When you apply pure logic like you did here the only reasonable alternative is that none of it was real. Something very similar was done with the Lincoln assassination as well. None of it adds up either. These people get off on everything people believe actually being fake.
Reject it all. Jay Wiedner has a new film out that starts over and includes the parts we skipped. If you look at it in this like, it answers how it was done. I would like your take on it, wrote about it here:
Ah Yes Petra.... I remember discussing CE #399 with Proton and yourself a few months back and you said you were going to do more research....Thank You!
The only narrative, theory, story that fits tightest is that it is all fake, a movie, a production, a play on a stage in a theater'
and then to have CE#399 ,the damage it supposedly did while in the condition it was found forces people who will not think out or excogitate these facts to accepting the lie, a lie they will not speak against or question despite the bullets condition that has Lie written all over it.
Also to note the bullet went through the knot of the tie amongst all the other things listed, that alone should have caused damage more so then what is seen from CE#399.
The fact that it is called the magic (deception) bullet.....says it all!
nice read, TQ. Oswald's CNN stills seem to indicate an outdoor setting, as in: discernable sunlight shining into the scene from the right side, illuminating all of the participants' (actors') left side.
since the 'official' photograph of Oswald's alleged shooting depicts a staged event, hasn't it been debunked before?
A while ago, you gave me a link to a wonderful to JFK film on Youtube. No point looking for it there. They hide the best material. I have mislaid it. It was over 2 hours long maybe 3. Do you recall? If you do, would you mind sending it to me again. It dealt with the devious role of people like Allen Dulles
It was a movie set, the whole thing was a scripted ritual, like most his-story; just theatre for the masses
Yes, a theater and they were all in on it because they all agreed to get into an unprotected car in the middle of a jungle.
When you apply pure logic like you did here the only reasonable alternative is that none of it was real. Something very similar was done with the Lincoln assassination as well. None of it adds up either. These people get off on everything people believe actually being fake.
Reject it all. Jay Wiedner has a new film out that starts over and includes the parts we skipped. If you look at it in this like, it answers how it was done. I would like your take on it, wrote about it here:
https://jeromearmstrong.substack.com/p/fake-jfk-x-movie-kennedy-squib-assassination
Ah Yes Petra.... I remember discussing CE #399 with Proton and yourself a few months back and you said you were going to do more research....Thank You!
The only narrative, theory, story that fits tightest is that it is all fake, a movie, a production, a play on a stage in a theater'
and then to have CE#399 ,the damage it supposedly did while in the condition it was found forces people who will not think out or excogitate these facts to accepting the lie, a lie they will not speak against or question despite the bullets condition that has Lie written all over it.
Also to note the bullet went through the knot of the tie amongst all the other things listed, that alone should have caused damage more so then what is seen from CE#399.
The fact that it is called the magic (deception) bullet.....says it all!
You ever seen this? From "JFK To 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick"
A clip from the full 3h docci: https://odysee.com/@wonderingwhatif:b/JFK's-killer:2
nice read, TQ. Oswald's CNN stills seem to indicate an outdoor setting, as in: discernable sunlight shining into the scene from the right side, illuminating all of the participants' (actors') left side.
since the 'official' photograph of Oswald's alleged shooting depicts a staged event, hasn't it been debunked before?
Hi Petra
A while ago, you gave me a link to a wonderful to JFK film on Youtube. No point looking for it there. They hide the best material. I have mislaid it. It was over 2 hours long maybe 3. Do you recall? If you do, would you mind sending it to me again. It dealt with the devious role of people like Allen Dulles