156 Comments

Hi Petra! I might have already asked you this in the past. If I did, please forgive me. I have no memory left whatsoever. It's not about this specific event, but about the same type of thing.

Are you familiar with Rosario Marcianò? He posts only in Italian and most of his excellent work is about geo-engineering. Anyway, he's about to go to jail in Italy, literally, because of his work on the Bataclan event. He's shown lots of proof of what it was, but the Italian government blew its top when he used Google to show a 98% match in the photos of the "victim", Valeria Solesin, before the event and wide awake and alive, after she was "dead." The Italian government felt it needed to 'teach Sig. Marcianò a lesson' about exposing them, so they're sending him to jail, without even allowing the two year "conditional" that's given to every convicted person, for supposedly harassing the Solesin family, by publishing the truth and the photo.

Manchester was just like the Bataclan, in that we know EXACTLY what they were. Psyops that pushed forward an agenda or two, or four, etc.

As for Richard Hall, on a purely personal note, I haven't trusted the guy since I first ran across him, shilling for the Maddie McCann hoax. That one was so beautifully outed by Peter James Cullen, that Richard Hall looked like an absolute amateur and obvious controlled opposition, once Cullen's work was published.

Anyway, this article is GREAT!! Really, really, well done and I'll obviously share it. Again, I sincerely apologize if I've already talked about Marcianò. All of the geo-engineering and other chemicals have done their intended job on my brain, unfortunately.

Thanks very much!!! 🙂

Expand full comment

OK, so already I smell a very, very big rat, Opinionist. It seems RM published an article saying that AI supported his theory that she was still alive. This suggests that whatever imagery he used does not clearly show that Valeria is still alive. With the Challenger disaster people we do not need AI, it's as clear as day. This simply reminds me of RDH and the Roussos parents. If the imagery is not clear then what we have is speculation and when you have clear evidence of things such as in psyops always done RoM-style going into murky territory like that is a very bad move.

https://sejul.ai/en/article/dbd95e10-784c-5317-85ce-437aa06ba34b

Expand full comment

Hi Petra! Sorry for my late reply! I'd stake plenty on Rosario Marcianò being the real deal, but because I've had a long time to vet him. I'm super, super, worried about controlled opposition myself and it takes me a really long time before I trust someone, so I completely understand your concerns. I should've explained that he wasn't basing his Valeria Solesin info on the photo only. Frankly, I don't know what kind of experience he has with photos, but I think this was more of a sort of thing that was done a bit sarcastically, as if to say "and look, even their own AI propaganda machine agrees with me!" That's the way I took it at least. I tend to run away from people who do photo comparisons and things like that. In fact, he's never done anything like this and his attitude while doing it told me that it was more of a sort of kick at Google than it was a serious thing. Just to let you know, he has a YT channel under his name and a website called tankerenemy.com that's in Italian. Like I said, the great majority of his work has been on geo-engineering, but he also did good reporting on the Genoa bridge collapse and ONLY on the Solesin part of Bataclan.

Years ago, he and his brother and a very small, secret, group of people had arranged to get a pilot to obtain samples of the geo engineering material that comes from the planes. One of the people who knew about the pilot test was Massimo Mazzucco, the controlled opposition guy who made the film about 9/11. Mazzucco decided to publicly out the experiment and the group, which cost them years of work and the money they'd already spent. Marcianò has an excellent reputation in Italy.

If I sound like I'm 'pushing' the guy, it's because I completely trust him and have watched and read him for years. He's a very quiet, older man and doesn't do anything flashy or that seeks attention. This isn't one of those fake Alex Jones and Sandy Hook situations, in which the whole lawsuit is a fraud, etc. The guy has really been sentenced to a year in jail and I've got to admit that I don't remember whether it's legally related to anything he's published about Valeria Solesin, or whether it's about another supposed crime, but based on his outing of her being alive.

I just want to be sure that you understand that I always have the same types of concerns that you do ; that people aren't what they claim to be and are really working against the truth. That's why I REALLY hope you'll check out Marcianò's website and YT channel. Seeing him on YT gives a feel for his intelligence and seriousness.

Also, I really appreciate this link and I'll look at it right now. I don't know why on earth I didn't do that before I responded! OH!!! Before I go and forget to tell you - my eldest daughter is right in the middle of a psyop right now!!! The story of "Lakin Riley" in Athens, Georgia. (Lakin's "body" was found IN A LAKE! 😂

Anyway, my kid works for the office that's defending the supposed perp. I couldn't believe it when I found out that my own child is right in the middle of a psyop and didn't even know it!! At first, she refused to listen to even the possibility that it wasn't real, but then she started to ask questions and wanted to understand every detail about how these things are done. She's now "thinking about it", as of Sunday, so I sure hope I did a halfway decent job of explaining this stuff to her! 🤞 I'm keeping my fingers crossed!

Sorry again for writing so much and for taking so long to respond to you!! Please do thoroughly check out R. Marcianò when you have the time. I guarantee you that I wouldn't publicly humiliate myself by speaking positively about someone I hadn't vetted.

Thanks very much again!! Until next time!! 🙂🙋🏻‍♀️ ✨

Expand full comment

Thanks, Jennifer. OK, I was hasty to judge but I couldn't really find anything else, however, Thibault has provided some useful links. Looking at the articles on his website I can see he's simply said that the person who's said to be someone else leaving the Bataclan in a wheelchair is really Valeria and then to bolster his claim called on AI. These people do not pull their punches - putting a person who allegedly died at the event in a wheelchair and giving them a different name ... but then when you call them out for it, they don't like it.

So I looked a little more at the fact-check page. Love this:

"The AI analysis, despite claiming a high degree of similarity (95-98%), couldn't definitively confirm the identity of the individuals in the images."

That's so incredible about your daughter being innocently involved in a psyop. Yeah, I saw that event and thought it was a psyop - didn't notice the Laken in a Lake though!

Expand full comment

Hi! Yes, the whole Marcianò thing is really a long string of things put together and it's my fault for not saying that at the beginning. The Italian government is just using the Solesin story to come after him on his geo-engineering work.

My daughter being in the middle of that psyop was absolutely incredible!! We'd made a pact to stay away from talking about subjects like psyops, “climate change”, which she's bought the entire story about, etc. This time I couldn't keep my mouth shut because she was emotionally torn up about this “poor girl who died such a horrible death “ and whose ‘killer’ was being defended by her bosses. She'd even interviewed this supposed killer twice, to see if he qualified for some kind of help from the State of Georgia!! Anyway, it took me more than a week of writing, plus two long phone conversations and screenshots from a Miles Mathis post, to even get her to consider the fact that she was in the middle of a psyop. It's been a real experience for me, as I'm sure you can imagine!! We see so many of these things, but we never get physically close to them, or know anyone who does. What a trip!!

I saw the PoM post about you, with the attached video and was really happy about it. I'm looking forward to listening to the podcast that's included in the article, as soon as my headphones are finished charging. Thanks for being so patient with my super long messages!!! I really appreciate it and I really appreciate your work too!! See you next time!! Ciao! 🙂🙋🏻‍♀️💫

Expand full comment

Hi Jennifer, So sorry. I meant to reply to your comment ages ago and it's only now with the argy-bargy going on between you and Researcher that I was reminded. What I find interesting with Researcher is that he rubbished me for four years on OffG for my claims that death and injury were staged on 9/11 and then when I returned to take a look at OffG after having stopped posting there because of the comment censorship (so completely at odds with the OffG ethos) and the fact that I could simply get no traction for that complete no-brainer I saw that Researcher had completely changed his tune. I'm like, "Did I get the name wrong, is this the person I think it is?" Now Researcher does not believe in the reality of anything at all - I think he's gone too far the other way but he claims he's seen Masonic hand signs from Marciano - I've just asked for evidence so if he has it that will be interesting.

Like Thibault I do think that Valeria Solesin does look like the same person so I'm not sure why you don't ... but perhaps that's not so important, however, I find Masonic hand signs a bit of a dealbreaker. I mean, the OK sign where where thumb and forefinger touch are used widely so I wouldn't take that sign on its own to mean anything ... anyway I'll see what Mr R comes back with.

I must say from viewing some of his video he looks like a deadly serious person and gives no vibe whatsoever of CO but perhaps some CO is simply more discreet than others.

What's happening with your daughter is truly amazing. I know people who know people or have even been friends with people who allegedly died in events in Australia which to me look completely staged but I think actually being involved in a psyop case is truly fascinating.

You're the only person I know apart from myself calling out Mazzucco as controlled opposition and I find that reassuring. I mean, I didn't really doubt it but it's good to see someone else recognises it.

Expand full comment

Hello Opinionist, I went to Rosario Marcianò's blog. If you google Valeria Solesin, you'll quickly come across this article:

https://www.leggo.it/italia/cronache/parigi_bataclan_valeria_solesin_processo_complottisti_cosa_sappiamo_oggi_13_11_2024-8473735.html?refresh_ce

Then in the blog's search bar:

https://www.tankerenemy.com/search?q=valeria+solesin

He was convicted for just two articles? Or have articles been deleted from his blog or elsewhere?

In comparison, my French blog used to show up on the first page when you searched for “Ginnie Watson” but over time my blog was dereferenced (voluntarily I'm sure).

Honestly, I was prepared for problems when I published this article, especially since I was planning to share it a little. But no doubt because of the very low number of views on my blog (the article didn't exceed 10,000 views), I haven't had anything for 6 years.

https://canularisme.wordpress.com/2018/10/28/ginnie-watson-actrice-de-metier-et-survivante-du-bataclan-ou-pas/

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for the links, Thibault. I see lots of people call out Ginnie Watson in the ABC-published video - it's incredible how the videos directly from the media have so many comments from people recognising the fakery. There's one of Robbie Parker published by CNN and 97% of the comments call him out with so very, very few of the "How dare you, people died!" responses you normally get.

Expand full comment

I would have loved to see the period comments for Emma Parkinson gleefully recounting her shot fire on butt. I'd tracked down the official website but the commentaries weren't available...

https://crowdbunker.com/v/VFcpDN6oWG

And also this couple who were on a major French TV channel only a week later:

https://crowdbunker.com/v/rgx6qFZUDH

These three people were still there during the shooting, unlike Ginnie Watson.

Which may have been true. Blank shots. Now I like to think that there were 1500 real spectators right up to the start of the staging. Possibly with some people falling over falsely in front of others.

A mixture of the real and the fake, reinforcing the illusion for non-complicit witnesses, as “Lez Luthor” (Illusion Warfare) often explains on his youtube channel.

"But you poor fool, I was there, you scumbag, you conspiracy theorist moron, and what's more, I knew this person, where is she now, eh, are you going to tell me ?"

My own older brother had thought of going that day to the Bataclan and he knows someone who knew someone. And we can assume it's plausible, except that...

I remember at the end of 2018, an alleged attack in the Christmas market of Strasbourg (great french city), my sister-in-law who seemed to express doubts. My mother adding "but did people really die?"

And I sighed in my head "what's the point to response and try to explain in 5 minutes?"

I also like this guy just 4 days after the alleged loss of his wife:

https://crowdbunker.com/v/FB43MTY3Et

And by the way, they released a series in France last month about an (alleged) real fake victim:

https://vl-media.fr/qui-etait-florence-la-vraie-mythomane-du-bataclan-qui-a-inspire-la-serie-une-amie-devouee/

You know even for Robbie Parker, a conspiracy theorist with a good following in France for whom the attacks are blood sacrifices. Well, for one thing, he assumed that the Alex Jones trial was real and that people didn't believe it precisely because Robbie Parker was laughing (for me, it's especially the fact that he suddenly changes his behavior before speaking, as if he were returning to the role of the father who lost his daughter).But he seemed to find an explanation for this behavior. But putting off the reality of the event, no.

And he's not an agent, I can certify that he's sincere, just to show once again the impossibility of wanting to understand for the “truthers”.

Expand full comment

Hi again! The article I sent you has a video embedded in it. I just went to look again and the part about Solesin, Bataclan, and what Marcianò has been put through, begins at minute 24:07. I also just found out that part of his sentence is to pay €80,000 euro to the family of Solesin. I've got to say it again - this is definitely NOT one of those fake Alex Jones /Sandy Hook farces. I'd have fallen for that in 2013, but not with the experience I've gained over all these years. Ciao! 🌞🙂🌞🙂🌞🙂

Expand full comment

Thank you for your initial response. I look forward to hearing more and take all the time you need.

Without dwelling too much on his blog and his youtube channel (it's a pity It doesn't have automatic subtitles as I don't speak a word of Italian), I had a rather favorable opinion but with a fundamental doubt.

Are you of Italian origin yourself? Do you know of any Italian sites/blogs that are in the same type of search as Petra, my blog etc ?

I've searched in the past and with different vpn to locate me in Germany, Spain etc, I haven't found much.

Anyway, when I see that my own blog isn't as easy to find as it used to be. Besides, I was far from having only French-speaking visitors.

Expand full comment

Hi! I sent your article to my best friend to translate for me. She lives in Quebec, so she speaks Canadian French, plus her husband is a technical translator by profession, so one or the other will do a great job. They're both truth people, so they're looking forward to reading it themselves!

As for me, no I'm not Italian. I'm American, of British heritage, but I've lived in Milano for 28 years and other times before that. It's because I married three Italian men, but the first one and the last one both died, so it's not like I just go around marrying guys right and left. 😂

There were a BUNCH of people who had started blogs and YouTube channels here, but they started them during “Covid” and the minute that farce was over, they all quit. I haven't been able to find anyone at all here, who talks about the kinds of subjects we're interested in. Nothing about Agenda 2030, nothing about replacement immigration, nothing about chemicals or vaccines or Big Pharma, or the food supply, or anything about anything!!! The ironic thing is that there are a couple of big controlled opposition tv and radio shows and podcasts too, but they seem to be trying to debunk facts that come to Italy from other countries, rather than from inside of Italy. I'll make you a serious promise though - if I do have someone here reccomended to me, the person posts in English, and it turns out to be someone trustworthy, I'll be more than happy to let you know. I've always got my eyes and ears on the job, searching for info here, but from someone who posts in English!! They aren't easy to find anymore. I read and write in Italian, but much prefer English.

Sorry for writing so much!! I'm also sorry again for my late reply to you! I'll let you know when I've received the translation of your article. Thanks again for sending it!! Bye for now!!

🙂🌞🙂🌞🙂🌞🙂

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 29
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Wow that's interesting. Rosario's name sounds vaguely familiar but my memory's not so great either so if you have mentioned him to me I've forgotten.

That's a worry if he's genuine, a very big worry. It's ironic. In my recent podcast with Brendan Murphy he asked about how all the alleged dead people simply disappear and my response was that they probably do something like a Witness Protection Program but not where they exercise the same concern about keeping the person hidden because what are you going to do about it if you find a person still alive, call the police? And, of course, the Challenger disaster people are still walking around with the same or similar names. I guess publicising the still-aliveness of crisis actors now is more of a problem for them though because things are very different from when the Challenger disaster was staged. People generally are waking up more ... because they're simply bombarding us with these things. Will take a look but, of course, I will still have to apply my "controlled opposition" lens. Is this just another kind of elaborate setup?

Expand full comment

Marcianò’s a Freemason and total shill. Are you delusional? It couldn’t be more obvious it’s all fake.

Expand full comment

This reminds me of early YT days when a conspiracy pundit would say something like;

''yeah I was told by someone about to retire, who'd worked for for over 30 years in (mentions a specific department of security,banking etc) but I've got to keep their identity secret.''

&

'' Only 3 people had access, & my inside source has to remain anonymous because they have distinctive features & only one arm''.

Here we appear to be getting some expose from Onionfest, yet it is riddled with discrepancies of tact, fact & probability.

I wonder is it another RUSE to devalue & ridicule valid information (Chemtrail strategies that do exist) with more crummy controlled ops outlets, that are now such an epidemic online?

Expand full comment

Good points!

As soon as I see Freemasonic hand signs and cartel signals from over exposed controlled opp actors, feigning persecution or prosecution, I’m out.

Re, geoengineering, the patents have been around since the 1930’s (a century), the military admits to weather warfare, spraying with chemicals, biologics, cloud seeding and irradiating the atmosphere, so it’s no secret.

The Intel agencies appear to want us to know as it’s openly discussed on every DoD platform Insta/YT/FB/X/BC.

Expand full comment

Are you saying you see Freemasonic hand signs from Marciano?

Expand full comment

Yes! 100%

Expand full comment

Can you point to imagery where you see them?

Expand full comment

This is would be hilarious if it weren't so sickening. You must think you're talking to someone who just woke up yesterday. Either that or you're a fan of cont opp like Italian Massimo Mazzucco or one of the hundreds of American cont opp or limited hangouts or whatever, in existence. Marcianò a Mason?? Next you'll tell me he's a Jesuit too! The years of exposing geo-engineering a "fake"?? Try this with someone else, not with me. Un.be.lievable.

Expand full comment

... and sincere thanks for reminding me why I quit opening Substack over a year ago and why that decision was the right one to begin with.

By the way, rhetorically speaking of course, why didn't you write to me in Italian, without using a translation app, since you know ‘so much’ about what's going on here? No doubt you've read all of Marcianò’s articles on geo engineering in Italian and watched all of his videos about geo engineering in Italian, right? Baby twoofer, if ever there was one. Next thing we know, you'll be reccomending James Corbett for some super duper secret information! 😂 Jesus, what a loser.

Expand full comment

Has the RAM and CIA ur Italian friend... btw ur still using the same pic for at least 10 years now :) I know u from the better YT days.. edit...and he also has the ANO in spanish for ASS!

Expand full comment

...... Overt covert idiot?.....

''Please don't laugh (😂), but if you want to see whether I'm a real person or not and what I look like, I still have my VERY, VERY, OLD Facebook account in existence. My name is Jennifer Maxwell and I live in Milano. My photo, plus this avatar of my late husband, are both on my page. I've never been accused of being an operation before, so now I'm super worried about proving who I am. Crazy, I know!!''

....... & then, bugle call......

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jennifersmaxwell/

https://substack.com/@opinionist/note/c-80734664

https://rocketreach.co/jsm-casting-profile_b5d67ef6f42e3240

Expand full comment

Had to be MILANO ofc.It has the LIA(r) and the ANO (for ass in spanish) just like LIVERANI has the LIE and the ANI :P They love thier gay references

Expand full comment

that is funny & sort of expected, thank you for enriching my view on this

!

Expand full comment

100% agree re Richard Hall

Expand full comment

Why would Richard want to ruin his reputation on purpose?

I know that he and Miri disagree on other things too, With Madelaine McCann I think Richard is right. I have seen him a few times and have never doubted his quest to get to the truth.

Expand full comment

Because Richard D Hall is an intelligence plant, controlled opposition. He's there to muddy the waters and cause anyone who challenges the official narrative to be discredited. (Edited for clearer meaning).

Expand full comment

Controlled opposition agents aim to make themselves seem as though they're genuine truthseekers, Barbara, that's their job ... and they're pretty good at it but when you've studied 9/11 for 10 years you get to see how these people operate and I find it's a case that I judge people to be controlled opposition until proven otherwise ... it's a bit unfair but these people are simply everywhere. Actually, when covid came along I was surprised that there were quite a number of genuine people ... although still loads of controlled opposition.

Come on, as an analyst of Manchester why on earth would someone speculate about whether two crisis actor parents were hiding that their daughter was already dead when we cannot possibly know if she really had died from the information available (to my mind the information available actually suggests she's still alive) and it's simply not important in the scheme of things. Similarly, why would you surveil a teenage girl to see if she's faking injuries. If she is, she's only doing it because of her parents and the orchestrators of the event. It makes no sense for a serious analyst to do that.

Expand full comment

Assume you have considered Iain Davis great account of the recent RDH trial itself for telltale indications? You raise some excellent points about his focus down in the weeds, speculating on niff-naff and appearing to seek to avoid troubling the higher ups. I'm on the fence.

I know the same criticism wouldn't be levelled at myself in approach to blowing the Nicola Bulley hoax clean out of the water (pardoning the pun). FOIs galore and getting right under the skin of all the right people.

Expand full comment

I watched Miri's chat with Iain but haven't really looked at what he's said outside it because I could see he was onboard with RDH and I just thought it will annoy me to follow it. In fact, it was his chat with Miri that prompted my post. He kept talking about "investigative journalism" and I'm like, "you don't NEED investigative journalism per se, psyops are not really investigative journalism territory. You don't need to spy on children who have been roped into these events, especially when they might be suffering genuine injuries from another cause anyway and you definitely shouldn't speculate about whether a child was already dead prior to the event when you have no conclusive information and there's so much very tangible evidence out there."

I don't know whether I'm just missing mention of Nicola Bulley in Australia but I'd never heard of her till I saw her mentioned in Miri's substack and I haven't looked at her case. So you have submitted FOIs? That's great. I shall check out your substack.

Expand full comment

The last couple of posts go straight to the meat of exactly how the live event of pretending to find a body in the river was staged. The first hour and set up. I suggest it's a good example of how media conglomerates bring staged events to life in the imagination of the public. In this particular case Sky News & BBC worked together to fool most people.

Expand full comment

Maybe I hallucinate over my tea & toast?

''psyops are not really investigative journalism territory'' claims confused Petra who is too cowardly to debate me.

What a relief I now see, with brain like that any debate would be like having surgery to shit.

Expand full comment

''Proctocolectomy'' is the word that is used for having surgery to shit.

I hope that helps your cultural studies & sociological awareness when dealing with poseurs on sub-stack?! 😂

Expand full comment

''blowing the Nicola Bulley hoax clean out of the water'' ?!

Has anyone ever finished one of your presentations Chris?

Anyways.. your terminology is ironic for a lady in the lake fake.

Expand full comment

Nothing like demonstrating total ignorance on a subject. Some might say best to say nothing rather draw attention to it. There's no lake. Notwithstanding, I can make the modest claim of being the person to expose (with evidence) the hoax carried out by the relevant police force and associated parties. Really not difficult to follow the few main errors made⬇️ but don't worry if it's too much for you.

https://open.substack.com/pub/outsidethecave/p/act-i-st-michaels-on-wyre-the-bloopers?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=27lvph

Expand full comment

Is being petty your main skill or a disposition Chris?

''a lady in the lake fake.'' applies to all elements of the sentence.🙄😂

You are far from modest, & I have yet to see any discoveries from you.

If I need to sit on the toilet for more than a minute I will check your link here & if it is good I will apologises, if it is as dire as your other indulgent waffles I will either ignore it or ridicule it, depending on my mood & time management schedule.🤔🥱

Expand full comment

He seems like the proper British version of Alex Jones.

Expand full comment

I have only read first fascinating paragraphic so far, but still however notice glaring mistake being hyped by ALL commentators making big posts about this drama.

Richard Damian Stag-Ring Hall did not confirm Eve existing or trapped in wheelchair paralysis.

It is sad to see such eye burning lies about this so often as to be always.

See page 20 of 64 pages

POINT 84

of Court Summary & READ what it states.

You will find you need to offer apology for such fantasy illusions maybee ?

or more likely you will ignore pertinent insight like petulant child & waffle about inconsequential fluff instead: as I see you do the past 4 hours with out a reply to me ! 🙄😆😂 !

Expand full comment

What's the technical term for believing that you're the center the universe?

Again we have someone, Petra by name, claiming divine knowledge but all we see is opinions that supposedly trump those of others.

Petra, here, somehow knows all of the evidence about the Manchester hoax and claims that no investigation is required. How did Petra gain this knowledge if not by investigation?

Petra tells us that many analysts proved the hoax using just their computing devices but where is that proof? What's it based on? UK Critical Thinker has 40 YT videos but where are they? If RDH hadn't mirrored them, I would never have seen them? Wow! If only someone had documented all that evidence in a physical book that couldn't be easily memory-holed!

Why didn't Richard approach high-level people? Petra did (Dr Majid) but what good did it do? Why didn't Richard do FOIs? UKCT did but what good did it do?

Petra says:

"H2: The Manchester bombing was a psyop and RDH investigated the Manchester bombing in a manner consistent with investigative journalism methods."

Here's what Brave search says about such methods:

"Additionally, some investigative journalists employ specific techniques, such as:

Undercover reporting: Journalists go undercover to gather information or conduct interviews, often using pseudonyms or disguises.

Sting operations: Journalists set up fake scenarios or transactions to catch individuals or organiations engaged in illegal or unethical behavior.

Surveillance: Journalists conduct physical or electronic surveillance to gather information or monitor individuals or organizations.

Data mining: Journalists use specialized software and techniques to extract and analyze large datasets.

Forensic analysis: Journalists use specialized expertise, such as forensic accounting or digital forensics, to analyze evidence and uncover wrongdoing.

These methods are not exhaustive, and investigative journalists often combine multiple techniques to achieve their goals."

Did you notice this? "Journalists conduct physical or electronic surveillance to gather information or monitor individuals or organizations."

Disapprobation? Really? Have you never heard: If you’re not pissing someone off, you probably aren’t doing anything important.

Petra says:

"H3: We assume H1 is proven false. Zero questions arise. Everything fits perfectly."

Clearly, you spent 2 seconds questioning your preferred hypothesis. It's exactly what I would expect from someone whose interest is selling their belief rather than soberly examining the evidence to arrive at a conclusion.

The official inquiries went into great detail about timing and position of things that never happened which gave the impression of genuine forensic investigation. They did that because they had to mimic genuine forensic investigation, the kind that genuine investigators, such as Richard D Hall, do. Why did he test everything? Because that's how you do quality research. His book, and now Iain's book, can stand as hardcopy records for future generations long after the digital world disappears into the ether.

I hate to be an arse about this but you're clearly not good at this thinking game so why not dial it back. Do more listening and less talking and see what you can learn.

Expand full comment

I must thank you for your comment, John, because you've helped me think of ways to improve my post which I'll get onto later and you've prompted me to find material I thought was completely lost.

"If RDH hadn't mirrored them, I would never have seen them? Wow! If only someone had documented all that evidence in a physical book that couldn't be easily memory-holed!"

Yes, however unlikely that may seem to you, that is the case - a great shame.

On the other hand, we do still have some of his videos which I link to in my post and highly recommend.

" ... many analysts proved the hoax using just their computing devices but where is that proof?"

Unfortunately, 2017 was the time that YouTube massively censored all the hoax videos which was also a time when there weren't other platforms with reasonable speeds to post on so a lot of videos simply were memory-holed. But here are five - in addition to the ones linked to:

Compilation of Truth by Trust One News - https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=A2HYB3ADH6R4

UK Critical Thinker - The John Barr video - https://odysee.com/@Pighooey:7/JB-video-ukct:f

Manchester Bombing Hoax Debunked - https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yn102ZpJlzyk

6 Reasons why it was a staged event - https://www.bitchute.com/video/zyOEyiWxqF6i

Manchester Crisis Acting Awards - https://www.bitchute.com/video/UPZLLGzEAeXB#t=54s

"Disapprobation? Really? Have you never heard: If you’re not pissing someone off, you probably aren’t doing anything important."

Disapprobation and "pissing people off" aren't synonymous. Whether people think Manchester was a hoax or not, they don't approve of RDH spying on a teenage girl. As Miri has pointed out, making the child participate in this fraud is a form of child abuse. Yes, spying on people can be perfectly legitimate as part of investigative journalism but in the case of Manchester there is ZERO requirement to spy on a teenage girl ... not that I think he even did that, because I think it's all staged - the child abuse of making the girl participate in this fraud isn't though.

"Why didn't Richard approach high-level people? Petra did (Dr Majid) but what good did it do? Why didn't Richard do FOIs? UKCT did but what good did it do?"

Mine wasn't really investigation and hence the quotes, I felt annoyed with Dr Majid because he was participating in an event that was against people of his own religion. Of course, they got him in to present the "balance", to reassure people well, you've got the crazy terrorists but then you've got the perfectly respectable doctors helping children.

UKCT got the information he wanted. https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=RR18XB1D1HK6

John, Can you give me a single piece of evidence or reason that doesn't support the hypothesis that Richard D. Hall is an agent and the proceedings against him were completely manufactured on both sides?

Expand full comment

“As Miri has pointed out, making the child participate in this fraud is a form of child abuse.”

That one really gives you (and Miri) away. The RDH show trial established that the Hibbert girl knew nothing about Hall until her parents told her there was ‘scary man’ stalking them. If that isn’t child abuse then I don’t know what is, yet you and the amazing Miri say nothing about it and twist it to be the fault of RDH. Not only that, but the Hibberts didn’t even know anything about RDH ‘spying’ on them until a year later when the police informed them and the BBC got involved.

It’ll be interesting (and telling) to see if a similar level of scrutiny is ever cast on the curious Miri Finch (I know it’s grim up north but furry hats in summer, really?) How impressive is it that an everyday 18 year old English student from Grimthorpe studying in the US of A knows all about vaccines and antibodies and has the knowledge and presence of mind to request a titer blood test (and all of this was pre-scamdemic)? Nothing to see here, but do look at where her finger points…

Expand full comment

If the Hibberts are crisis actors then whatever is said about the parents knowing or not knowing something and what Eve knew or didn't know has zero credibility. For goodness sake. Do you get that Manchester was a hoax or not and that there is not a single doubt that the case has been orchestrated? The only slight doubt might be is whether RDH is part of that orchestration or not but the evidence certainly fits absolutely perfectly that he is part of it and I shall make efforts to tighten my case.

I always had the feeling about RDH that he was controlled opposition and paid him very little attention because of that feeling. I didn't know anything about the Hibberts' case against him until Miri's post on it but the thing is everything her post said simply chimed in with what I had believed and know about how controlled opposition works until that point anyway. I knew the Alex Jones trial was a sham and quite a few others. Sham trials to push through agendas - not an uncommon phenomenon.

Expand full comment

How uncanny that you manage to ignore this fabulous post (link below) full of thought on the matter that you still too uninformed to comprehend. Miri came late to this, while real pioneers get no credit still.

Also I remember you having silly girl argument with writer of insight below!

https://substack.com/@dub1/p-144452874

Expand full comment

Is there a reason the link in your reply doesn't work? A 'fabulous post' sounds interesting

Expand full comment

Link works fine Chris, maybe you are blockaged ?

maybe sign out & look?

If still issue, go to 'The DubSurgeOn' profile/ Dub’s Substack & read =

Questions regarding Martin & EVE Hibbert photos substack

also using wording above you will find it via Google search as top results

by the wayside Chris, are you also Nick Cotton or friend of him ?

Expand full comment

see Iani Davisis latest substack interview with little crow girl, where it is shown what manipulative poser Miri SLOBODA is Gus, some of us are proper investigator researchers , & that is why we get abuse or ignored!

Expand full comment

It may be of some interest if that is indeed the same Miri Finch. Whilst it's not unusual for a woman to change her name when she gets married it may provide a thread to more answers on the girl who seemed to come from nowhere with all the answers. Afterall, names are important, if you know their name they're in the game.

Expand full comment

🙄😂🤣😆Of course it is same little monster , why would I lie, while so many others do that here as habit that I hate ?!

but when MiriMi mentions about silly name she misleads in smugness.

Expand full comment

Everything I've written is evidence of Richard's authenticity. As Miri says, no amount of evidence will change your opinion that was based on emotion. To quote you "I always had the feeling about RDH that he was controlled opposition..."

As I said, you aren't good at this. Maybe it's laziness or a language issue but either way, I've said my bit and I'll leave it to others to judge the strength of our arguments. I'm not trying to change your mind. I just refused to let your ramblings stand unchallenged.

Expand full comment

"Everything I've written is evidence of Richard's authenticity."

Sorry, John, I'm a little lost here. What have you said that favours his authenticity over his being an agent? You've given a list of activities of investigative reporters, however, these activities can be inappropriate in certain situations. I'm not sure what you're referring to. Do you have your own post? Can you please explain?

Expand full comment

My take is not that the Hall Affair was about villifying the truther community (Hall is hardly a nationally known figure now or before or after the case) but rather dividing that community in which it has been very successful. Which is why I think those smugly proud of their “outing an agent” are really serving the the State narrative. So perhaps the focus should be on them.

Expand full comment

Hall doesn't have to be a nationally known figure. People know who "conspiracy theorists" are so if one gets a certain prominence for behaving in a manner that it is easy for people to find reprehensible that will have an effect.

Sure, some of us calling him an agent and others believing he's genuine causes division, however, it's hard to avoid playing into that division. What are we supposed to do? Not call him out? I realised that controlled opposition is so incredibly undermining to the opposition and that is why it's my special interest. I will always call it out where I see it.

Expand full comment

People are playing these “exposure” games in a very small field and become themselves the controlled opposition even if they don’t mean to. The elites laugh at the divide and rule and carry on regardless. I suppose some truthers have pages to fill to earn a handout. Nothing wrong with that. But it is merely a backdrop and a trifling diversion.

Expand full comment

Yes, wise words: except they not only 'seem to do that', I think that it is more so they always 'ARE that' with platformed pied pipers.

Hall is shifty, but so also is these 3 little witches around cauldron= Assling, MiriMi & Petra who wears peculiar deep sea creatures transparent skin for interview recently.

Anywayhow, they all too scared of me to answer. Instead they cower like naughty girls having midnight feast in cupboards full of skeletons.

Expand full comment

The mind control is so pervasive that the Law of cause and effect is diminished. There is no diminishing the Law of cause and effect to a Dark Occultist. They know that Law is the foundation of Sorcery. ‘ The science and art of influencing change to occur in accordance with the will ( manifestation of the ego). Many people see the injustice served to Richard in the courts compartmentalised Truth. Man’s law feeding the chooks whilst the perpetrators know that Law is being broken by them.Natural Law. The Law of Cause and Effect.The 6th principle. It is a failure of the un occulted world to hold them to their own standards in this age of information.

Expand full comment

You are sadly lost in fear propaganda Andrew.

Dark is nor evil. To keep relating dark & evil is sublimated racism & a child like conception.

Law is not foundation of magic, WILL & INTENT are foundation.

If you talk on matters you have no first hand experience of you will always look like a fool & poseur regurgitating poison.

The horrors of our times are not from 'devil' worshipers (devil is fantasy bogeyman construction) but from very pious & bigoted religious fanatics such as Catholic church!🙄😂🤣😂

Expand full comment

Will and intent are correct. You do have a point about Richard. The maker of the Boston Un bombing said that he refused to engage with children tragedies because there might be a hidden tragedy that required sensitivity. It was interesting that after trumpeting a grave injustice for Tommy Mair in the Jo Cox psy op, that Tommy may well have been coerced into compliance with the Authorities. Similar to what you are asserting about him.The Rendelson UFO saga also resolved into a farce after being thought of meritoriously . The Didcott murders were very disturbing. Richard got abused and threatened because one of the suspects thought he was a gutter journalist but when he realised that Richard wasn’t like the ‘others’ he contacted Richard and co operated with him. I recommend watching that one. The Bridge end suicides were tragic, intriguing and shadowy. The Madeleine McCann epic was case solved. Brilliant work. Animal and human mutilations. Why would you call that obsessive? It’s really interesting and disturbing.. UFO and aliens. Worth watching. The two Welsh historians, Wilson and Beckett, more State corruption. The 77 subway bombings with Anthony Hill’s film The Ripple effect. 911 of course. Richard may have made an error in judgement with Manchester or he may have been up for crucifixation. Leave his integrity alone. His body of work is outstanding and you are not a balanced individual.

Expand full comment

Hall isn’t shifty. Hall has a mission statement to get closer to the Truth. Hall loves Truth. We co create this reality with Creation itself. Truth is God. The Dark occultists also love Truth. It is the great mass of humanity that have been mind controlled into diminishing Truth through the promotion of solipsism and the belief in authority. The Dark Occultists have an Achilles heel with morality but since they have humanity well and truly in their pocket in regards to Truth, they don’t have to worry about morality. To know Richards work is to know him. He is not shifty. He is a hero.

Expand full comment

HALL has obsession with animal genital mutilation. Obsession with outer-space secret missions that are impossible from what is known of Earths functioning's, & ufos he has never photographed. He is obsessed by little girl with keyhole blemish in eye. Hhe is here to sell fear. He is rude & arrogant to peoples trying to help him. He is stupid & arrogant to go to court as he did. He is parasite getting money off others for his dilemma.

& HE HAS DONE ALMOST NO WORK FOR 4 YEARS & DOESNT MAKE ANY EFFORT TO DO SO NOW.

My friends gave much good advice on legal situation & how to undermine Hibberts claims, yet get abuse & stalked for several months here (from Halls biggest fan) & you think you can tell me Hall is a decent man ? 🙄😂🤣😂

Hall is complicit in whole farce & until you wake up to that fact you are also complicit in the farce of lies & deceit.

Expand full comment

You offer no actual proof yet on that claim though Petra.

You just mimic MiriMi & mad hatter Asling OL.

Is this all envy?

It all seems so controlled on both sides it is un-natural & has decomposing fish like stench.

All we need now is stalker pervert pests like ProLies or Billiam MalCome to plop up out of sewer & make even bigger pong about it!

Expand full comment

Petra.

Interesting article and views.

What about UKCT, was he "controlled opposition"/ an "agent" also?

He arrived on the scene from nowhere; produced very professional looking videos on past events then (as if right on queue) Manchester happened and he produced 40+ videos on that then gave up!

UKCT also met with RDH and handed over all his research to RDH.

Expand full comment

Handed all his material over which has now vanished. Yes it is a little odd. All I can say is he seems genuine and there's nothing about his material itself which strikes me as misleading. I know they have CO at the very highest level so he could be but there's nothing I've seen that suggests he is except what's happened with his videos is odd. I read somewhere he was given a hard time by the authorities but have no idea if that's true and what that means exactly.

Expand full comment

Most of UKCT's material is still available to watch (but not on RDH's website).

UKCT also always seemed genuine to me. I think it is too easy to put a magnifying glass on one or two smaller things and blow them up to be more than they really are. What I think is most important is not to focus on the presenter but their content and analyse the content to see if that stacks up.

I.ve just watched your interview with Brendam Murphy. Near the start where you were mentioning YT channels from Australia (mainly Melbourne), you brought my some very fond memories. You listed Anaconda MaltLiquor and (the late, great) Woodrow Wobbles.

Before you recalled Woodrow's name you said that the channel matched music to their videos so well. Before you said Woodrwo's name, I immediately thought you were referring to Smoken Mirrors because he was based in Melbourne and he always had very apt music playing for whatever was being shown.

Apart from the catchy intro that Woodrow used to use on all his videos, I did not remember him using much music in his videos. Is it possible that you mixed up Woodrow and Smoken?

Expand full comment

So nice that you remember those guys too. I'd forgotten Smoken Mirrors. I also should have mentioned Peekay. Some of his videos are absolutely hilarious.

No definitely Woodrow Wobbles aka George Pouki. Smoken Mirrors may also have matched music to his videos but obviously I remember WW's better.

Here's a few brilliant examples. Absolutely love 'em!

Las Vegas - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx7EVdX-71w

Parson's Green - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_ytpEPiO7U

Parkland - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt0fkI5ZdVQ

This is a reposted one on 153news.net on Las Vegas under the poster name Woodrow but I think it's an AML video because it ends with what I believe is his signature "Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit no more drinks for me thanks". That was AML's signature wasn't it?

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=GOOMUN3W73G2

Expand full comment

Thanks for the links to the videos. I watched them all and they brought back great memories of George, who I was friendly with.

The one on 153 news is also one of his as the "booshit booshit booshit" was what he nearly always signed off with.

Peekay was (and still is) hilarious. I tried to find some of Smoken's videos but there are not many left on YT because (like AML) he kept getting his channels taken down, although AML seemed to hold the record for most channels removed!

Here's a couple of Smoken's with music:

Manchester: https://youtu.be/26M-VDla0iA?si=kzARtNqs2_7zFfnm

London (2 events): https://youtu.be/mqiMhUOZmrI?si=MYYLaApJV0A_FZJu

And a Manchester funny one without music: https://youtu.be/OgSD7e4HhhU?si=YXsVLiXPDYXJEji6

Thanks for rekindling some fond memories!

Expand full comment

No. That’s not what’s happening.

What’s going on is that Limited Hangouts do what? What is their real purpose?

1) Exposing Limited Truth

2) Misdirection

3) Limited Hangouts protect the much bigger lies, the much worse frauds played on the entirety of humanity :

These are big lies that I’ve yet to see any notable “alt media” outlet or known name expound, including Petra, Miri, Davis and Aisling.

Expand full comment

Richard D Hall, an agent? You’ve lost your mind! 😂

Expand full comment

Interesting take Petra. We must remember zero evidence has been produced to support the claim the victims of the Manchester Arena bombing are crisis actors. There's nothing. Richard D Hall's statement analysis was deliberately misleading as was his commentary over vital pieces of evidence like the Barr footage. He has gone out of his way to direct his audience to a false conclusion: no bomb, no victims. Also I've noted UK Critical Thinker's interview with Ole Dammegard has been removed from the Internet for some reason. I did find a clip of Ole Dammegard openly misleading his audience in an interview with Jim Fetzer from June 2017 where he claims nobody was in the arena that night except crisis actors. This is just another striking example of why we can't trust these false flag 'experts'. They have their own agendas. https://rumble.com/v5scagt-lets-see-what-the-worlds-leading-false-flag-expert-had-to-say-on-manchester.html

Like who is UK Critical Thinker anyway? I've spotted misdirection in his work too. He claimed the concert goers were racing down the stairs after getting their cue from a starter gun. Again zero evidence to support this outrageous claim. I think we're into very dark territory when we disbelieve witness testimonies in favour of Internet speculation that amounts to dust.

Expand full comment

There's clearly a lot more subversion going on around the Manchester event than a lot of people realise. Most people see it as as a very simple thing, whether 'real' or 'fake' or 'false flag' or whatever. This kind of thing only serves to misdirect.

One of the glaring anomalies for me is that the people who claim fakery make use of these little video clips (like the Barr video) and photos and so on, which do, actually, provide evidence of 'fakery'. But that is precisely the suspicious point. If this was 'fakery' then why would they release these 'crucial' pieces of evidence into the public domain (to be conveniently seized on by those claiming fakery)?! There is clearly an agenda there. They are providing exactly the kind of information required for the 'researchers' to create a narrative.

It is indeed interesting - and revealing - that as far as I know these researchers haven't questioned the provenance of these 'allegedly damning pieces of evidence'. They haven't asked the crucial question - these pieces of evidence were deliberately released for us to find and draw logical conclusions from, so what is the purpose behind that, and how, in fact, can we trust that evidence, if we are saying it comes from the very people who were involved in 'fakery'.

These are the real questions which a counter-espionage analyst would ask. They wouldn't get hooked in by the 'deliberately fabricated evidence which just so happened to fall into my lap'.

As an aside - this is a very, very strong argument for a real Manchester Arena bombing which was then 'overlayed' with a pre-filmed 'fake bombing'. The 'fake' being given to the 'conspiracy theorists' to use for discrediting purposes. All those images and videos, after all, are from a fake, not a real bombing. Therefore, they couldn't have taken place on the same day.

Intriguing. An excellent case study for subversion studies 101.

Expand full comment

A most fascinating case study Evelyn. I don't trust the official narrative nor the unofficial one. There's definitely more to it than meets the eye. One thing's for certain, those of a conspiratorial mindset are being encouraged to draw the wrong conclusion. There are traps laid everywhere.

Expand full comment

And YOU have well and truly fallen into them

Expand full comment

"These are the real questions which a counter-espionage analyst would ask."

Your credentials, please?

(This place is filling up with nutters or bots)

Expand full comment

Now look here old chap, I think it’s ruddy orf of you to ask a girl for her credentials in a public arena. It’s just not dashed professional, darn it. You should know my credentials are highly classified information. I should be asking you, John, what your clearance level is, asking a girl such an impertinent question when the world and his dog are listening. My credentials are on a need to know basis. And you, John, don’t have a need to know.

That’s the nutters and bots of intelligence work, that is.

Expand full comment

Aisling, to simplify, let's ignore the work of other analysts and simply go directly to the media stories where we can determine the serious anomalies ourselves.

As I point out, the headlining photo is of a girl in hospital showing no signs of the "wounds you would see on a battlefield" described by Dr Ibrar Majid. If you go to the Daily Mail story (linked below) you will see other children showing the same complete absence of injury as the girl in the headlining photo. In fact, nowhere will you see examples of convincing evidence of "wounds you would see on a battlefield." What we see is the typical psyop characteristic of a discrepancy between SHOW and TELL. They TELL you one thing but they SHOW you another.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4541026/The-Queen-visits-Royal-Manchester-Children-s-Hospital.html

As Miri said in her chat with you, the burden of proof is on the media to prove their claims of a bombing. They haven't done that.

If you're defending the official narrative then as its defender, the initial burden of proof is on you, not on me to prove that Manchester was essentially a "live" drill pushed out as a real event aka hoax aka psyop. The INITIAL burden is on you.

What first needs to be established is what is expected of "live" drills and what is expected from a real event. From both types of event we expect:

--- the appearance - at least - of the type of event said to have happened

--- people who appear to be victims, loved ones and witnesses

Many things we expect of BOTH types of event REAL and FAKE so we cannot just say, "that witness sounds convincing to me," because we expect people who appear to be witnesses in both types of events and as Miri said in your chat, what sounds convincing to one person, doesn't sound convincing to another.

Stuart and Figen Murray absolutely do not sound in the least bit convincing to me and in my response to John Jasper I cite a comment from someone who claims perfectly reasonably that prior to Manchester he'd never suspected events to be faked but he could not believe these parents. I put a link to them now and I ask you to tell me if you think they are acting - even remotely - like people who've just lost a son. The Murrays appear at 54 secs in but the whole video is only 3 min and worth watching. Aisling, do you think ANY of these people seem remotely convincing?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UPZLLGzEAeXB

OK, if you accept their behaviour as consistent with people who've just lost a son so be it but there is no way that you can ask me to accept it as consistent because I don't and obviously other people don't either.

So as the INITIAL burden of proof is on the media to prove their story and anyone who defends their story the burden starts with you, Aisling, to prove that a terror event really did happen and you cannot simply put forward items of evidence that fit both REAL and FAKE.

You cannot say a witness or loved one sounds convincing to you. What else do you have?

Expand full comment

What is so bad about Darkness ?

Why is it made into evil in so many minds on interweb?

Is it subliminal racism?

I notice new life never grow in strong light but need darkness.

I travel far & wide, & find in hot places night time is better to socialise & peoples sleep during pounding rays of sun when highest. They love darkness & moonlight.

When I sleep I make room become absolute darkness for comfort & quite.

I love darkness, but also love the light when necessary , should I have to chose one or other for balanced existence: & if I chose I prefer darkness will that make me minion of devils ?

UPDATED after 5 days.

What a surprise= no answer from cowardly actress pretending to be a warrior.

These pretenders want our time & energy, yet what substance is behind their wailings,

nothing , they are arrogant & aloof unless towards one of many paid-for sicko-phantasms.

Expand full comment

Rich coming from someone whose main debating argument is just shouting over her opponent.

Expand full comment

Do you hear shouting while you read Johnny Jaffer, you content-less crank?

Synesthesia troubling again you pathetic wreck of a thing!

Do you think CAPS are shouting while you read as well?

Maybe it is your own voice shouting while you type?

You have now proven you are a masochist desperate to be abused,

a team member of BBC Bitch MC.Liar(e) Springs cluster of persistent piddling troll bots,

& a less than mediocre commentator just going through the same apologist motions we are all bored & over familiar with.

Let's see what a lonely piece of alienated shit you really are & keep responding like a no-life Time Vampire ?

tROT ON Jaffman, as you will.

Expand full comment

I now whisper to you Jafferman John,

''go fuck yourself, you convince no one with your troll standard avatar, & virtue signalling pose'', we know your agenda here, & it is out of date so bad it stinks.

Expand full comment

The burden of proof is not on those who disbelieve claims of alleged victims, alleged bombs, alleged terror and alleged injuries (which *not* coincidentally lead to all the stated agendas of the cryptoctacy, such as trauma based mind control, increased police presence, increased militarization of police, increased surveillance, increased censorship, digital IDs, technocracy, digital fences within a panopticon, digitalID requirements for ticket purchases, the abolition of cash etc., etc) but actually rests entirely on the faux authorities and their media (Medea) minions who repeat the claims ad nauseam with no evidence other than hearsay:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Application

Expand full comment

If it was a hoax then were children maimed and killed?

Did the children actually ever exist if so where is the proof that they are alive and well?

Expand full comment

All fake and no evidence showing the children are alive and well however that is only to be expected and you don't need proof of their aliveness to prove the event was staged. I know someone who knows the parents of a child who was in the same class as a child whose mother allegedly died. I also know a child who was in the same class as a boy who allegedly died in the Barcelona van rampage, another staged event.

Expand full comment

Evidence needed

Expand full comment

Why?

Expand full comment

Could you please comment on the Boston Unbombing video that Richard D Hall posted on his Richplanet site in support of his Truth perspective in regards to this genre of hoax that is perpetrated by Governments. I do not consider Hall a propoganda tool. I consider you a propoganda tool.

Expand full comment

Whichever anon clique you belong to, the message to not draw attention hasn't got to you.

Interesting this effort comes a few hours after a cordial exchange between Iain any myself on X, to which he ultimately had no response to the issue of establishment-led "uncensored" content & propaganda which is what most stick to (I don't).

That's just the one post example.

Information that would lead to the Home Office (Government) coming unstuck in the most dramatic fashion. The same authorities in Manchester arena hoax BTW.

You stick to bit-part role players enrolled in these government productions though, pretend there's something original to offer (as the Establishment dictates).

Expand full comment

If you can find me one Clip of Ole D ever saying ROTM and admit you took my link to the Gaza makeup artist from that entire spiel I wrote on the war fakery, on OG I’ll show you. Otherwise, no.

Expand full comment

You're the one making the claim.on Marciano and if you don't want to back it up so be it.

I'd have no chance in finding the video in which Ole D. explains RoM but so what? How is that important?

Please give me link to Gaza make-up artist. I'd have no trouble admitting I took any link from you but I don't know what link you're referring to. Fakenukes on Bitchute does a lot of videos on the Israel / Palestinian fakery and that's where I got my info.

Expand full comment

I don’t need to back up FACTS.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KHFdho9KWFU

1.26: first unmistakeable Masonic hand gesture.

Second, different Masonic hand gesture at 3.23

NOTE the Masonic numerology on the timestamps.

Ole never says ROTM. It’s not his phrase. It’s from a US author I used to read 20 years ago.

FNPhil didn’t have that makeup artist link, nor does he have any outbound links. I found that makeup artist link independent of Phil.

Everyone knows GEOENGINEERING WATCH is one of the biggest controlled opp shill sites, promoted by Kevin Shipp - who claims he’s ex-CIA. GeoWatch have their own legal hoax psyop:

https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2022/09/19/researchers-hit-with-lawsuits-for-fact-checking-climate-claims/?slreturn=2024121142837

So why would the European version “TANKER ENEMY” 😂 run by (allegedly) 2 brothers (the 2 Masonic pillars, Gemini and a duality reference) be any different, than the other CO shill front, feigning persecution and prosecution? The fact that one shill operation is promoting the hoax of another is hilarious and ironic.

https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/italian-authorities-move-to-shut-down-tanker-enemy-website/

The Masonic numerology alone in that story screams hoax.

If I search, “TANKER ENEMY” and its site is the number one result in bing, and they’re still on YouTube with 31k views, it’s absurd to believe they’re being suppressed in any way.

Expand full comment

R D H used to do speaking tours with a similar subject to his talks on his website Richplanet.net.

The first one I heard was in 2007, part of an event with other speakers. He talked about animal mutilation. The last one was about the murder of Jo Cox and how the wrong person was in prison. I thought that he had made a convincing case.

Thomas Mair is a patsy not an assassin.

Will anyone be able to help him? It reminds me of the Jill Dando shooting.

I hope that he will be granted justice.

Expand full comment

Barbara, you know that the Jo Cox thing was staged so the prison thing is staged too ... and RDH doesn't know?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IYWbTH32M0Ks

Expand full comment