It sounds like something a KAOS agent would say on an episode of Get Smart from the late 60's. It would have been too stupid to be in a newspaper back then.
When the RT-PCR “test” was approved as the gold standard for detection of COVID, I suspected was afoot. First, it established in the first two weeks of February 2020... well before any American deaths. Secondly, the test was not quantitative which made zero sense and sure enough that became a huge mistake/problem. Thirdly, all the decisions were made in a vacuum without recognizing the public sector. Fourthly, there was never a deviation, regarding the testing, even though the virus morphs into variations.
In short, the powers had a test in place before they had the virus fully defined and distinct from any other virus. You only need to control the outcome of the test to support your predetermined conclusions and the powers did that to perfection. The additional touch was when “asymptomatic “ transmission hit the scene, this provides an answer to those who never got sick and were never tested for they were going to be a problem as the narrative had to be successful. A person, like Fauci, is needed as the figurehead... a person who is totally self absorbed and beholden to the government. The general population never had a chance but brave souls like the Barrington Group saved our collective behinds
No but that requires a higher level of knowledge. I wanted to make the point that anyone can work out it was a scam even without the ability to read scientific papers. In fact, this post is a rehash of an earlier one (https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/critical-thinking-the-moon-landings-924) where the lack of isolation of the virus is mentioned. The reason I rehashed it was simply to make the point about "misinformation" being a propaganda term. And I didn't simply look at all these government sources directly myself although in a few cases I did. For example, the point about excess mortality in Europe is based on a video by Dr Sam Bailey (https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/excess-mortality-what-you-aren-t-being:0), however, one can still go to the source. Actually, I should acknowledge her in the post.
Let's put it this way... No One has proven they do. And after 100+ years of virus claims with no proof, I have to give the probability that They exist approaching zero.
That's the trick isn't it? The ''probability'' game. ''They'' can ''what if'' forever............what if they find BigFoot, a werewolf, a mutant turtle. Right here, right now, in this court, there ain't no virus.
Well... My bringing up of probability has to do with the approach I was taught... My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. When new data come along that better explain what I see, I will indeed adjust My probabilities.
This has stood Me in good stead, and I was awake before 9/11. Because the best explanations for what I saw were that there was a controlling group on Our planet.
And so, with My research, I conclude that the probability that there's such a thing as a virus approach zero.
Whilst the monsters are in control of the 'education' system/curriculum there is very little hope that a sufficient number of 'ordinary' people (i.e. a critical mass) will be reached to actually change things. There are a whole load of psychological reasons for this of course which would require a thesis I'm not going to drone on about here. People take the path of least resistance, though.
One thing that is interesting (and saddening) to think about is when I think back to the way things were, say, 30 years ago. I don't know if it's just me but more people seemed more capable of thinking for themselves then. But now, it doesn't appear that way, and even young people, who should really know better, have been honeypotted and hoodwinked into focusing their energies into manufactured issues (global warmism being an obvious one). Back in my day, for fear of sounding old now, certainly none of the people I knew would've given these things the time of day. Instead, we would've just laughed at it, and the people spouting it. In other words, we had a kind of very healthy scepticism, because we simply knew that the Establishment was full of mendacious arseholes who should never be taken as any voice of authority.
That attitude seems to have been lost along the way somewhere. They say subversion takes a generation - well - that generation has happened (and will be passed on to the next generation, and the next, until all the lies they are told will become 'accepted facts', never to be questioned, or even thought about anymore).
I'm sure the Internet has something to do with it, of course. But even so.
Maybe the music simply isn't good enough anymore...
Yeah. That's it. It's the lack of any decent music that's the thing.
From the first videos of People (reportedly) in China stage-falling face first to the end (?) of the Covid plannedemic, I sat amazed anyOne was buying it. The logic of it all failed miserably, and as the exercises came to light, the "tests" questioned, and on and on, I was aghast! Why did People want to cast logic away and be fearful??? Why did They want to believe that jabbing toxins into Their flesh would save Them somehow?
And given that there was zero support for the existence of ANY virus - or contagion... Why did Most cling to that narrative and reject the logical conclusions?
Perhaps I will never know and just have to chalk it up to severe indoctrination.
Thanks. Same. As soon as they showed us the falling-on-facers and people laid out on floors and on the ground I knew it was a psyop and being a psyop I knew there wouldn't be a virus because they only wanted us to BELIEVE in one they didn't want one for real - not that they could have had one for real anyway but I didn't know that at the time.
I had encountered the “no-virus” idea prior, but was unsure, had done no research. Once all the highly suspicious stuff started happening, I went out and dug into it.
Sure enough, the foundation solidly appeared to be Rockefeller lies taught as truth, with nothing scientific to prop them.
Foxes guarding the linguistic henhouse
The U.S. government system will not fix the U.S. government.
You might as well say “... freedom is out of control.”
"the first amendment is out of control"
It sounds like something a KAOS agent would say on an episode of Get Smart from the late 60's. It would have been too stupid to be in a newspaper back then.
Good point! Currently, the entire administration, is under the Cone of Silence.
in a September 2023 RealClear Opinion poll, one-third of Democratic voters said that Americans have “too much freedom.”
That's hilarious.
Yes. Too bad it's not a joke.
This headline is too funny:
"The First Amendment Is Out Of Control"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html
from the New York Times: all the news, their fingerprint.
It proves the ruling class is panicking.
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/they-are-panicking
That they will lose is inevitable. So what comes after?
What Is To What Is To Be
A bird's-eye view for us down here
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/what-is-to-what-is-to-be
Astounding!!! I keep suggesting:
Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting
When the RT-PCR “test” was approved as the gold standard for detection of COVID, I suspected was afoot. First, it established in the first two weeks of February 2020... well before any American deaths. Secondly, the test was not quantitative which made zero sense and sure enough that became a huge mistake/problem. Thirdly, all the decisions were made in a vacuum without recognizing the public sector. Fourthly, there was never a deviation, regarding the testing, even though the virus morphs into variations.
In short, the powers had a test in place before they had the virus fully defined and distinct from any other virus. You only need to control the outcome of the test to support your predetermined conclusions and the powers did that to perfection. The additional touch was when “asymptomatic “ transmission hit the scene, this provides an answer to those who never got sick and were never tested for they were going to be a problem as the narrative had to be successful. A person, like Fauci, is needed as the figurehead... a person who is totally self absorbed and beholden to the government. The general population never had a chance but brave souls like the Barrington Group saved our collective behinds
Btw, excellent article!
Yeah well Fauci was already well-practised with the HIV > AIDS psyop.
Humbly, I would like to point out that the foundation - "viruses" and "contagion" - have zero proof... I did an article on this:
A Post to Be Viral (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/a-post-to-be-viral
Has a virus that causes cv been isolated?
No but that requires a higher level of knowledge. I wanted to make the point that anyone can work out it was a scam even without the ability to read scientific papers. In fact, this post is a rehash of an earlier one (https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/critical-thinking-the-moon-landings-924) where the lack of isolation of the virus is mentioned. The reason I rehashed it was simply to make the point about "misinformation" being a propaganda term. And I didn't simply look at all these government sources directly myself although in a few cases I did. For example, the point about excess mortality in Europe is based on a video by Dr Sam Bailey (https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/excess-mortality-what-you-aren-t-being:0), however, one can still go to the source. Actually, I should acknowledge her in the post.
No virus has ever been isolated... See:
A Post to Be Viral (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/a-post-to-be-viral
So viruses don't exist, right?
Let's put it this way... No One has proven they do. And after 100+ years of virus claims with no proof, I have to give the probability that They exist approaching zero.
That's the trick isn't it? The ''probability'' game. ''They'' can ''what if'' forever............what if they find BigFoot, a werewolf, a mutant turtle. Right here, right now, in this court, there ain't no virus.
Well... My bringing up of probability has to do with the approach I was taught... My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. When new data come along that better explain what I see, I will indeed adjust My probabilities.
This has stood Me in good stead, and I was awake before 9/11. Because the best explanations for what I saw were that there was a controlling group on Our planet.
And so, with My research, I conclude that the probability that there's such a thing as a virus approach zero.
Whilst the monsters are in control of the 'education' system/curriculum there is very little hope that a sufficient number of 'ordinary' people (i.e. a critical mass) will be reached to actually change things. There are a whole load of psychological reasons for this of course which would require a thesis I'm not going to drone on about here. People take the path of least resistance, though.
One thing that is interesting (and saddening) to think about is when I think back to the way things were, say, 30 years ago. I don't know if it's just me but more people seemed more capable of thinking for themselves then. But now, it doesn't appear that way, and even young people, who should really know better, have been honeypotted and hoodwinked into focusing their energies into manufactured issues (global warmism being an obvious one). Back in my day, for fear of sounding old now, certainly none of the people I knew would've given these things the time of day. Instead, we would've just laughed at it, and the people spouting it. In other words, we had a kind of very healthy scepticism, because we simply knew that the Establishment was full of mendacious arseholes who should never be taken as any voice of authority.
That attitude seems to have been lost along the way somewhere. They say subversion takes a generation - well - that generation has happened (and will be passed on to the next generation, and the next, until all the lies they are told will become 'accepted facts', never to be questioned, or even thought about anymore).
I'm sure the Internet has something to do with it, of course. But even so.
Maybe the music simply isn't good enough anymore...
Yeah. That's it. It's the lack of any decent music that's the thing.
From the first videos of People (reportedly) in China stage-falling face first to the end (?) of the Covid plannedemic, I sat amazed anyOne was buying it. The logic of it all failed miserably, and as the exercises came to light, the "tests" questioned, and on and on, I was aghast! Why did People want to cast logic away and be fearful??? Why did They want to believe that jabbing toxins into Their flesh would save Them somehow?
And given that there was zero support for the existence of ANY virus - or contagion... Why did Most cling to that narrative and reject the logical conclusions?
Perhaps I will never know and just have to chalk it up to severe indoctrination.
Excellent piece!!!
Thanks. Same. As soon as they showed us the falling-on-facers and people laid out on floors and on the ground I knew it was a psyop and being a psyop I knew there wouldn't be a virus because they only wanted us to BELIEVE in one they didn't want one for real - not that they could have had one for real anyway but I didn't know that at the time.
I had encountered the “no-virus” idea prior, but was unsure, had done no research. Once all the highly suspicious stuff started happening, I went out and dug into it.
Sure enough, the foundation solidly appeared to be Rockefeller lies taught as truth, with nothing scientific to prop them.
Thank You for the wonderful article!