My feeling when learning of a lie about which I’ve been completely clueless is quite different from awakening to a deeper layer of a lie which I thought I understood.
Didn't notice that. So prior to the clapboard we see a plane with a star on it - what plane is that as the Japanese planes sported a red sun (or so we're told)? - and we see a wisp of smoke off to the right. After the clapboard we see a plane blazing a great trail of smoke behind it in which we can see a match with the prior wisp of smoke.
I think it's just reinforcing that it's all make-believe :)
The wrong date to me makes the dates of all the footage on that and other vids open to question. Footage in '43 doesn't help the immediate psyop done in '41.
Whatever footage there is, PM, if there's none showing clear evidence of bombs from planes hitting targets at Pearl Harbor (and I think they are quite scrupulous in ensuring they don't show that Revelation of the Method-style) we have no reason to believe in aerial bombing at Pearl Harbor.
Bottom line:
1. They only wanted us to believe in aerial bombing
2. We don't see clear evidence of bombs from planes hitting targets at Pearl Harbor
3. We see clear evidence of submerged explosives
4. Non-aerial bombing is much easier to control than aerial bombing and if you're wanting to destroy your own infrastructure then in the case of Pearl Harbor, non-aerial bombing would be the bombing type of choice wouldn't you say?
There's masses of fakery involved just as there is for 9/11 - in both cases they're movies where some pieces of footage are shot on the day and others at other times. I wouldn't be overly concerned about what's real, what's not, what was shot on the day and what wasn't. We know there were building destructions on 9/11 using controlled demolition and we know they destroyed stuff at Pearl Harbor with explosives ... in the case of Pearl Harbor it's not really important whether they used planes or not except from the psyop point of view that they had us all fooled that they used planes (including those of us who recognised the staged death and injury) when there is not a single piece of clear evidence that they did use planes for bombing nor any good reason to favour aerial bombing over non-aerial bombing.
Lets also not forget that the pacific fleet was moved from Long Beach to Oahu/Pearl....and one has to wonder why was that done?
You go from being protected by the mainland to being in one of the most remote places in this world completely unprotected.
Imagine if you will the Japanese attempting to attack Long Beach. That would be impossible, the Fleet would have been sunk with nary a US casualty had such a Japanese fleet actually sailed to the mainland USA to attack. Thus it makes zero sense to put the pacific fleet that far out in the middle of no where, but it makes sense if you want to pull off a big scam without prying eyes.
Have you ever heard the story of Leslie Grogan Radioman on the S.S. Lurline. It is said that he plotted the Japanese fleet sailing south east towards Hawaii.
There was supposedly documentation of this, however it is missing from archives, what is not missing is the written entry into the archives logbook....maybe someone forgot to tear the page out of the log book when they removed Grogan's documentation before the early 90's when much of it was due to became declassified.....just my opinion on that one.
Both the US AND Japan did a movie during WW2 about this "attack"..There is even a photo showing the moddell of PH the Japanese filmamkers used. Those 2 get mixed up a lot. But it also says "OSS" which was the forerunner to CIA iirc. Also note that the smoke is way to think and big in the footage/photos. You may also identify a face in the smoke like at 9/11 :P Modells of ships were used, this was already quite widely used in film in the 30s and 40s (later ofc cgi and greenscreen would be used more)
Good work! I had been questioning that (and the "atomic bombs") and other aspects of what We have been told already, but You lay it out in a way that makes it clear how They duped the public, and how the lies unfolded! Thank You!!!
It's really not that complicated though, is it? It's just the magic of propaganda that has us fooled. I watched a PH video awhile ago now and I noticed a comment pointing out that the explosives were submerged and the video itself pointed out the use of models ... but it still took quite awhile to twig to no aerial bombing at all. I cannot help being amused by their ruses ... the thing is though that while the ruse itself might be funny, the agenda absolutely isn't.
Indeed, the agenda absolutely isn't!!! Thus I keep working to solve for Those who create this mess of BS for Us. We would best do things personally so that aggregately We win.
Most likely, all the essential video (and audio) material broadcast that morning as central to the media presentation was prepared well in advance by Pentagon psyops specialists with assistance from Hollywood or Israeli movie consultants. After all, the Israelis have been using the "rocket attack" narrative to explain away controlled demolitions, for decades now. They're experts at this kind of deception.
They may have taken additional footage on that day and the days immediately following; then integrated that footage to enhance the visual details of SUBSEQUENT reporting. They control the cameras; they control the TV networks, they can manage the media narrative any way they choose.
What's real and what's fake in the twin tower demolitions is a mystery to me, however, I'm sure there's a way of working it out. I've always focused on WTC-7 and never really worried about the twin towers because I thought WTC-7's demolition is the "cleanest" so to speak and as Graeme MacQueen said, "There is no room in the official story for controlled demolition," there is simply no need to prove all three. But with people latching onto the other propaganda streams for how the buildings came down it would be good to work out what's what.
Bottom line though: death and injury staged meaning 9/11 was just a big drill cum demolition job.
When you look into the attack of the USS Liberty in June, 1967 which was a failed attempt by Israel to bring America into the Sis Day War, it makes you question everything. There is a never ending war going on and it’s against US!
Indeed, it truly is a play, with scrips written, actors cast, and directed from the wings by the psychopaths in control, with live props and participatory audience.
We might best do all We can to be freed from Their rule.
The attack was definitely staged just like so many other false flag attacks that stain our history of never ending war. While no one has ever blown the whistle on exactly why Israel attempted to destroy a US Navy surveillance ship and kill the entire crew, it certainly appears that blame was going towards Egypt bringing US into the conflict. Fortunately the mission was halted before completion and it led to a very inconvenient public relations dilemma that LBJ with mainstream media help was able to bury. But the survivors and victim’s families have never forgotten.
Yes faked, with help of the British ofc to ensure the commies (China and Russia) won the war.. Japan was wiping the floor w/ the Chinese they had to be stopped
"she said they were warned well in advance to move up mountain, and take cover." Funny that is the same a Japanese grandma told when asked about the "atomic attack" cannot remember which city. But they went to a shelter in the mountain and did not see much of the "Nuke" at all :)
Great compilation Petra, on the top vid at 9:30 the clapboard says 1943, what to you make of that?
Didn't notice that. So prior to the clapboard we see a plane with a star on it - what plane is that as the Japanese planes sported a red sun (or so we're told)? - and we see a wisp of smoke off to the right. After the clapboard we see a plane blazing a great trail of smoke behind it in which we can see a match with the prior wisp of smoke.
I think it's just reinforcing that it's all make-believe :)
The wrong date to me makes the dates of all the footage on that and other vids open to question. Footage in '43 doesn't help the immediate psyop done in '41.
Whatever footage there is, PM, if there's none showing clear evidence of bombs from planes hitting targets at Pearl Harbor (and I think they are quite scrupulous in ensuring they don't show that Revelation of the Method-style) we have no reason to believe in aerial bombing at Pearl Harbor.
Bottom line:
1. They only wanted us to believe in aerial bombing
2. We don't see clear evidence of bombs from planes hitting targets at Pearl Harbor
3. We see clear evidence of submerged explosives
4. Non-aerial bombing is much easier to control than aerial bombing and if you're wanting to destroy your own infrastructure then in the case of Pearl Harbor, non-aerial bombing would be the bombing type of choice wouldn't you say?
Agreed, still we dont have and good proof of filming dates for some of those vids, the 1943 one is clearly not fitting.
There's masses of fakery involved just as there is for 9/11 - in both cases they're movies where some pieces of footage are shot on the day and others at other times. I wouldn't be overly concerned about what's real, what's not, what was shot on the day and what wasn't. We know there were building destructions on 9/11 using controlled demolition and we know they destroyed stuff at Pearl Harbor with explosives ... in the case of Pearl Harbor it's not really important whether they used planes or not except from the psyop point of view that they had us all fooled that they used planes (including those of us who recognised the staged death and injury) when there is not a single piece of clear evidence that they did use planes for bombing nor any good reason to favour aerial bombing over non-aerial bombing.
Do "WE" really know it was controlled demolition.
I personally have not amassed enough information in the past 23 years to allow myself to conclude there was a "Controlled Demolition"
Lets also not forget that the pacific fleet was moved from Long Beach to Oahu/Pearl....and one has to wonder why was that done?
You go from being protected by the mainland to being in one of the most remote places in this world completely unprotected.
Imagine if you will the Japanese attempting to attack Long Beach. That would be impossible, the Fleet would have been sunk with nary a US casualty had such a Japanese fleet actually sailed to the mainland USA to attack. Thus it makes zero sense to put the pacific fleet that far out in the middle of no where, but it makes sense if you want to pull off a big scam without prying eyes.
Have you ever heard the story of Leslie Grogan Radioman on the S.S. Lurline. It is said that he plotted the Japanese fleet sailing south east towards Hawaii.
https://www.cnrs-scrn.org/northern_mariner/vol11/nm_11_2_1to17.pdf
There was supposedly documentation of this, however it is missing from archives, what is not missing is the written entry into the archives logbook....maybe someone forgot to tear the page out of the log book when they removed Grogan's documentation before the early 90's when much of it was due to became declassified.....just my opinion on that one.
Maybe it was the torpedo planes & the midget subs.
Ask these kooks what they think:
"Things you didn't know about the attack on Pearl Harbor | Full Documentary" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJbNhqKXguw&t=4226s
Both the US AND Japan did a movie during WW2 about this "attack"..There is even a photo showing the moddell of PH the Japanese filmamkers used. Those 2 get mixed up a lot. But it also says "OSS" which was the forerunner to CIA iirc. Also note that the smoke is way to think and big in the footage/photos. You may also identify a face in the smoke like at 9/11 :P Modells of ships were used, this was already quite widely used in film in the 30s and 40s (later ofc cgi and greenscreen would be used more)
Decades of Lies 😫
... stretching into centuries ... stretching ...
Good work! I had been questioning that (and the "atomic bombs") and other aspects of what We have been told already, but You lay it out in a way that makes it clear how They duped the public, and how the lies unfolded! Thank You!!!
It's really not that complicated though, is it? It's just the magic of propaganda that has us fooled. I watched a PH video awhile ago now and I noticed a comment pointing out that the explosives were submerged and the video itself pointed out the use of models ... but it still took quite awhile to twig to no aerial bombing at all. I cannot help being amused by their ruses ... the thing is though that while the ruse itself might be funny, the agenda absolutely isn't.
Indeed, the agenda absolutely isn't!!! Thus I keep working to solve for Those who create this mess of BS for Us. We would best do things personally so that aggregately We win.
The GentleOne’s Solution (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-gentleones-solution
Like your Cloak & magnifying 🔍 glass
Me too - I wish it was actually me but it's a model wearing a Halloween costume.
Most likely, all the essential video (and audio) material broadcast that morning as central to the media presentation was prepared well in advance by Pentagon psyops specialists with assistance from Hollywood or Israeli movie consultants. After all, the Israelis have been using the "rocket attack" narrative to explain away controlled demolitions, for decades now. They're experts at this kind of deception.
They may have taken additional footage on that day and the days immediately following; then integrated that footage to enhance the visual details of SUBSEQUENT reporting. They control the cameras; they control the TV networks, they can manage the media narrative any way they choose.
I think your speculations have merit, Lynn.
What's real and what's fake in the twin tower demolitions is a mystery to me, however, I'm sure there's a way of working it out. I've always focused on WTC-7 and never really worried about the twin towers because I thought WTC-7's demolition is the "cleanest" so to speak and as Graeme MacQueen said, "There is no room in the official story for controlled demolition," there is simply no need to prove all three. But with people latching onto the other propaganda streams for how the buildings came down it would be good to work out what's what.
Bottom line though: death and injury staged meaning 9/11 was just a big drill cum demolition job.
There were also many drills prior to the bombing.
And big Hollywood directors involved in the Pacific War.
Yep, drills and Hollywood.
https://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2416343&hilit=pearl+harbor#p2416343
Thanks for that. Very interesting. Yes, the very familiar many drills theme.
When you look into the attack of the USS Liberty in June, 1967 which was a failed attempt by Israel to bring America into the Sis Day War, it makes you question everything. There is a never ending war going on and it’s against US!
But the evidence shows that was staged: https://petraliverani.substack.com/i/145565666/uss-liberty-attack-by-israel-june. Come on, Israel attack BFF USA for real?
Indeed, it truly is a play, with scrips written, actors cast, and directed from the wings by the psychopaths in control, with live props and participatory audience.
We might best do all We can to be freed from Their rule.
Money Motivates the Most Marvelous Manifestations! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-motivates-the-most-marvelous
The attack was definitely staged just like so many other false flag attacks that stain our history of never ending war. While no one has ever blown the whistle on exactly why Israel attempted to destroy a US Navy surveillance ship and kill the entire crew, it certainly appears that blame was going towards Egypt bringing US into the conflict. Fortunately the mission was halted before completion and it led to a very inconvenient public relations dilemma that LBJ with mainstream media help was able to bury. But the survivors and victim’s families have never forgotten.
No. The attack was not staged at all - all fake. Did you read my post? The survivor stories make no sense.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/i/145565666/uss-liberty-attack-by-israel-june
We have similar kind if nonsense in the 9/11 firefighter "oral" histories.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/nonsensicalities-in-the-911-firefighter
Japanese Secret Weapon
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uRYQY3QlPuA?feature=share
Fightingmonarch
Climateviewer.com real science
Pulse weaponary
Hey Petra 😘😲
Looks like another inside job, as they say.
Yes faked, with help of the British ofc to ensure the commies (China and Russia) won the war.. Japan was wiping the floor w/ the Chinese they had to be stopped
Mysqif.com
lol
That is so hilarious! Primarily visited by Japanese tourists!
Yes, they love to memorialise stuff cos it's such a great way of making money and keeping people fooled.
"she said they were warned well in advance to move up mountain, and take cover." Funny that is the same a Japanese grandma told when asked about the "atomic attack" cannot remember which city. But they went to a shelter in the mountain and did not see much of the "Nuke" at all :)