Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petra Liverani's avatar

The post has been heavily edited - major edits are:

1. The events indicated by the gallery of photos have been itemised with links.

2. The fake Salman Rushdie knife attack has been added with an extra link to fatwa hoax analysis prompted by commenter, The Researcher. https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/blood-and-bandages-are-they-real/comment/56699467

3. Clarification has been made on the Pallywood information - the tweet referred to was falsely putting forward footage of a genuine film production (but this doesn't discount evidence of actual fakery) and the comment is expanded on.

4. From prompting by commenter, Thibault Erikson, added link to article by Martin Vrijland showing Gazans have been moved out of Gaza according to the Abraham Accords (as well as other articles showing agenda for the theatre in Gaza) https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/blood-and-bandages-are-they-real/comment/56160552

5. From prompting by commenter Ty changes made to caption under headlining photo re Jeff Bauman. https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/blood-and-bandages-are-they-real/comment/55724962

Expand full comment
Evelyn K. Brunswick's avatar

Those are interesting comments about Gaza. And they're also quite revealing I think in terms of the purpose (or one of many purposes) behind the production of fake evidence. With regards to Gaza, it seems somewhat obvious to me that they are creating fake evidence in order to give some people an excuse to say something like 'it's not really happening at all' or 'it's not as bad as we are told' - meaning 'Israel' isn't really as bad as you think it is, as if 'oh it's only 20k dead children instead of 40k' or whatever.

It also pre-empts future war crimes trials because the 'defence' can simply hold up some fake stuff and say 'see, it's fake. It never happened'.

So I think when we are confronted by 'fake stuff' we need to take a step back and rather than immediately concluding 'oh it never happened' (which is true in some cases, sure), we need to ask 'why' - why are they creating fake evidence (including 'crisis actors' and 'images' and 'moulage' etc.).

In particular, what is the 'story' they are trying to tell. All propaganda is about a narrative, and getting people to believe that narrative because the propagandists understand that this is the way people see and interpret the world and, thus, form opinions (and opinions lead to actions and decisions). I'm currently in the process of writing specifically about this, so you've just given me even more food for thought (thank you!)...

Another thing of course is 'learned helplessness' - like Winston Smith having to eventually ask O'Brien how many fingers there are. If one can't trust any source of information, I mean.

Ah - the other thing - I know what you are saying about 'they're all in it together' but there are demonstrably minority groups (in fact, the majority group of humanity itself) which are not a part of that. The people of Gaza are a case in point. It is utterly absurd to believe that the Gazans would be 'in on it' in any conceivable way. In fact, given we are dealing with monstrous psychopaths here, those psychopaths genuinely want to eliminate minority groups.

Once those minority groups are eliminated, they hope to be left with a 'majority humanity group' all of whom 'conform' and think the same way, and are thus utterly controlled.

Yes, they will do fake events. But they will also do genuine extermination. That's what they're like.

I have also noticed how the 'rate of increased death count' in Gaza has decreased dramatically in the mainstream media, and it's also difficult to find out how many people are in fact dead. They got to about 30k pretty quickly, then they must've thought, hold on, if we keep telling the truth then the numbers are going to exceed a threshold beyond which there will be serious pushback. So let's now just let the numbers 'creep' up gradually - despite the fact that now they have no necessities of existence and there is disease and starvation etc. the rate of increase should be much higher. So I would've expected at least 100,000 dead by now.

That's an interesting question with regards to the fakery, perhaps? If the suggestion is the current official figure of, what, approaching 40k, is in fact correct, then it means the earlier numbers were incorrect/or lies, even - see this simply sows even more confusion such that we can no longer trust any source of information - I think this is one of the main purposes of fakery. Learned helplessness, again.

Expand full comment
79 more comments...

No posts