it's not as if it's going to change anything. Also, I find it difficult to believe that no one has died but who knows how good the evacuation was.
What strikes me as anomalous is a dearth of clear footage of people actually being rescued.
Clear example of Revelation of the Method:
'Angel on this earth': Family reunites with hero who saved them from Texas floods - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx21t5DPWz4
In this interview the reporter asks the "angel", Matthew:
"What prompted you to go and check in on that family."
Matthew: "It was a gut feeling. I had intended on leaving and going home and enjoying the rest of my day ..."
Reporter to Chrissie:
"What went through your head when you heard a stranger screaming at your home in the middle of the night?"
If it was the middle of the night how could Matthew have been thinking about enjoying the rest of his day?
Also, in the middle of the night there were signs of rain and flooding and there had been warnings so the scenario of a "stranger screaming at one's home" doesn't really fit.
The route of escape also sounds strange: over the chain link fence to their pickup truck and then from the pickup truck to their neighbour's yard.
The reporter then asks about Chrissie's daughter slipping and says "I think her name's Dove". Chrissie replies with what sounds like "Maiyan, my daughter ... nearly went down the river with my car. Her brother Dove (pronounced Dohve) ... "
Seriously, she has a son called Dove pronounced Dohve.
Am dubious about the story below:
Interview with people involved in the rescue of a 22 year-old woman from a tree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9MpE1BVnWE. Snippet of actual rescue - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txqPXKeg79c. The tiny amount of footage showing the actual rescue looks real, however, I wonder at the snippet being so short and - what seems to me - truly miraculous ability of the woman to be carried in a flash-flooding river 20 miles and then being able to cling to a tree for a period of over 4 hours.
People emerging from a rescue boat - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxdjYEaL_z4
Various clips - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R_4VQuBRJs
Post in FB of people on car rooves, etc but fakery pointed out in the comments - https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1305337057614604&set=pcb.1305337154281261
Just to think: AI can even make up a flood, can make posts, comments and people being interviewed online saying they saw the flood. AI can do all of the above to make a worse flood on top of a real flood.
👉I'm not arguing this flood in part or in all was made up.
I stand with YOU on this questioning.
The possibility of fakery crossed my mind, but I have no way to tell. I am concerned, however, with how the various AI services are able to report on current news. This would seem to indicate that we have the possibility of AI collecting "information" from AI, itself or other services, in real time. This is something about which warnings were given, and I suspect caution has been thrown to the wind.
Maybe AI will collect Petra's questions too and add them to round out for a bit of width and depth appearance.
Especially if enough of us comment.
The thought amuses me.
Of course we have learnt to not jump to the conclusion that MSM headlines.
Maybe so, maybe not so.
It's not out of the realm of possibility. Unfortunately, however, AI can pretty much "lose its mind" if fed a steady diet of AI-generated, error-filled, garbage.
People also tend to go downhill when they eat a garbage-filled diet of adulterated industrial "food", and they do mostly eat such. And it does make them sick. Nutrient deficient, laced and fortified with poisons, cheap and convenient industrial food.
The deceptions run so deep. "Liberals" especially are moaning that federal budget cuts are going to deny "healthcare benefits" to millions, not understanding that poor health is a cash cow for the "healthcare" industry, and that restricting access to "healthcare" has potential health benefits for some people. For those that are already sick and depending on the system to keep going, bad news. For those that are not seriously ill from it, potentially good news if they stop vaxxing and eating garbage industrial food. But that's a mighty big "if".
What a mess.
Garbage In = Garbage Out = AI Model Collapse
> https://bra.in/5qV4GE
AI algorithms are simply opinions embedded in code. Plus AI hallucinates ~ and lies.
I wouldn't ever trust it for anything even remotely approximating a 'fact':
> https://bra.in/6vPkRJ
I'm in Austin. The floods were *real* ~ and unimaginably fast:
> Timelapse: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1438861630331272
> From the beginning: https://youtu.be/0kYjiTEDqtw
Thanks, Metta. I didn't have any doubts about the flood although that's slightly implied in my article and the other information in your comments is most enlightening and I thank you for that.
Nevertheless I'm still a little dubious about the dead and missing despite the clear visuals of the flooding. There's been bad flooding in northern NSW in recent years - but not flash flooding - and there is significant footage of people being rescued. Perhaps with a flash flood the rescue situation is different and that explains the dearth of footage of actual rescue and people clinging to trees and sitting on their rooves.
Below are videos about rescue but with no footage of the actual rescue taking place. I must say the first one shows a man who seems to ramble a bit and doesn't make very good sense - and you'd wonder why no footage of the rescue situation at all considering it took some time to happen and a number of people were involved.
What I will say is though that if people aren't dead and missing then the situation was handled incredibly well and if they did manage to avoid death and people going missing it's a real shame that this very good management of a disastrous situation isn't recognised.
Rescue of woman from a tree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9MpE1BVnWE
People emerging from a rescue boat - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxdjYEaL_z4
Various clips - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R_4VQuBRJs
Post in FB of people on car rooves, etc but fakery pointed out - https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1305337057614604&set=pcb.1305337154281261
I shall do more research. On the one hand I find it hard to believe that people haven't died and on the other I wonder about certain anomalies in the reporting and seeming lack of actual rescue footage - although that might be a case of me just missing it.
Thank you. That's what I am hearing from other witnesses now as well. I think it is wise to question whether fakery is involved, but to decide the matter using evidence as it becomes available. I don't, however, mean to imply that this is always a simple process.
I live 1 hour away. Camp Mystic is well known. Many of the Texas summer camps are in this area. This is a very, very unusual flood. Here in San Antonio, we are having a very unusually rainy summer. Usually we have a drought. This is a real and organic but horrible flash flood.
Thank you for that information. Even though a flash flood is it necessarily true there was no warning I wonder. The thing is that there are strange things in the reporting that do make one question, eg, why would they report 27 children missing from a summer camp with no mention of the camp counselors?
Yes, where camp counselors were at the time and what they did later would be a normal way to report such an event.
So much weather modification that past weather records are not predictive.
I agree with Petra though that the valley being named "Flash Flood Alley" was a warning.
How much due diligence do parents need to do? Busy parents doing their best.
Often the mothers and grandmothers went to Camp Mystic. It is a well known camp.
The problem in this flood prone region is that everyone loves to hangout at, or live beside, one of the many rivers here. Tubing slowly down the river on a hot summer day is one of Texans' favorite past times. It's also a great way to celebrate the 4th of July.
And, since the flash floods come only now and then, its easy for people to ignore the risks. This means there are recreational areas and camp sites and even homes situated along the banks these flood prone rivers.
That's a big part of the reason why the tragedy was so great this time 'round.
A note about the homes along the rivers. Many of them are actually built on *stilts* since the flash flooding here is so common ~ and so dangerous.
If you've never lived in flash flood territory, it is hard to imagine why there was no warning. This is because the waters rise unimaginably fast, in this case *30 feet* in just one hour.
Plus, in the hardest hit recreational area, where the camp grounds were located, this raging rising water occurred at night, when almost everyone was sleeping. People were literally washed out of their beds.
The following 2 videos provide a great reality check about what the rising waters of a flash flood actually look like. HIGHLY recommended:
> Timelapse: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1438861630331272
> From the beginning: https://youtu.be/0kYjiTEDqtw
There were over 800 girls at the camp, with all the counselors you would expect for a group of this size. At this time, there is one camp counselor who is still missing.
One local report I saw from a girl who survived indicated the flood came so hard and so fast they were literally washed out of the dorms where they were sleeping once the doors were opened.
The counselors do not stay in the same cabins as the campers.
OK but they can't be too far away and it seems odd not to mention them to me.
There were 800 girls attending the camp. It’s a big place.
I see. That puts a different perspective on things.
Other people from other locations were also swept away, not just girls from the camp.
Yes, unusually wet and cool this year. But Texas typically swings from several drought years to some extreme weather events that eventually refill our lakes ~ often very rapidly.
Communities in this part of the state have massive engineering projects, including a dam in San Antonio, to manage the sudden and unexpected runoff from the flash floods.
In the fact, the dam in San Antonio is usually dry ~ until it's not, and then during a flash flood, it can come close to filling up, until the water eventually drains off again in the following days/weeks.
I actually bought flood insurance here in San Antonio, which felt crazy at the time. We lived in Houston at the time, and our house had 2 feet of water during Harvey.
2 feet of water! What did you do?
Mold is such a problem in Houston, I can't imagine how the house would even be salvageable.
Also, did you decide to move to SA after the Harvey disaster?
Yeah. The hurricanes can wreak havoc on the Texas coast.
Back when I was child, hurricane Carla was a massive storm that hit Texas, and all the way up in San Antonio the glass sliding door in our family was hammered *hard* by horizontal rain for what seemed like hours.
I also remember, as an adult, when Olmos dam in SA filled up with 21+ feet of water after one of the really bad flash floods.
Not enough people have flood insurance in this part of the state, IMHO.
My BFF lives in the Dallas area. When I called her yesterday to ask about this she said the floods in that area happen every year. She was blasé. But.....we in Ohio have had an unusually rainy, wet spring also. And why endanger people by putting camps, especially children's camps in an area that floods frequently?
Could be because of cheap real estate.
No one wants to build expensive houses.
I don't think that camping there is going to be so popular in the future.
Maybe have rice paddies.
*where they send their daughters
I live in the Dallas area also, but have taken many trips during many summers to "float the Guadalupe" and I feel blasé about the floods, too, because we're not really hearing much about it here. Which is weird, since it's a few hours away. I'm a sixth generation Texan with quite a bit of family in the hill country, and I've never heard the term "flash flood alley" until right now, so I think that's a bit overstated.
There are a lot of camps along the river because it's a river! It comes from an ice cold spring so the water is always very chilly, which is really nice in the hot Texas summers. And the water usually flows at a very slow, lazy-river pace (sometimes you have to get up and walk your tube across parts where it's too dry to float) so people flock there. It's really fun! Just trying to give some context to your comments. It's not necessarily unreasonable for the girls camp to be where it was, but from what I'm hearing, every other camp in that immediate area chose to evacuate the day before this happened due to warnings issued from NWS, but mystic decided to stay. And they were again warned of imminent threat at least a couple hours before it happened, so not sure why they still stayed. So many questions.
Thank you for writing this. It was so very descriptive. You have added a lot.
I tend to give better than 50% probability that any "news" story is "dog wagging." In the sense that it is devised to cast those sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us. It was when a friend had something happen down the street from Him that I raised those probabilities higher.
He had a neighbor who hired a caretaker for the 1/2 acre lot His home was on. The caretaker lived in a trailer on the property.
One day the caretaker grabbed the wife of the neighbor and held Her hostage in the trailer. Lots of police showed up and My friend got some footage of what was going on.
Finally, after hours, the caretaker let the wife go and then, using the propane, blew Himself and the trailer up.
Well... My friend was sure this incident would put His little suburb on the map. He eagerly waited for the evening news. But... It did not show up on the national news, and... It did not show up on the LOCAL news!
So. A real event went unreported - and it was no small event! But They tell Us things happen, with significant numbers and gematria, and the probability that all of them have these features is pretty low.
Thus I give good probability that what We see on the cave wall (Our screens) is 100% manufactured to manipulate Us.
(I see 33 comments here now... Guess Mine will be #34. LOL!)
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
That's very interesting, AS - I think I've seen you report this incident before - not that it's not worth repeating at any relevant moment. Maybe they find it less effort ultimately to fabricate events. They need to do "live" exercises anyway so rather than do the "live" exercises AND send out journalists to do real stories they just stick with the "live" exercises. Who knows why they don't report the real events - it's easy to understand why they fabricate them but you'd think they'd want to do a story on an event such as your friend experienced as it was certainly a newsworthy event.
It is FAR cheaper and more controllable to manufacture the "news." No relatives who might file suits, no real witnesses to argue facts, etc. The movie, Wag the Dog, was a big clue.
Or it could be that God hates America and rightfully so. And we're one week away from the fake Trump assassination X2. October 7, 2023 fake. Intentionally bombing Iran's nuclear plants fake. Feb. 29 2020 fake virus unleashed on the world and on and on with these THINGS.
Exactly. We're so inundated with them.
I can't see any of the other comments so forgive me if this is redundant. I haven't really heard anything about this and I live in Texas. I'm not saying it's not on the news, but in real life I haven't heard anything about all these missing girls, and that's the kind of thing people talk about. I'm not saying it's false, but I am saying the other videos you shared in your comment aren't really proof of anything, either. The key takeaway here it's really fucked up we should even question these types of news stories, yet here we are. That's what happens when we're fed lies on repeat.
I'm not saying the Uvalde school was fake, either, but I am saying this feels eerily similar. IDK about everywhere else, but in Texas, somebody always knows somebody involved in something like this, and I don't know anybody who knew anybody from either of those events. No one was talking about what their cousin said, none of the cops I know had any buddies telling them what was happening... It's just really weird for these massive (on the news, anyway) tragedies to exist in a vacuum.
Thanks for that first hand perspective from someone living in Texas.
I've reviewed the first video I put a link to and it doesn't seem rambling and nonsensical as I thought on my first casual viewing. Nevertheless I still find it implausible that a young woman (and we have her rather dubious age of 22) got taken 20 miles down a flash-flooding river and was able to cling to a tree - for a total period of over 4 hours. The video referred to is shown in another news story shown in this snippet here. The footage seems so minimal considering the opportunity to film the rescue. But miracles do genuinely happen - it's not that I don't believe in miracles, I do. Just not psyop miracles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txqPXKeg79c
I haven't looked at Uvalde but I've certainly see a lot of people call it out as fake. I started watching this video and it sure looks fake at first sight. https://www.bitchute.com/video/KHvvH8QLc94u/
very good to bring this up. sending and receiving information, both bogus and real, seems to have become a battle ground. warnings have indeed been given by those who understood eaarly on the possible abuse of Ai and we're now in the middle of it. what goes around, comes around (HT Jordan Maxwell).
As an Sk.D I applaud your questioning. Check this: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/texas-floods-live-updates-rcna217030#rcrd84309
thank you for posting! the many magick numbers in this chain are difficult to ignore and, literally, quite incredible, as in - Noem: 223 people rescued (22x3=66); Authorities: at least 27 people dead (2+7=9); National Weather Service: flooding causes an average of 125 deaths per year (125 = 12x5=60)
is there a message beneath this messaging, one wonders.
Petra has trained me to get a couple of these numbers but you got more than I did.
I wonder if at the time it happened the same numbers were reported or is someone now having fun with us and Petra?
hiding in plain sight, showoffs that they are.
I think we would have to wait for the (official) final death toll to work anything out, as the numbers keep changing.
27 is 3 cubed, 18 is 3 sixes.
tru dat, thnx
But 27 = 3 x 9, and 9 is equivalent to 6 (when turned upside down), so 27 also represents 3 sixes.
Total rookie question with the numbers: seems many ways to break them down and I get so confused on the numberology of the whole thing and the powers that be that use the numbers...which numbers are most suspect?
They seem to like doubled numbers, like 11, 22, 33, 44 etc. (they're important in esoterica). Notice also these numbers can be disguised, e.g. 33 can be 3x3 (9) or 3+3 (6).
Then there's anything to do with 6. Plus derivates or multiples etc. (e.g. 18 is 3x6).
Essentially, for numerology (also known as 'reducing' numbers usually to get a single digit, although sometimes a double), you basically just separate each digit in a number. Random example: 59386 - 5-9-3-8-6. You can then just play around with them. This is especially important when you consider 'metadata' - i.e. dates and times etc.
Then there's the most basic substitution code, namely a=1, b=2, c=3 etc.
In numerology sometimes one would reduce a number to 2 digits. Then we say it's the second number acting through the first. Each of the first 9 digits has a particular meaning, and also involves a progression. Once you get to 9 you would then go on to 10, which is 1+0=1, so you start again.
Some people, like Miles Mathis, seem to think that 'aces and eights' are important - i.e. 1 or 11, and the number 8. Personally I think that's silly. Although 18 is The Moon in the Tarot, which refers to hidden, dark stuff, which may be revealed by the light of the moon etc. Also refers to the unconscious.
Most of the time, IMO, the numbers don't actually mean anything, it's just the bad guys fucking with people.
Another occult option is you can relate the first 78 numbers to a specific tarot card, as there are 78 in a tarot deck - 22 major arcana, then 56 minor. In this system the Fool, which is usually card zero in the arcana, would be designated 22 (again, you can cycle through them, going back to the beginning after).
Maybe I should do an article about it.
There is also the caveat that we are dealing with the decimal system here, and as such statistically speaking it's eminently possible to get some meaning out of any randomly selected numbers. So it should all be taken with a pinch of salt really.
It seems like people find meaning in literally any number. They'll justify it somehow. I'm not doubting numerology but I'm doubting most interpretations of it. EVERYTHING can't have meaning or else nothing has meaning.
Thank you, my add or adhd leaves me befuddled when all the numbers are thrown out. This helps :-) I'll leave it to the experts to dissect this all but I really appreciate your input...I'm sure you see patterns once you know what to look for :)
Current death toll = 70
Current rescues = 850
The numbers are changing hourly, as head counts across hundreds of miles of the state are gradually compiled.
Yes, I noticed the numbers have gone up a lot. My (French) feed said 59 a few hours ago, so clearly it's increasing.
Yeah. Just like with Hurricane Helene, it takes time to figure out who is accounted for and who is not.
Unless you were physically there? hard, in this digitized "reality" of electronic sight (video) and sound (audio), to ascertain if what supposedly happened...happened. We know that worldwide mass media is hopelessly biased and compromised. So, wise (Sophia) not to hold fast to any particular perspective or concept. Regardless potential obscuration, there exists a Ground of Being and path to spiritual Life that transcends human materiality based on objective personal development, freedom and love.
Most likely solar radiation management, aka geoengineering, aka weather warfare. It is the crown jewel of the military industrial complex. Floods in one area, extreme drought in others. A country, state or city can be under attack by their own gubmint and the folks don't even know it.
They blame climate change and it helps push their green agendas. There are multiple agendas that can be debated. What cannot be debated is the tic tak toe streaking going on over our heads leaving white trails that are explained away as contrails.
The droughts lead to tinder like conditions that are the root cause of the catastrophic wildfires we are seeing. The firefighters will say they've never seen fires like this. They are either uninformed or lying about not knowing the root cause.
All of this leads to crop failures. No food equals no people. Isn't that the bottom line? In the meantime, they profit from disaster capitalism, i.e. $$$ made on other people's misery or loss of life. For more info, geoengineerinwatch.org with Dane Wigington
We will never get the truth. Government and the media have to protect their murdering ways.
Abolish Government and we will get ALL the truths!
Stop viewing Strangers that TELL A VISION....this is a must.
I am at 15+ years with none of that shit in my home and life could not be better.
Has anyone mentioned 'climate emergency' yet?
Of course.
It's heartless distortion of a massive human tragedy, and a geographic reality that has nothing to do with "global warming":
> https://vimeo.com/727446684
This comment, from another Substack article about the floods, very accurately describes just how astonishing these storms really are:
> https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/is-the-july-4th-flood-a-result-of/comment/132687509