Celia Farber published the post, New York, with a 15m video of candid footage from one person and probably because I clicked that footage, another video with candid footage (as far as I can tell) popped up on my YouTube feed - a 55m video comprising a number of snippets. I wasn’t aware candid footage existed and it felt really strange watching that initial footage uncontrolled by media.
I watched the second plane strike the towers the point of view from these kids would miss it considering. Of course they are trying to make sense of what happened - everybody was. - and reality made the least amount of sense because nobody initially thought it was an on purpose terrorist attack.
The previous bombing attempt on the WTC taught terrorist groups a plethora of information and they used that info to devise a plan B, and it was much more efficient on many levels.
Amazing how the camera is turned away (twice) right at the supposed moment of impact/explosion/detenation.
At 31:56, the journalist says: "So we're going to war". Yes, everything went to plan.
Absolutely fascinating footage. Celia Farber is a great journalist. Was critical to challenging the official AIDS story too. Very interesting article.
So much fakery with photos and videos that we have to use a different sense other than second hand vision.
I watched the second plane strike the towers the point of view from these kids would miss it considering. Of course they are trying to make sense of what happened - everybody was. - and reality made the least amount of sense because nobody initially thought it was an on purpose terrorist attack.
The previous bombing attempt on the WTC taught terrorist groups a plethora of information and they used that info to devise a plan B, and it was much more efficient on many levels.