9/11 and Pearl Harbor: it's a bird ...
9/11 and Pearl Harbor: it's a bird ...
My feeling when learning of a lie about which I’ve been completely clueless is quite different from awakening to a deeper layer of a lie which I thought I understood. When it’s the deeper layer I feel the same sense of delight as when a magician fools you with a magic trick. “Oh my goodness, I studied that, how on earth … ?”
In 2018, after waking up up to 9/11 not being a false flag per se but - in reality - a massive demolition job cum Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise where the death and injury were faked, I investigated other events said to be false flags, including Pearl Harbor, and realised that the death and injury were staged in those events too. However, it is only in the last week, six years later, that it finally hit me: just as there were no passenger airliner crashes on 9/11, no bombs were dropped from planes at Pearl Harbor. It wasn’t simply that the US performed an evacuated bombing blaming it on the Japanese - while some of the footage of bombing is completely faked using models, there is no clear evidence of any aerial bombing at all while the evidence clearly shows submerged explosives and strong indications otherwise of non-aerial bombing. We see quite a lot of footage of planes … but no bombs being dropped and hitting target. Just like the later event, they really wanted us to believe in planes but real planes wouldn’t have done the job they wanted at all in the case of 9/11 while at Pearl Harbor much better control with non-aerial bombing, no? … and we might wonder exactly how much damage - by whatever means - was really done - see item at the end.
For neither 9/11 nor Pearl Harbor was there any desire for planes to perform the action wanted, it was only our belief in them … and when it’s only our belief then they fake it. A basic psyop rule: what is wanted is done for real, the rest is faked because it all works better that way - it’s generally more practicable and maximising dupery is the name of the game, not minimising it.
As is their Revelation of the Method way, they tell us loud and clear: “We’re showing you planes to make you think bombs were dropped … but we’re not showing you any bombs actually hitting target from the air and we’re clearly showing you submerged explosives.”
It is only when you wake up to a further level of dupery that you can really appreciate viscerally the true magic of propaganda. The Monkey Business Illusion video might demonstrate admirably how we see things according to our focus but it’s not the same as experiencing an awakening to a deeper level of dupery in a work of propaganda you believe you have understood.
Take a look.
Plane footage (10m) - looks like an air show and not a single bomb dropped. As pointed out in the comments by
, at 09:31 a clapboard shows the date April 2, 1943. What says the footage is taken at the time of the attack and what sort of confidence should we have in other footage?At 00:49 we see blurry footage of what looks like planes dropping bombs but the footage is cut between their dropping and the explosions we see so there is no clear evidence of the bombs (if that’s what they are) being dropped on Pearl Harbour.
We’re told that Pearl Harbor was attacked by 350 Japanese aircraft but at 2:00 we see USS Arizona explode with no plane in sight and the nature of the explosion is perfectly consistent with explosives set off from on board or in the vicinity. Is the anticipation indicated by the seeming synchronisation of the bombing and the appearance of a pointing finger one of their Revelation of the Method signs … or just a coincidence?
At 00:34 submerged explosive followed by planes not dropping bombs and then again we see USS Arizona with the synchronised finger at 1:56 (screenshot below).
Analysis of the Pearl Harbor psyop (9m)
Jason Laufenberg of Awake Souls and Ronnie Harris of the Limitless Channel
So with all this bombing - from whatever source - how much damage was there?
According to ChatGPT:
Of the eight battleships impacted during the attack only the USS Arizona was not salvaged at all - but guess what? - it’s used for memorial purposes (rather hilariously, the most frequent visitors to the Pearl Harbor memorial sites are Japanese). Of the remaining seven, six were returned to service (four within the same year) while the USS Oklahoma was sold for scrap.
Of the nine other ships impacted, the USS Utah was not salvaged but remains as a “war grave”. Of the remaining eight: five returned to service within the same year; two - after salvage of their machinery and equipment - were rebuilt and returned to service in 1943 while a fourth returned to service in 1944.
It’s difficult not to infer that the USS Arizona and the USS Utah were ready for the scrapheap but instead of simply trashing them, it was decided to put them to good use as relics for Pearl Harbour memorial sites which will be spinning money for who knows how long? … while the other ships returned to service suffered some “experimental” impact perhaps, if any.
“Pearl Harbor” the event shows no evidence of being less of a movie than any movie made about it. Even in movies they destroy stuff for real.
Your right, Petra, it's all funny business...
So, I was married to a Hawaiian girl and lived there, Honolulu for many years, my x mother-in-law said she remembered that the bombing of pearl harbor was not a surprise as all the media kept saying it was, she said they were warned well in advance to move up mountain, and take cover.
And the perl harbor memorial is a huge cash cow, primarily visited by Japanese tourists. Go figure.
They love to memorializes stuff don't they.
It's like a calling card for the funny business...😎
Great compilation Petra, on the top vid at 9:30 the clapboard says 1943, what to you make of that?