David A. Hughes: Propagating the 9/11 second-level propaganda
David’s series on the 9/11 memorial museum is worth a read but there’s a glaring problem …
It seems to me, however, that this is precisely what the museum is intended to do. For example, there is something obviously traumatic about the next exhibit, namely, missing posters projected onto the wall, each one gradually fading in and out, as though to reflect lives being extinguished.
Academics have a knack for anchoring in the second-level propaganda of sophisticated psyops, they seem to have an inability to recognise that there are two very distinct types of psyop:
the simple psyop comprising a more-or-less single stream of propaganda targeting the 90% believers, eg, Sandy Hook
the sophisticated psyop comprising a more-or-less single stream for the 90% believers plus one or more streams for the disbelievers, eg, 9/11, Pearl Harbour, and the USS Liberty. The sophisticated psyop involves the presentation of a False Di-/Tri-/etc-lemma where we are given two or more false narratives to choose from. The term false flag is often used for sophisticated psyops, the term itself being a psyop in its implication that the lie is only about WHO is responsible rather than the lie also being about WHAT happened.
The distinguishing feature of the sophisticated psyop that we see in 9/11 and the other events mentioned above is that the evidence shows that the death and injury were staged.
I communicated by email a couple of times with David a few years ago on his University of Lincoln email address. He stopped engaging on the death and injury element, however, and that email address is now defunct.
, if you’re reading, there are so very many angles that show death and injury were staged on 9/11 … and if you want to tell me they weren’t, please go ahead.A priori
9/11 was a psyop.
9/11 was a psyop.
9/11 was a psyop.
Psyops are about making people believe things that aren’t true so if you do terror for real which you don’t want for real then that’s not a psyop, that’s REAL, and the propagandists don’t want REAL in psyops unless the REAL is wanted. If something isn’t wanted for REAL then it is not done for REAL. It’s a massive failure in psyoppery if you do something for real in order that people “believe” it when you don’t want it for real. You’re missing an essential part of the mind control aspect of the psyop.
9/11 was a demolition job.
The standard protocol in demolition jobs is to fully evacuate the buildings and surrounding areas prior.
The passenger airliner crashes were faked and we have no evidence that the alleged passengers were killed another way.
In whatever way the 264 alleged passenger deaths were faked so too could have been the alleged deaths of those in the buildings, including crisis actor loved ones, etc.
Lots of people were in on 9/11.
It’s hard to see how the perps would - and why they would even try to - persuade the large number of people in on 9/11, including the 118 firefighters mentioned below, to participate in a terror event where - most unnecessarily for the psyop to work - people were left behind in buildings.
Loved ones of those killed would be problematic to deal with.
We are presented with alleged loved ones such as Bob McIlvaine and the Jersey Widows “agitating”, however, as expected, these alleged loved ones have achieved precisely zero in over two decades. Real loved ones of those killed in what is obviously a government operation would behave differently.
Very important distinction between 9/11 and covid
The covid psyop has 200 years of medical fraud on which to base its propaganda and coercive strategies that - still to this day - have people being injected with substances that are injuring and killing them while there is no such basis for persuading people to leave others behind in buildings for a terror story.
In summary, a priori, it makes zero sense whatsoever for people to have been killed for real on 9/11 … which isn’t to say that there weren’t a few targeted or accidental deaths and certainly injuries - it was a massive operation.
The evidence
From numerous angles the evidence shows the death and injury were faked.
118 so-called “oral” testimonies from firefighters that:
display a great deal of nonsensicality
make zero reference to the alleged 343 deaths of the firefighters’ colleagues
despite the labelling of “oral” are presented only in transcript not recorded form which is expected
Reporter, Cynthia McFadden, outside Bellevue Hospital in the morning and outside the trauma centre in the evening states:
“These empty stretchers and wheelchairs say it all as far as the medical personnel in the city at this point.” [What is meant by “say it all”?]
“We have talked to sources who have been within the triage centre all day and asked them why the volume of extreme trauma, the number of people just hasn’t been seen. You can see this parade of ambulances behind me here … we’ve been seeing ambulances coming through all day and rescue vehicles, all of them for the most part empty with the exception of some rescue workers and some other rescuers at the scene.” [How does empty ambulances and rescue vehicles make sense for the alleged 3,000 dead and 6,000 injured?]
Quite a number of the alleged victims show clear signs of being made up - see The Vicsim Report.
Nonsense miracle survivor stories - The miracle survivors, NY Mag.
Witnesses with no credibility - Mikki Willis and Mark Walsh.
Images of alleged injured which are 100% consistent with images of people participating in a drill and in no way betray the serious injury and maiming expected of those injured in the destructions of 110-storey buildings.
References
I also recommend Jane Cena’s substack for 9/11 crisis acting and other tidbits. With regard to the crisis acting and second-level propaganda, Jane doesn’t do the “I watched this so you don’t have to” analysis - it’s up to you, depending on what level of nausea you’re prepared to experience 😁.
What's funny about false flags is that many people don't understand that such operations can both be real AND fake. There are a few such events in history (e.g., the Gulf of Tonkin, Nariyah's Testimony) that are admitted hoaxes. There's no requirement for false flags to be real events: they're only mandated to be deceptive in nature (regardless if it's lying about who's responsible or what really happened), which pairs well with hoaxes or psyops.
And regarding the 9/11 victims, it should also be mentioned that many of them don't even appear in death records such as the SSDI and a sizable portion of them have yet to be recovered and/or identified. These facts alone cast doubt on the official death toll of 9/11. I suggest you refer to these facts anytime you cover the victims in your posts:
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/sonia-morales-puopolo-flight-11-passenger/comment/128057515
As an extension on the subject of the victims, I wonder if you'll cover the DNA/forensic identification process of their remains? I suspect that's just as fudged as everything else, particularly when it concerns the alleged hijackers, none of whom were ever actually positively identified. I covered the dubious identification of one such victim myself. You can start with that:
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/timothy-ray-ward-flight-175-passenger/comment/127931541
"...the sophisticated psyop comprising a single stream for the 90% believers plus one or more streams for the disbelievers..."
I don't know about others well, but the "Wuhan lab leak" seems to fit this to a tee