"The moon landings – subtlety so utterly consistent with expectations. Images of the moon landings show minute amounts of dust on the landing pads of the lunar module which can only be seen in high-resolution photos with the magnifying tool and a faint radial exhaust pattern under the lunar module."
They used real full sized or miniature models back then, not CGI. Thus, there could be dust from however the "landing images" of the ridiculously designed module was done. There should have been tons of dust. Even with the Moon's gravity, the exhaust blast should have been terrific.
Plus: The moonscape horizon was ridiculous. The moon isn't THAT small. Plenty of dust for footprints. Obvious "line" between the stage covered with soil / dust and a background painting. Kubrick should have been capable of better.
Even on the moon it would take a lot of power to blast off the surface. Absurd design of the craft made visual inspection impossible.
Petra - NASA says: The Moon is an average of 238,855 miles away from Earth, which is about 30 Earths away. So you believe in miracles & absurdities related to an obviously impossible moon trip/moon landing - 238,855 miles on a set of rocket engines after the initial blast-off - but not on a bogus 9/11?
Both are major deceptions - controlled psyops - and are BOTH easily proven false by simple physics.
You realize that there was no technology available for rocket engines to support extreme round trips of 238,000+ miles don't you? The technology for this round trip thru space vacuum is still non-existent & NASA has admitted this in many videos over the past 10 years. Also NASA says that rockets can't go thru the Van Allen radiation belts without burning up. So distance & conditions rule out the moon trips.
Moreover...
How was it possible for phone calls of 238.000+ miles between the astro-nots & Nixon in Wash DC? Huh? The phone technology way back in 1969 (I grew up then) was very basic & had no call distance possible without ground or ocean telecom cables. No satellites, no wifi/cell towers, so no space calls.
Wondering why you would opt out of understanding that the moon trips are all about the available technology at that time. Of course there are other reasons why the moon trips are impossible but it seems you are denying previous evidence provided & not fully considering the physics questions that rule out any possibility of moon trips. No available technology = no moon trip or moon walk. Simple.
Do you have any answer for how the rocket/ spaceship could possibly turn around & head back to earth without utilizing new rocket payloads or how the space capsule could navigate Van Allen safely?
All the other reasons why we didn't go to the moon are also the final nails in the moon coffin story.
Have you watched this? It's comprehensive & conclusive to me.
> AMERICAN MOON - A Documentary Exposing NASA, The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax, The Space Race And More! (2017)
"The most comprehensive documentary on the moon landing hoax" by Massimo Mazzucco
First published at 04:20 UTC on February 13th, 2022.
Summary description at another mirrored post of documentary: A massive amount of really strong evidence shows that everything we saw has been made in studios. In the last minutes of the 3.5 hours film we see Neil Armstrong, "Buzz" Aldrin en Michael Collins at the press conference and some other places. Heavily timid faces. I mean, this is not evidence, but at the end of this documentary there is no need for that. Those who are a bit sensitive for the facial expression of people will see a few good man who shun as many questions as possible and are ashamed of the spectacle in which they are the heroes. They [astronauts] didn't even attend the most important commemorations in the years following their first steps on the moon. - 3 years, 7 months ago
"The moon landings – subtlety so utterly consistent with expectations. Images of the moon landings show minute amounts of dust on the landing pads of the lunar module which can only be seen in high-resolution photos with the magnifying tool and a faint radial exhaust pattern under the lunar module."
They used real full sized or miniature models back then, not CGI. Thus, there could be dust from however the "landing images" of the ridiculously designed module was done. There should have been tons of dust. Even with the Moon's gravity, the exhaust blast should have been terrific.
Plus: The moonscape horizon was ridiculous. The moon isn't THAT small. Plenty of dust for footprints. Obvious "line" between the stage covered with soil / dust and a background painting. Kubrick should have been capable of better.
Even on the moon it would take a lot of power to blast off the surface. Absurd design of the craft made visual inspection impossible.
ISS and space walks fake too.
Petra - NASA says: The Moon is an average of 238,855 miles away from Earth, which is about 30 Earths away. So you believe in miracles & absurdities related to an obviously impossible moon trip/moon landing - 238,855 miles on a set of rocket engines after the initial blast-off - but not on a bogus 9/11?
Both are major deceptions - controlled psyops - and are BOTH easily proven false by simple physics.
You realize that there was no technology available for rocket engines to support extreme round trips of 238,000+ miles don't you? The technology for this round trip thru space vacuum is still non-existent & NASA has admitted this in many videos over the past 10 years. Also NASA says that rockets can't go thru the Van Allen radiation belts without burning up. So distance & conditions rule out the moon trips.
Moreover...
How was it possible for phone calls of 238.000+ miles between the astro-nots & Nixon in Wash DC? Huh? The phone technology way back in 1969 (I grew up then) was very basic & had no call distance possible without ground or ocean telecom cables. No satellites, no wifi/cell towers, so no space calls.
Wondering why you would opt out of understanding that the moon trips are all about the available technology at that time. Of course there are other reasons why the moon trips are impossible but it seems you are denying previous evidence provided & not fully considering the physics questions that rule out any possibility of moon trips. No available technology = no moon trip or moon walk. Simple.
Do you have any answer for how the rocket/ spaceship could possibly turn around & head back to earth without utilizing new rocket payloads or how the space capsule could navigate Van Allen safely?
All the other reasons why we didn't go to the moon are also the final nails in the moon coffin story.
Have you watched this? It's comprehensive & conclusive to me.
> AMERICAN MOON - A Documentary Exposing NASA, The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax, The Space Race And More! (2017)
"The most comprehensive documentary on the moon landing hoax" by Massimo Mazzucco
https://www.bitchute.com/video/35KNMehaxiSg/
Jim Crenshaw
First published at 04:20 UTC on February 13th, 2022.
Summary description at another mirrored post of documentary: A massive amount of really strong evidence shows that everything we saw has been made in studios. In the last minutes of the 3.5 hours film we see Neil Armstrong, "Buzz" Aldrin en Michael Collins at the press conference and some other places. Heavily timid faces. I mean, this is not evidence, but at the end of this documentary there is no need for that. Those who are a bit sensitive for the facial expression of people will see a few good man who shun as many questions as possible and are ashamed of the spectacle in which they are the heroes. They [astronauts] didn't even attend the most important commemorations in the years following their first steps on the moon. - 3 years, 7 months ago