And they even staged a trial with a blubbering Alex Jones receiving a crazy amount financial penalty for asking questions about Sandy Hook. He played his part there too scare everyone else from officially questioning any staged theatrical tragedy.
Very thoughtful and well presented piece! Miles Mathis causes me no end of bother in my mind though - his pieces are a maddening mixture of common sense and weirdness and his site just does not say "convincing" does it? However, I have actually talked to him - he suspected me of being an agent because of the people I'd managed to speak with through doing a biography of a guy who knew just about everybody in 60s London :-) We also talked about Paul McCartney and he was adamant Sir Paul is the very same guy, but he did offer to put one of my articles up on his site if I could convince him otherwise! I was impressed by his Lennon piece. When I spoke later to Peter McNamee, the director of Let Him Be, he (obviously) told me the film was entirely fictional (speaking in a very Lennon-esque voice on the phone) It is so very hard to sift through stuff:-/
Excellent article - you've laid out all these logical points in good order!
As you're aware from all our little comments on Iain's article about Manchester all these aspects have been in my contemplation recently. I like the way these things kind of 'digest' inside us and then get ordered and written out.
I'll probably have to go and think about all this even more but for an initial reaction I was thinking the following, mainly related to your point about 'they don't care about human life'.
I think one way of thinking about it is a kind of game theory approach, namely, 'think from your opponent's point of view'. In this case, I am minded to simply visualise their 'planning meeting'. In such a meeting they will have an 'objective' - let's say it's 'do terrorist attack'. And as you say, a psyop is actually about creating a publicly-consumed narrative, not necessarily about actually setting off a bomb (if we're using Manchester as our example). So, the approach they will take will simply be 'what is the most efficient way of achieving our objective?'. The point about them 'not caring about human life' is important here - if they decide that the most efficient way really is to just set off a bomb then that's what they'll do. Of course, if it's more about 'narrative control' then they will think a little differently about it, and will not want to 'overcomplicate' things and absolutely try and minimise, or eliminate entirely, the 'random' element. Thus, for example, in order to 'get the narrative message across', yes, they will need to have 'actors' involved, because otherwise they simply can't control what 'statements' the (genuine) victims will make. They also can't rule out the possibility that one or more of the victims might be 'someone important' or 'someone with important connections' - and that, especially, is a very, very important note there.
So, I think we should bear this in mind vis a vis the hypothesis of 'hybrid' events - i.e. 'a real attack' combined with 'actors involved in a psyop'. If their planning meeting decides that a hybrid is the most efficient way to achieve the objective, then that's what they'll do. If 'only actors' is most efficient, they'll do that. And if 'just setting off a bomb' is most efficient, then they'll choose that option.
Anyhow, you're laying down of all this logical analysis is excellent! Great article!
Good job Petra, this is a very fascinating and niche topic for people in this space! I hope you will continue with more details, how they fake the deaths, proof of persons still living etc. I had posts on Sharon Tate, JFK, and Abe the Japan PM, all shocked me the deeper I got.
I have a particular interest in the "Lets Roll" guys of UA 93, Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, and Jeremy Glick. Besides the fact that there was no plane at the crash site, do you have any specific info on any of these guys still being alive?
A quick, concise article that's always a pleasure to read.
Unfortunately, the majority of conspiracy theorists continue to react in the same way as the majority of people when they are told about unofficial accounts.
With all the evidence over the years, there has been little change. I saw it again with the alleged attack of 22 March near Moscow.
I came across videos in French that demonstrated the Russians' implacable complicity. It's yet another hoax, but in Europe we can't even suggest it, as our comments will be immediately deleted for "incitement to hatred" and "negationism".
I can vouch for Judi Bari being wounded in Oakland , as I visited her in hospital, and witnessed her injuries...(though I can't speak directly as to whether or not it was by a pipe bomb blast, or if she was an agent of sorts)
Sometime in the mid-teens, a Sandy Hook "mother" came to our very large suburban Phila. school district, with all district faculty in the h.s. auditorium. She gave a tear-filled Powerpoint presentation, lots of slides, lots of emoting. So what were we teachers supposed to do with this "information"? Bear in mind that by 2018, my "progressive" asst. principal was considering the idea of armed faculty.
It's not about mind control. In our worldly condition we are already mind-controlled. It's about spiritual accusation.
Our prideful self-centeredness is exposed by these fearful delusions, for the purpose of eventually producing conviction, contrition, and repentance. Or for NOT producing it, as the individual case may be.
Any narratives that scare us or tempt us are instruments of this process. Our blind worldliness will be thoroughly demonstrated for many years, but then at some later moment the humbling extent of our former blindness will be revealed to us.
We're not figuring anything out by our own clever insight. We're being shown.
Isaiah 66:4
4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.
2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Timothy 1:7
7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
Ecclesiasticus (Book of Sirach) 3:23-26
23 Be not curious in unnecessary matters: for more things are shewed unto thee than men understand.
24 For many are deceived by their own vain opinion; and an evil suspicion hath overthrown their judgment.
25 Without eyes thou shalt want light: profess not the knowledge therefore that thou hast not.
26 A stubborn heart shall fare evil at the last; and he that loveth danger shall perish therein.
like V for vendetta, in the end, no one was killed (the masks come off)
Although the traumatization would not be well received....and to what reason, to contro( intention of psyops) is deceitful tyranny all the same.The plot thickens.....
I pray and hope this is the case, I do like happy endings.👍
Petra, I tried to send you an email a week ago or so and it bounced. There was some stuff I wanted to bring to your attention. I assume you have my email address. Could you drop me a note?
You have to answer a question i have. What did they do with all of yhe firefighters that supposedly died that day, if they didnt actually die like you think. Each double house has about 50 reg firemen and 8 bosses. Some firehouses lost multiple guys that day. Eng54L4 lost 15 men. Those fifteen men were people that worked among other firefighters for years. They were good friends of other firemen. If their deaths were faked on 9/11–where did they go? Did they get put in witness protection?
A firehouse losing a bunch of men has to either have actually happened, or all 60 men who worked there had to be in on it.
Like i said before a lot of this shit is faked. Things like the Boston Marathon were for sure fugazy, but 9/11 being a drill is something that i will have a tough time being convinced of. I think they blew up the buildings with people in it.
Of course it was, sorry! That first pic is one that has been touched up so many times... I've got (what I take to be) the original in Mike McCartney's book - he took that pic, along with many other less than beautiful shots of his brother :-). The second is from the very strange Nigerian trip with Denny (sadly recently departed) where SO much weird stuff happened and a lot of songs etc were allegedly stolen from Bill and the band. The guy whose biography I wrote did a video of Wings doing Band on the Run. The McCartney MS has been sitting in my drawer for way too long. I must go back to it!
EVERYONE always remember - this WHOLE HOUSE OF LIES/CARDS cannot be untangled by men's mind. The ONLY EXIT from the madhouse is THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ONLY AND THE HOLY SPIRIT!
Great article and i know that lots of these things are faked. Maybe you could help answer a few questions i have.
I was working on maiden lane on 9/11 and from the office i worked in i saw with my own eyes people jumping to their deaths. Where those dummies?
Also i became a NYC firefighter in 2004 and heard stories about guys that the people i worked with knew and who had died that day. Are they all in on it or did they just put the firemen who died in like a witness protection program?
My very close friend actually made s rescue that day. The rescue was made into a documentary on the discovery channel. Its called 9/11 surfer. I know my friend is a real firefighter and not some crisis actor. What do you think the explanation for that is?
And they even staged a trial with a blubbering Alex Jones receiving a crazy amount financial penalty for asking questions about Sandy Hook. He played his part there too scare everyone else from officially questioning any staged theatrical tragedy.
Very thoughtful and well presented piece! Miles Mathis causes me no end of bother in my mind though - his pieces are a maddening mixture of common sense and weirdness and his site just does not say "convincing" does it? However, I have actually talked to him - he suspected me of being an agent because of the people I'd managed to speak with through doing a biography of a guy who knew just about everybody in 60s London :-) We also talked about Paul McCartney and he was adamant Sir Paul is the very same guy, but he did offer to put one of my articles up on his site if I could convince him otherwise! I was impressed by his Lennon piece. When I spoke later to Peter McNamee, the director of Let Him Be, he (obviously) told me the film was entirely fictional (speaking in a very Lennon-esque voice on the phone) It is so very hard to sift through stuff:-/
Excellent article - you've laid out all these logical points in good order!
As you're aware from all our little comments on Iain's article about Manchester all these aspects have been in my contemplation recently. I like the way these things kind of 'digest' inside us and then get ordered and written out.
I'll probably have to go and think about all this even more but for an initial reaction I was thinking the following, mainly related to your point about 'they don't care about human life'.
I think one way of thinking about it is a kind of game theory approach, namely, 'think from your opponent's point of view'. In this case, I am minded to simply visualise their 'planning meeting'. In such a meeting they will have an 'objective' - let's say it's 'do terrorist attack'. And as you say, a psyop is actually about creating a publicly-consumed narrative, not necessarily about actually setting off a bomb (if we're using Manchester as our example). So, the approach they will take will simply be 'what is the most efficient way of achieving our objective?'. The point about them 'not caring about human life' is important here - if they decide that the most efficient way really is to just set off a bomb then that's what they'll do. Of course, if it's more about 'narrative control' then they will think a little differently about it, and will not want to 'overcomplicate' things and absolutely try and minimise, or eliminate entirely, the 'random' element. Thus, for example, in order to 'get the narrative message across', yes, they will need to have 'actors' involved, because otherwise they simply can't control what 'statements' the (genuine) victims will make. They also can't rule out the possibility that one or more of the victims might be 'someone important' or 'someone with important connections' - and that, especially, is a very, very important note there.
So, I think we should bear this in mind vis a vis the hypothesis of 'hybrid' events - i.e. 'a real attack' combined with 'actors involved in a psyop'. If their planning meeting decides that a hybrid is the most efficient way to achieve the objective, then that's what they'll do. If 'only actors' is most efficient, they'll do that. And if 'just setting off a bomb' is most efficient, then they'll choose that option.
Anyhow, you're laying down of all this logical analysis is excellent! Great article!
Good job Petra, this is a very fascinating and niche topic for people in this space! I hope you will continue with more details, how they fake the deaths, proof of persons still living etc. I had posts on Sharon Tate, JFK, and Abe the Japan PM, all shocked me the deeper I got.
I have a particular interest in the "Lets Roll" guys of UA 93, Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, and Jeremy Glick. Besides the fact that there was no plane at the crash site, do you have any specific info on any of these guys still being alive?
A quick, concise article that's always a pleasure to read.
Unfortunately, the majority of conspiracy theorists continue to react in the same way as the majority of people when they are told about unofficial accounts.
With all the evidence over the years, there has been little change. I saw it again with the alleged attack of 22 March near Moscow.
I came across videos in French that demonstrated the Russians' implacable complicity. It's yet another hoax, but in Europe we can't even suggest it, as our comments will be immediately deleted for "incitement to hatred" and "negationism".
I can vouch for Judi Bari being wounded in Oakland , as I visited her in hospital, and witnessed her injuries...(though I can't speak directly as to whether or not it was by a pipe bomb blast, or if she was an agent of sorts)
Sometime in the mid-teens, a Sandy Hook "mother" came to our very large suburban Phila. school district, with all district faculty in the h.s. auditorium. She gave a tear-filled Powerpoint presentation, lots of slides, lots of emoting. So what were we teachers supposed to do with this "information"? Bear in mind that by 2018, my "progressive" asst. principal was considering the idea of armed faculty.
It's not about mind control. In our worldly condition we are already mind-controlled. It's about spiritual accusation.
Our prideful self-centeredness is exposed by these fearful delusions, for the purpose of eventually producing conviction, contrition, and repentance. Or for NOT producing it, as the individual case may be.
Any narratives that scare us or tempt us are instruments of this process. Our blind worldliness will be thoroughly demonstrated for many years, but then at some later moment the humbling extent of our former blindness will be revealed to us.
We're not figuring anything out by our own clever insight. We're being shown.
Isaiah 66:4
4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.
2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Timothy 1:7
7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
Ecclesiasticus (Book of Sirach) 3:23-26
23 Be not curious in unnecessary matters: for more things are shewed unto thee than men understand.
24 For many are deceived by their own vain opinion; and an evil suspicion hath overthrown their judgment.
25 Without eyes thou shalt want light: profess not the knowledge therefore that thou hast not.
26 A stubborn heart shall fare evil at the last; and he that loveth danger shall perish therein.
Yes. The death clingers and corpse clutchers are assisting the MSM lies by agreeing with body counts without first insisting upon evidence.
#AUTOHOAX
Very interesting article,
like V for vendetta, in the end, no one was killed (the masks come off)
Although the traumatization would not be well received....and to what reason, to contro( intention of psyops) is deceitful tyranny all the same.The plot thickens.....
I pray and hope this is the case, I do like happy endings.👍
On a video with regards to the 322 Russia show, I posted 'As many people died here as when they shot TenneT in this location.'
I got many insults and few likes :)
Petra, I tried to send you an email a week ago or so and it bounced. There was some stuff I wanted to bring to your attention. I assume you have my email address. Could you drop me a note?
You have to answer a question i have. What did they do with all of yhe firefighters that supposedly died that day, if they didnt actually die like you think. Each double house has about 50 reg firemen and 8 bosses. Some firehouses lost multiple guys that day. Eng54L4 lost 15 men. Those fifteen men were people that worked among other firefighters for years. They were good friends of other firemen. If their deaths were faked on 9/11–where did they go? Did they get put in witness protection?
A firehouse losing a bunch of men has to either have actually happened, or all 60 men who worked there had to be in on it.
Like i said before a lot of this shit is faked. Things like the Boston Marathon were for sure fugazy, but 9/11 being a drill is something that i will have a tough time being convinced of. I think they blew up the buildings with people in it.
Of course it was, sorry! That first pic is one that has been touched up so many times... I've got (what I take to be) the original in Mike McCartney's book - he took that pic, along with many other less than beautiful shots of his brother :-). The second is from the very strange Nigerian trip with Denny (sadly recently departed) where SO much weird stuff happened and a lot of songs etc were allegedly stolen from Bill and the band. The guy whose biography I wrote did a video of Wings doing Band on the Run. The McCartney MS has been sitting in my drawer for way too long. I must go back to it!
Here is another lead:
https://www.savethemales.ca/001487.html
EVERYONE always remember - this WHOLE HOUSE OF LIES/CARDS cannot be untangled by men's mind. The ONLY EXIT from the madhouse is THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ONLY AND THE HOLY SPIRIT!
Great article and i know that lots of these things are faked. Maybe you could help answer a few questions i have.
I was working on maiden lane on 9/11 and from the office i worked in i saw with my own eyes people jumping to their deaths. Where those dummies?
Also i became a NYC firefighter in 2004 and heard stories about guys that the people i worked with knew and who had died that day. Are they all in on it or did they just put the firemen who died in like a witness protection program?
My very close friend actually made s rescue that day. The rescue was made into a documentary on the discovery channel. Its called 9/11 surfer. I know my friend is a real firefighter and not some crisis actor. What do you think the explanation for that is?
Thanks for your answers in advance.