Guadelupe River and 9/11: commonalities

A few days ago, I went to social media (FB) to see what I could get directly from people affected, hoping to get something I could trust, however, this image - an obvious fake (note truck sign Texas Plumbing & Backflow) - was in the first post that popped up. Why would the algorithm return this fake image first when there are so many real images of destruction?

Evacuated areas of destruction

When we see massive physical effects of destruction in locations normally occupied by people, it is difficult to imagine that people aren’t killed and injured, however, if great effort is made to fully evacuate those areas prior to destruction then death and injury can be kept to a minimum if not avoided completely.

Great effort to fully evacuate areas prior to an event implies, of course, serious planning.

9/11 - what is standard protocol when buildings are destroyed?

Even among those who don’t believe the nonsense terrorist story presented to us for 9/11, there are many who find it difficult to comprehend that death and injury were kept to a minimum (if not completely avoided) due to full evacuations prior, however, logically if the terrorist story is not accepted, the alternative can only be that the buildings in the WTC were destroyed by a controlled means. This being the case the following facts are irrefutable:

• The standard protocol for controlled destructions of buildings is to fully evacuate them and the surrounding areas prior and there is no evidence that says this protocol couldn’t have been followed on 9/11.

• There is abundant evidence that none of the alleged four passenger airliners crashed and there is nothing to say that whatever was done to fake the alleged 264 plane passenger deaths could not also have been done for the alleged dead in the buildings.

• There were obviously hundreds of people - many of whom needed to be in the know - involved in 9/11 and it is difficult to imagine how these people could have been persuaded to participate in a terror story involving real death and injury when - apart from any other reason - their reality is not in the least required for people to believe them. This is in complete contrast to the covid scam whose propaganda campaign was enabled by over a century of medical and scientific fraud.

• There is ample evidence that death and injury were faked.

See 9/11, various

Guadelupe River flood - if there’s sufficient warning …

I’m not going to make the same claims for the Guadelupe River flood as I make for 9/11 because at this stage I have no strong sense of how much is real and how much is fake. Moreover, while people may be faking rescue, the obvious destruction to people’s houses and belongings is a horrible thing for them to experience and if the fakery helps to raise money for them it’s more difficult to argue against it than the events of 9/11, but fakery is my thing so I’m going to point it out.

What makes perfect sense if a disaster is predicted in enough time to allow a full evacuation (as much as possible) is for the authorities to use the event as a “live” exercise and stage rescues and media interviews.

“First day on the job”, a psyop motif

9/11 - heroic first-day-on-the-job grounder of planes

Thanks to Jane Cena for this nugget in the comments. Emphasis added.

Man Who Grounded 4,000 Planes On 9/11 Was On First Day Of His Job

As terrorists seized control of four airplanes on Sept. 11th, 2001, Ben Sliney, chief of air-traffic-control operations at the FAA's command center in Herndon, Va., gave the unprecedented order to ground 4,000-plus planes across the nation and redirect any in the sky to the nearest airport. It was his first day on the job.

But due to Ben Sliney, the Federal Aviation Administration's National Operations Manager on duty that fateful morning, possible harm, at least by the thinking at the time, was averted. Sliney made the gutsy — and completely unprecedented — call to ground every single commercial airplane in the country.

What makes the call — which, without direct order from the President and the bureaucracy above him, was his and his alone to make — all the more gutsy is that Sept. 11th, 2001, was Ben Sliney's first day on the job as an FAA National Operations Manager.

Although that's not to say Sliney was some neophyte making a cowboy-like call. He had 25 years of experience in air traffic control as part of FAA management, including a leadership position at New York TRACON, which has responsibility over all air traffic for New York City's three major airports and the smaller, regional airports in the New York City area. But the decision to ground the planes — that was entirely Sliney's.

In fact, it's such a great story that when Universal Pictures decided to turn the heroism of the passengers of United Flight 93 into a movie, they not only didn't overlook Sliney's role — they asked him to play himself in the movie. Which he did.

Sliney's decision is a great testament to the belief that doing the right thing sometimes requires a risky choice. Sliney made the right one.

Guadelupe River flood - hero rescues 165 girls on first rescue mission

From Miles Mathis’ article (italicised emphasis added)

Which makes this part of the current story even more suspicious: one of the 27 who allegedly died at Mystic wasn't a camp girl, it was this same Dick Eastland himself, age 70. He allegedly drowned trying to save the girls. Not really believable since in a separate story we are told the National Guard and Coast Guard were there with helicopters, saving upwards of 250 girls. So there was no reason for a fat 70-year-old guy to be swimming around trying to rescue able-bodied girls. Was he an ex-Olympic swimmer? Nope.

Since Kerrville and Hunt aren't on the coast, it doesn't make much sense to me that the Coast Guard would lead the rescue here. And since the National Weather Service allegedly didn't issue a flood warning, and the flood started about 4am, who called in the National Guard in the middle of the night? With 750 girls allegedly there and a flood surge of 26 feet in 52 minutes, we should have seen the entire camp annihilated, with a death toll far above 27. The north of two camps was fully in the flood plain, being just feet from the river, and half the girls were allegedly sleeping there. It only takes about two minutes to drown, so the story is not making any sense.

At that last link to the Daily Mail, they are selling you Coast Guard hero Scott Ruskan, 26, who allegedly saved 165 girls all by himself. Really? Their reporter Germania Poleo (fake name alert) calls him Scott Ruskan and Scott Raskan on the same page. Great reporting, AI. This just happened to be his first ever rescue mission. What are the odds, eh? First day on the job and he saves 165 people and gets his name splashed all over the world.

I guess he will be running for Congress next. The Coast Guard sure has some good photographers, hunh? That looks right out of Hollywood. Strange they couldn't get his full name on his pack. Also strange that he needs two helmets. I see only one head.

Upon arrival, Ruskan became the sole coordinator on site, directing the entire rescue operation and coordinating triage under extreme conditions.

OK, let me see if I have this straight: a 26-year-old guy on his first mission became the sole coordinator of this entire rescue operation? And why exactly would this kid be coordinating triage? Is he also a doctor? No, he is a petty officer and rescue swimmer, so he shouldn't have been coordinating triage.

They also admit in that article that it took his team six hours to fly in from Corpus Christi, due to bad weather. Which was way too late to save anyone from drowning, as we have already established. It is 200 miles from Corpus Christi to Hunt, so it makes no sense to call in rescue from there. San Antonio is only about 75 miles away, and it is stiff with military bases. Ft. Hood is also twice as close as Corpus Christi. So calling in rescue from the coast because they needed a swimmer is just a joke. No one in San Antonio or Austin or Ft. Hood can swim?

Let's say you are drowning on Manhattan Beach, hit by a surfboard or something. How much time do the lifeguards have before you are dead? You have seen Baywatch: it's about three minutes, isn't it? So are they going to call in rescue teams from 200 miles away, in Las Vegas? No, Hasselhoff is going to be in the water immediately, isn't he?

So the idea this Ruskan dude flew in six hours after high tide and saved 165 people from drowning is for people on ventilators.

Two other nonsensical Guadelupe River rescue stories

The following are two rescues stories that bear - as do the stories above - the highly distinctive hallmark of a psyop: Revelation of the Method - in a nutshell, the psyop rule of deliberate nonsense.

‘Angel on this earth’: Family reunites with hero who saved them from Texas floods

In this interview the reporter asks the “angel”, Matthew, “What prompted you to go and check in on that family?”

Matthew: “It was a gut feeling. I had intended on leaving and going home and enjoying the rest of my day ...”

Reporter to mom, Chrissie: “What went through your head when you heard a stranger screaming at your home in the middle of the night?”

Serious anomaly: if it was the middle of the night how could Matthew have been thinking about enjoying the rest of his day? Also, in the middle of the night there were signs of rain and flooding and there had been warnings so the scenario of a “stranger screaming at one's home” doesn't really fit.

The route of escape makes little sense: over the chainlink fence to their pickup truck and then from the pickup truck to their neighbour's yard.

The reporter then asks about Chrissie's daughter slipping and says, "I think her name's Dove". Chrissie replies with what sounds like, "Maiyan, my daughter ... nearly went down the river with my car. Her brother Dove (pronounced Dohve) ... "

Seriously, she has a son called Dove pronounced Dohve.

Hero dad left goodbye voicemails to kids before dying in Texas floods

This interview and testimony make little sense. Emphasis added.

Reporter: “As the floodwaters started to overtake his camper at an RV park in Kerrville, Jeff Ramsey spent the final moments of his life calling his family to warn them about the impending floods. His son, Jake Ramsey, says that warning from his dad is what gave him enough courage to escape and save himself.”

…

Reporter: “His voicemail's also what helped you save other members of your family.”

Jake: “It's actually a bit twisted, the story - that is - cos it wasn't me. I've been up here watching my sister. It was his stepmother - his, uh, my stepmother, her brother and her mom that were up there. They were in a cabin about 100 yards up and my dad made the call to them early in the morning, just seeing if there was anything they could do to help and at that point it was too late but he did save one last life on top of the many that he saved throughout his long life so it was a great way for him to go out. My stepmom's brother has been nothing but helpful. He searched for dad, he searched for Tanya, he was just down there helping any way he can, and he just got back up and brought the dog back to us, we're just happy to have Chloe with us here.

Reporter: “So it was your stepmom's son that you got the message to. He was inspired to get out there and ... he's the one that saved Chloe, the family dog.

Jake: So Chloe was just found. She was washed up about half-way between the point where my stepmom's phone ended up. We were able to recover that. About half-way between Ingram and Kerrville is where they picked up Chloe and she's just such a huge part of my dad and Tanya's heart so to have her back here with us, it means the world to us. She's still a puppy, she's like one and a half, we're going to get to have her for hopefully the next decade and pour our love into her that my dad would have poured into her otherwise.

Questions and comments:

1. The reporter says it was Jake’s father’s warning that gave him the courage to escape and save himself but what about his sister who he “was watching”? She’s not reported as dead and why no mention of the fate of Jake’s stepmom’s brother and mother? Why did neither Jake nor his sister answer their phones?

2. Jake’s demeanour does not suggest someone who’s only just lost his father and stepmother.

3. Having Jake tell us, “It’s … a bit twisted, the story - that is,” is a typical Revelation of the Method clue and, in fact, the story is difficult to make sense of and contains illogicalities, for example, the reporter says to Jake, “So it was your stepmom’s son … ” when no mention of her son has been made at this point.

4. Why would Jake be “watching his sister” when we are told she is an adult with no mention of anything about her that would require her to be watched and we are given no sense of the reason that Jake and his sister were able to survive while his father and stepmom were not?

5. Why was Jake’s stepmother with her brother and mother instead of with Jake’s father?

6. We’re told that Jake’s father rang his wife and her brother and mother to warn them of the impending flood so why does Jake say that his father rang them, “just seeing if there was anything they could do to help”? Wasn’t the warning so they could help themselves to escape the flood?

7. How did Jake’s father know about the impending flood but his wife and her brother and mother 100 yards away didn’t?

8. There is no clear indication that Jake’s father saved anyone’s life in the flood (nor that he’d supposedly saved many before) and how credible is it that a son would say of his just lost father if he did just save someone’s life on top of many, “It was a great way for him to go out.”

9. Isn’t it odd to speak of being “able to recover” someone’s mobile phone when they’ve just died?

In general, my research shows no clear evidence of genuine rescue although I wouldn’t argue it didn’t happen, of course.

Any other anomalies or clear evidence of rescue from readers welcome.

Camp Mystic … the plot thickens

Read Kitten’s article below to learn interesting information about the families whose children attend Camp Mystic and the financial problems within the family who owns the camp.

Mystic mafia

Miles Mathis - more on Camp Mystic and other anomalies

https://mileswmathis.com/flood.pdf

Mikki Willis, Johnny on the spot - 9/11, Guadelupe River and the pandemic

• Mikki was there on 9/11 handing first responders sandwiches

• Mikki was one of the makers of the second-tier propaganda film, Plandemic

• Mikki (with his wife next to him) was there to promote the both heart-breaking and heartwarming story of Malaya Grace who showed great bravery during the Guadelupe flood but sadly died.

Was this flood merely anticipated or made to happen?

Opinions and any information welcome.

Post from Deep Dive showing that the probability that the 26-foot rise in 45 minutes in the Guadalupe River was a natural occurrence rather than due to something like covert weather manipulation was between 7 and 8 chances in a million.

We might ask the question though: was there a 26-foot rise in 45 minutes or is this propaganda to support the notion of inability to evacuate? I must say, however, that whatever the rise rate was it’s hard for me to believe that this flood happened by mere coincidence on Independence Day.

Chance the central Texas flood is natural