Trump's smoking gun - What the hell is that? by Omar Jordan

I hope Omar doesn’t mind me republishing his post which entertainingly points out a few key features of this event and makes interesting connections.

---

by Omar Jordan

July 15, 2024

Don’t you worry, I’ll make it quick so that you don’t have to read through pages and pages of analysis. As usual, this is just my opinion, based on the available evidence, the vast majority of it, bullshit and misdirects.

So let’s start with the standard disclaimer which is that of course there is no way that I (or anyone else) could definitively prove that this event is a staged or partially staged hoax. What I will do instead is just examine the possibility that the entire thing could have been faked.

If it was faked, then how would they fake it? Well, they’d start by convincing you that there were “real bullets” flying through the air in Butler, PA, and they’d use methods such as publishing this ridiculously improbable photo.

This photo is meant to have captured a “whizzing bullet” flying by Trump’s head. We are meant to believe that this is either the bullet that “grazed his ear” or another bullet. Nevermind the odds of a bullet grazing his ear, but let’s all at least admit it is a one in a trillion type of possibility. MAGA-tards will tell you it was “divine intervention” or that he had an “angel on his shoulder” and some such narrative like that. You are free to believe that sort of thing, if it makes you feel good.

Now I won’t go into some long analysis about whether or not it was possible to even capture this “whizzing bullet” with the camera that was used (a Nikon Z9). You can research that for yourself if you are so inclined or care that much. Let’s just agree that it’s possible, regardless of how likely or unlikely. Let’s also acknowledge that the cameraman was shooting non-stop, so this isn’t out of the question, nor is it a “stroke of luck” as this would just be one of a hundred frames he captured. But if this was a hoax, then this portion of it would be tasked to a photographer-agent type of person.

Enter Doug Mills - (born 1960) - an American photographer who has covered the White House since 1983.^[1] He began working for The New York Times in 2002, having previously been the chief photographer for The Associated Press in Washington, in which capacity he won two Pulitzer prizes for team coverage. As of February 2019 he is a board member of the White House Correspondents' Association. 

Doug also just happened to be Johnny on the Spot on the morning of 9/11 when he captured yet another “iconic photo” of George W. Bush “receiving the news” about the second fake airplane (Flight 175) hitting the south tower.

So, we have a 9/11 connection which is common in modern day PsyOps.

Doug was also there when Clinton brokered the Mid-East “peace” deal, another “iconic photo” for his resume:

Of course it’s not completely out of the question, since Doug worked for the White House and would be present for many Presidents’ events. The problem is, at some point you have to consider these “one in a million” things all together, not just individually. In any case, we now have the realism of a bullet, or multiple bullets, thanks to Doug - who probably works for intelligence and his photo could easily be photoshopped by advanced software available to only the military and intelligence agencies. So there’s no way we can prove that it’s photoshopped, and there’s no way we can prove that it’s real, either. Unfortunately, that’s just how these things go…

Next we also have the “spray” from the hydraulics of the crane which has a very “Hollywood” or “Universal Studios” feel to it. You can view a screenshot of it below and you can view the video of it here.

So if this was faked, this little bit would also help to create the illusion of real bullets flying everywhere.

Then we get all of the standard fingerprints that we have seen over and over again in previous PsyOps and Hoaxes. The scrawny lone gunman Adam Lanza-type character with whatever political leanings or mental health issues, to create those narratives. The “lapses in security” storylines. The “inside job” or “they stood down” conspiracy angles.

The “Deep State” narratives.

All of these cartoon storylines are repeated over and over again from Sandy Hoax to Boston Bombing to 9/11 to JFK, etc.

You will always get the Second Gunman on the Grassy Knoll, the Wuhan Lab Leak, the Woman with the Polka Dot Dress or the FBI agent that was seen running into the woods. But if this is a hoax, all of that is bullshit conspiracy candy and misdirection - and since it’s everywhere around this event, it signals that we should look closer for the Hoax angle.

Then of course we have all the “eyewitnesses” who heard this or saw that and their stories end up overlapping in some areas and conflicting in others. This is done deliberately to create mass confusion and chaos, and they certainly could have planted misdirects at the Live event as well (like firecracker type devices in certain areas, as a hypothetical example).

When I say “Live Event” - I mean that if this was faked, it would have been a live performance or “street theater” type of event - where the vast, vast majority of people that are in attendance are innocent, bystanding civilians, attending a Trump rally, and a magic trick is performed right in front of them. So it’s real you see, because they all saw it with their own eyes and to suggest otherwise would be completely insane and “how dare you?”

You know, like how thousands of people saw David Copperfield make the Statue of Liberty disappear in 1983. “I was there, I saw it with my own eyes…”

Well, that magic trick can be explained, but what if it couldn’t? What if you didn’t have an explanation for it? Would you then conclude that he really made the Statue of Liberty disappear? Of course not.

In any case, a hoax would also mean that Trump either used fake blood (unlikely), or was “bladed” by his secret service guys when he went down to the ground (likely) which he learned from Vince McMahon. Trump is, of course, a master of Kayfabe.

Putting the multiple snipers in plain view of everyone at the event (including the cameras) is also perfect for a Hoax angle because then they can spin all of the narratives about why they didn’t shoot early, they were told to stand down, and so on… further cementing the idea that there were real shots fired, while keeping you focused on the wrong things.

As far as the audio goes, real shots or military “blanks” may have been fired or even pre-recorded (from the correct distance) and played on the loudspeakers. Do you think any of those MAGA-tards would know the difference in the middle of all of that chaos and confusion?

Now the main problem with the Hoax angle is the alleged “dead bodies” (and injured ones), including the shooter - which is the most difficult thing to account for, since there are multiple videos of the dead/injured. But, as usual you only get a glance because, well - there’s too many people in the way.

With an unlimited black ops budget, it wouldn’t be too difficult to put a couple of folks in the corners of those bleachers, surround them with a dozen or so agents who would then quickly surround them and cover them up a few minutes later, after squibs and fake blood / gore / injuries were deployed and while everyone was focused on Trump and/or taking cover.

Nobody would be looking in that direction for at least a minute or so, and by then it would be difficult to see anything in detail on the floors of those bleachers, with all of those possible “agent” bystanders crowding around the few injured people, some of them attending to their “wounds” - which is why we can’t make out much in the videos other than a few moments of mostly obscured glimpses.

Cover their faces with towels and cart them off quickly. Give them some new identities as part of a witness protection type of program, a big pile of cash and they can ride off into the sunset with a new life, somewhere in paradise. Remember that after only 48 hours, the main victim’s GoFundMe had already reached over a million dollars and that doesn’t include the government / military / intelligence money that one would receive in this hypothetical scenario. Is the suggestion really that far-fetched?

I know, I know - “how dare you?”

Next you will ask - well what about the shooter?  I dunno, maybe they put a real bullet in his head as the one sacrifice for the event, as part of whatever sick and twisted cult ritual these psychopaths engage in. That would also certainly help make the entire thing feel more real, and provide real bullets and the sounds of those bullets as well. But does it even matter?

I’d argue that most of these details really don’t matter. All the minutiae, all the conspiracy candy will be researched for years to come and I promise you, it won’t go anywhere and they’ll have you running in circles for decades, just like JFK. But nobody shot JFK either, so why should any of this be different? Why fix what isn’t broken?

So I’m not going to waste anymore of your time analyzing eyewitness testimony, the shooter’s vantage point, angle of the bullets, the secret service’s actions, the sounds of this or that, the amateur footage, the suspicious characters in the stands, the “patsy” narrative, the things that “don’t add up,” etc. etc. You can go to your favorite Twitter Truthers for all of that nonsense.

Just keep in mind that in the hours, days and weeks to come, you will hear more and more of the standard, status-quo, mainstream conspiracy theories. This should signal to you that there might be something else going on underneath all of this noise and that ALL of these misdirects are meant to confuse, distract and overwhelm you.

I would further argue that it’s a total waste of time and you’re better off looking at the bigger picture and trusting your intuition around the whole thing. Does it “feel” real to you? Or does it “feel” fake? I won’t tell you what you should think, only you can decide that for yourselves.

What I will do is show you one piece of evidence, which I consider a bit of a smoking gun and the reason I decided to write this short paper.

First, watch this video, taken from a bystander at the event. At the 20 second mark in the video, you will hear a lady scream:  “What the hell is THAAAT?”

When I first heard this, I immediately recalled an old 9/11 clip from an “amateur” video where a woman screams the exact same thing with the exact same tonal inflection.

I reached out to Simon Shack to see if he could help me track it down. The best he could do was point me to the timestamp in his September Clues film which contains a portion of this clip. In the film, Simon analyzes the voice in this clip and compares it to a woman’s voice in another 9/11 clip to determine if they are the same person. You can view that snippet here.

With that clue, I was able to remember that it was the now infamous and proven fraudulent “Tina Cart” video from 9/11 which you can review here.

Now, without going into a long diatribe about how awfully fake this video is, you should understand that it has long been thoroughly debunked 100 times over by multiple internet researchers and it has been proven to be a “clone” of other video clips that were used to create the fakery that day. In this instance, it was used by AP (and other media outlets) to help sell the fake 9/11 imagery.

Of course it includes the contrived “HOLY FUCK!” and cartoonish, over-acted “OH MY GAAAWWWD!” screams, accompanied by some fake “stomp stomp” sounds and nonsensical “waving of the arms,” in front of the camera, presumably to create some additional realism via “commotion” or something.

As I’m sure you’ll agree, it is an incredibly pathetic and obvious fake, and quite comical watching it back now, nearly 25 years later.

The good news is that I found what I was looking for and you can hear it at the 10 second mark of this stupid, fake 9/11 “amateur” video:

“What the hell is THAAAT?”

I already know that it’s not a smoking gun for you, and that’s okay.

It is for me.

I have cut the two audio clips and put them next to each other several times so you can compare. You can listen to them side-by-side below.

They always call back to 9/11. They have been putting their 9/11 signatures on all of their PsyOps for nearly 25 years now.

They just can’t help themselves.

UPDATE - THE 2ND SMOKING GUN

July 16th, 2024

The second smoking gun for this PsyOp can be found in this article that was published on July 1st, 2024 over at The Atlantic, which is an obvious intelligence propaganda rag, which was published just 12 days before “the shooting.”

Go ahead and have a look at Trump’s ear in the artwork they used for this trash article.

Then you can decide if this is all a matter of mere coincidence or if these folks are mocking you right to your face, with their standard predictive programming tactics.

I'd say that's enough to put the final nail in the proverbial coffin, even if we don't know all of the precise details of how this magic trick was pulled off.

At the very least, I’m sure you’ll agree that it’s quite “eery.” 🙂

Now, of course you are free to cling to certain aspects of this PsyOp that you believe must be real, such as real dead bodies (civilians and/or shooter). For me, it just doesn't make sense that all of these folks who were "in on it" would agree to playing a role in this operation if they knew that real people were going to die. What’s a few white lies if nobody’s getting hurt? A small price to pay to win the election and save our country, you see. 

It makes a lot more sense that they'd all agree because, again - what's the harm? Nobody will get hurt and there won't be any guilt or blood on anyone's hands.

Next you will say - "Well what if they signed up thinking that, but then real bullets were used to kill real people and they didn't know that this was going to happen in advance?"

Again, you are free to cling to that theory if you like.

For me, it makes much more sense to keep it simple and use fake props and gore/blood. Why introduce so many new variables by actually killing people and then running the risk of 'actors' talking in the future?  What if the gun jammed?  What if the bullet missed? What if the killshot hit the guy's shoulder instead and he survived? Then you’d have a huge problem on your hands.

Why introduce so many additional and unnecessary variables? Just fake it. It's a lot easier and cleaner and nobody gets hurt.

At the very least, I think we've seen enough to know that the Trump portion of this operation is bullshit.

Darkside Papers Telegram Channel
See Also Miles Mathis Paper on this event

---

From Petra:
It was “predicted” back in 1995 with the Illuminati: New World Order card game on a card Enough is Enough, showing a man's face resembling Trump's with what might be interpreted as a bullet whizzing past. The words on the card read:

“At any time, at any place, our snipers can drop you. Have a nice day.”

This article written in 2015 alludes to this prediction.
https://allnewspipeline.com/Illuminati_Card_Game_Hints_Assassination_Attempt.php