Celia Farber published the post, New York, with a 15m video of candid footage from one person and probably because I clicked that footage, another video with candid footage (as far as I can tell) popped up on my YouTube feed - a 55m video comprising a number of snippets.
Hmmm which does make it slightly suspect perhaps but I think it's genuine. I guess they wouldn't be keeping the camera fixed on Tower 2 waiting for it to explode.
"I guess they wouldn't be keeping the camera fixed on Tower 2 waiting for it to explode."
Maybe, but we still could've had footage of, at least, one of the buildings being hit by a plane. The fact that there's two instances where we see neither shown is odd, to say the least.
Had the explosions been caused by planes crashing into the Towers, I'd imagine they would try to capture those moments, too. Such things aren't something you see everyday, so there was no reason to not film those scenes. The fact we don't see that implies nothing of the sort had actually happened, besides the Towers exploding from within due to rigged explosives detonating.
No doubt. Whatever caused the explosions it's certainly not the "planes" they showed us. I know someone who was there on the day and he said he saw a plane so who knows what was actually flying around if anything. Bottom line, the passenger airliners they told us crashed did not and what they showed us was CGI.
Oh, definitely. I couldn't agree more with the rest of what you said here.
Perhaps he may have saw a plane and mistaken it was one of the planes that allegedly struck the Twin Towers. Despite those incidents likely being faked, I'm sure there was still plenty of air traffic during that day, so he could've mistaken any similar-looking aircraft as being one of those. As he never explicitly mentioned seeing a plane crash and detonate inside one of the Towers, I think my scenario is a fair-given.
Well drills were being run that day, so a plane in the air is not out of the question.
Also the people that may have 'witnessed' the movie go home turn on "Strangers that TELL A VISION", view it over and over and over and over until that is what they come to know or deduce from all they have been told to beLIEve by the vision tellers.
One thing I am sure of is what the people are told occurred on 11 Sept 2001 did not, what fully happened I cannot entirely say how, but it is obvious why it happened when looking at all other such tumultuous events throughout time that keep the people agitated, divided, hating, killing each other none of which results in anything that could remotely be called 'mankind'. This is not happenstance it is clearly directed, manufactured, planned...etc....etc....and there is a beneficiary to all these crimes which is why horrors like this keep occurring.
I'm in the process of reading Dr. Judy Woods' remarkable book "Where Did the Towers Go?" She approaches the towers from the point of view of dissecting a crime scene without a pre-supposition as to methods used. Instead, she examines the forensic evidence available in the form of photos, eyewitness accounts, videos. Her conclusion is that Directed Energy Weapons were used and that the buildings were essentially vaporized with a technique using energy fields based on work by Nicola Tesla and a number of other scientists. This video actually corroborates Dr. Woods work. Watch the moment when the North Tower transforms into a cloud of dust. Use the 0.25x speed and 720 setting and you can see massive steel girders hurtling through the air, only to transform into dust clouds There is a 2 hour video available on one of the channels with Dr. Woods presenting the case. Not quite so thorough as the book, but a good start. Her evidence rules out 1) NIST pancake theory 2)controlled demolition 3)thermite 4) nuclear, leaving DEW as the probable method of destruction. The book was written in 2010. Events in Lahaina in August, 2023 corroborate use of DEW.
I'd imagine they said the same during the Pearl Harbor fake. And it's convenient how 9/11 was framed as "the new Pearl Harbor" by the psychopaths in some of their literature.
Oh yes, when I recognised that death and injury were staged in 9/11, I wondered about Pearl Harbour, the post-9/11 anthrax attacks and the 1980 Bologna station bombing ... and found them all to be completely staged not "false flags" per se. And then realised that while 9/11 was indeed the "new Pearl Harbour" as stated in the PNAC document, the similarity wasn't exactly as people inferred and the perps were having a little laugh over that one.
Yes, she is a good journalist but there are those critical of her on the AIDS story. Unfortunately, I think Celia suffers from loyalty to people and she maintained loyalty to people who were only arguing that HIV wasn't proven to cause AIDS while certain scientists, notably the Perth Group, argued that HIV itself had never been proven to exist and I think the Perth Group are right but, unfortunately, they were screwed over by certain people.
I watched the second plane strike the towers the point of view from these kids would miss it considering. Of course they are trying to make sense of what happened - everybody was. - and reality made the least amount of sense because nobody initially thought it was an on purpose terrorist attack.
The previous bombing attempt on the WTC taught terrorist groups a plethora of information and they used that info to devise a plan B, and it was much more efficient on many levels.
When you say you watched the second plane strike the towers do you mean on TV or in person?
This short video compares the plane-into-tower crash shown in the 1978 film, The Medusa Touch vs the alleged Flight 175 crash and comments on how it obeys crash physics better:
Medusa Touch / Flight 175
1. Deceleration / No deceleration
2. Damage to both plane and building / No damage to plane or building, plane just melts in
3. Fuel ignites immediately at entry point / delay of fuel ignition and not at entry point
4. Debris is ejected and falls to the ground / no debris
In this compilation video of 60 references made to 9/11 prior, we see a snippet of the first episode of the series, The Lone Gunmen, entitled Pilot where a plane's control is overridden to fly into a twin tower, released in March 2001 although the snippet (where video is bookmarked) stops at the point of impact. Can't get more brazen than that with your Predictive Programming, can you?
Suuuureee, Neely. That, or it was a scripted inside job planned decades in advance, which makes far more sense to me. Otherwise, how can you explain why America's national security apparatus simultaneously failed to stop this from happening when they had the chance?
BTW, the '93 WTC bombings were faked, too. That whole event was staged by FBI & Intel to heighten people's fears for phony Islamic terrorists - terrorists which were also created by the same people. It's a fact that Osama Bin Laden worked with the CIA, and Al Qaeda was nothing more than their front. Same with ISIS.
Amazing how the camera is turned away (twice) right at the supposed moment of impact/explosion/detenation.
Hmmm which does make it slightly suspect perhaps but I think it's genuine. I guess they wouldn't be keeping the camera fixed on Tower 2 waiting for it to explode.
"I guess they wouldn't be keeping the camera fixed on Tower 2 waiting for it to explode."
Maybe, but we still could've had footage of, at least, one of the buildings being hit by a plane. The fact that there's two instances where we see neither shown is odd, to say the least.
Had the explosions been caused by planes crashing into the Towers, I'd imagine they would try to capture those moments, too. Such things aren't something you see everyday, so there was no reason to not film those scenes. The fact we don't see that implies nothing of the sort had actually happened, besides the Towers exploding from within due to rigged explosives detonating.
No doubt. Whatever caused the explosions it's certainly not the "planes" they showed us. I know someone who was there on the day and he said he saw a plane so who knows what was actually flying around if anything. Bottom line, the passenger airliners they told us crashed did not and what they showed us was CGI.
Oh, definitely. I couldn't agree more with the rest of what you said here.
Perhaps he may have saw a plane and mistaken it was one of the planes that allegedly struck the Twin Towers. Despite those incidents likely being faked, I'm sure there was still plenty of air traffic during that day, so he could've mistaken any similar-looking aircraft as being one of those. As he never explicitly mentioned seeing a plane crash and detonate inside one of the Towers, I think my scenario is a fair-given.
Well drills were being run that day, so a plane in the air is not out of the question.
Also the people that may have 'witnessed' the movie go home turn on "Strangers that TELL A VISION", view it over and over and over and over until that is what they come to know or deduce from all they have been told to beLIEve by the vision tellers.
One thing I am sure of is what the people are told occurred on 11 Sept 2001 did not, what fully happened I cannot entirely say how, but it is obvious why it happened when looking at all other such tumultuous events throughout time that keep the people agitated, divided, hating, killing each other none of which results in anything that could remotely be called 'mankind'. This is not happenstance it is clearly directed, manufactured, planned...etc....etc....and there is a beneficiary to all these crimes which is why horrors like this keep occurring.
Don't know what fully happened but essentially demolition job under guise of massive exercise under further guise of terror event.
That about sums it up......
I'm in the process of reading Dr. Judy Woods' remarkable book "Where Did the Towers Go?" She approaches the towers from the point of view of dissecting a crime scene without a pre-supposition as to methods used. Instead, she examines the forensic evidence available in the form of photos, eyewitness accounts, videos. Her conclusion is that Directed Energy Weapons were used and that the buildings were essentially vaporized with a technique using energy fields based on work by Nicola Tesla and a number of other scientists. This video actually corroborates Dr. Woods work. Watch the moment when the North Tower transforms into a cloud of dust. Use the 0.25x speed and 720 setting and you can see massive steel girders hurtling through the air, only to transform into dust clouds There is a 2 hour video available on one of the channels with Dr. Woods presenting the case. Not quite so thorough as the book, but a good start. Her evidence rules out 1) NIST pancake theory 2)controlled demolition 3)thermite 4) nuclear, leaving DEW as the probable method of destruction. The book was written in 2010. Events in Lahaina in August, 2023 corroborate use of DEW.
At 31:56, the journalist says: "So we're going to war". Yes, everything went to plan.
I'd imagine they said the same during the Pearl Harbor fake. And it's convenient how 9/11 was framed as "the new Pearl Harbor" by the psychopaths in some of their literature.
Those such as us that sniff out B/S must have been well aware in 1941 that it was largely a production.
There was plenty of information known to many that the Japanese fleet was sailing to Hawaii as if 'on cue'
Oh yes, when I recognised that death and injury were staged in 9/11, I wondered about Pearl Harbour, the post-9/11 anthrax attacks and the 1980 Bologna station bombing ... and found them all to be completely staged not "false flags" per se. And then realised that while 9/11 was indeed the "new Pearl Harbour" as stated in the PNAC document, the similarity wasn't exactly as people inferred and the perps were having a little laugh over that one.
Absolutely fascinating footage. Celia Farber is a great journalist. Was critical to challenging the official AIDS story too. Very interesting article.
Yes, she is a good journalist but there are those critical of her on the AIDS story. Unfortunately, I think Celia suffers from loyalty to people and she maintained loyalty to people who were only arguing that HIV wasn't proven to cause AIDS while certain scientists, notably the Perth Group, argued that HIV itself had never been proven to exist and I think the Perth Group are right but, unfortunately, they were screwed over by certain people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Perth_Group
So much fakery with photos and videos that we have to use a different sense other than second hand vision.
I watched the second plane strike the towers the point of view from these kids would miss it considering. Of course they are trying to make sense of what happened - everybody was. - and reality made the least amount of sense because nobody initially thought it was an on purpose terrorist attack.
The previous bombing attempt on the WTC taught terrorist groups a plethora of information and they used that info to devise a plan B, and it was much more efficient on many levels.
When you say you watched the second plane strike the towers do you mean on TV or in person?
This short video compares the plane-into-tower crash shown in the 1978 film, The Medusa Touch vs the alleged Flight 175 crash and comments on how it obeys crash physics better:
Medusa Touch / Flight 175
1. Deceleration / No deceleration
2. Damage to both plane and building / No damage to plane or building, plane just melts in
3. Fuel ignites immediately at entry point / delay of fuel ignition and not at entry point
4. Debris is ejected and falls to the ground / no debris
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuhNR6lx97E
In this compilation video of 60 references made to 9/11 prior, we see a snippet of the first episode of the series, The Lone Gunmen, entitled Pilot where a plane's control is overridden to fly into a twin tower, released in March 2001 although the snippet (where video is bookmarked) stops at the point of impact. Can't get more brazen than that with your Predictive Programming, can you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AUclXzapJo&t=1215s
Suuuureee, Neely. That, or it was a scripted inside job planned decades in advance, which makes far more sense to me. Otherwise, how can you explain why America's national security apparatus simultaneously failed to stop this from happening when they had the chance?
BTW, the '93 WTC bombings were faked, too. That whole event was staged by FBI & Intel to heighten people's fears for phony Islamic terrorists - terrorists which were also created by the same people. It's a fact that Osama Bin Laden worked with the CIA, and Al Qaeda was nothing more than their front. Same with ISIS.
Yeah, the '93 bombings were part of the Predicting Programming propaganda.